- Apr 3, 2014
- 3,903
- 5,011
Well, they certainly didn't do jack **** with Kobe in those seasons either. And there is a difference between
A. Having your team built from the get go so that one player can satisfy his ego and take all the bad shots he wants and then suddenly losing that player to injury and having to go on without him, and
B. Going into the season preparing your squad for a more team-oriented type of basketball, knowing that you won't have that ego player to worry about to begin with.
But since you like to talk about the Lakers' regular season records with and without Kobe, I wonder what you have to say about them in the three-peat seasons, when Shaq and Kobe were "1A and 1B":
1999-00:
Lakers without Kobe: 12-4 (.750)
Lakers without Shaq: 1-2 (.333)
2000-01:
Lakers without Kobe: 11-3 (.786)
Lakers without Shaq: 5-3 (.625)
2001-02:
Lakers without Kobe: 2-0 (.1000)
Lakers without Shaq: 7-8 (.467)
Overall:
Lakers without Kobe: 25-7 (.781)
Lakers without Shaq: 13-13 (.500)
I bet that suddenly regular season records without Kobe would mysteriously become less significant.
These Lakers are obviously better than they were last year or the several past seasons. But thanks to Kobe's hijacking of the franchise with that terrible contract and him running Dwight out of town, they won't be what they could've been right now had Kobe retired with that achilles injury like he should've - contenders. Instead they are stuck in this limbo where they won't be good enough to contend, or bad enough to become better through the draft. Which is the worst place to be. Meanwhile, Kobe will be
while his stans attempt to do this about his legacy with the 2013-16 Lakers:
A. Having your team built from the get go so that one player can satisfy his ego and take all the bad shots he wants and then suddenly losing that player to injury and having to go on without him, and
B. Going into the season preparing your squad for a more team-oriented type of basketball, knowing that you won't have that ego player to worry about to begin with.
But since you like to talk about the Lakers' regular season records with and without Kobe, I wonder what you have to say about them in the three-peat seasons, when Shaq and Kobe were "1A and 1B":
1999-00:
Lakers without Kobe: 12-4 (.750)
Lakers without Shaq: 1-2 (.333)
2000-01:
Lakers without Kobe: 11-3 (.786)
Lakers without Shaq: 5-3 (.625)
2001-02:
Lakers without Kobe: 2-0 (.1000)
Lakers without Shaq: 7-8 (.467)
Overall:
Lakers without Kobe: 25-7 (.781)
Lakers without Shaq: 13-13 (.500)
I bet that suddenly regular season records without Kobe would mysteriously become less significant.
These Lakers are obviously better than they were last year or the several past seasons. But thanks to Kobe's hijacking of the franchise with that terrible contract and him running Dwight out of town, they won't be what they could've been right now had Kobe retired with that achilles injury like he should've - contenders. Instead they are stuck in this limbo where they won't be good enough to contend, or bad enough to become better through the draft. Which is the worst place to be. Meanwhile, Kobe will be
while his stans attempt to do this about his legacy with the 2013-16 Lakers: