- 8,762
- 13
- Joined
- May 14, 2009
Thought Larry Sanders was going the way of Marcus Haislip
OFFICIAL 2010-2011 NBA PLAYOFFS THREAD : VOL. MOST. ANTICIPATED. PLAYOFFS. EVER?
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by bigmike23,
- Start date
- 8,762
- 13
- Joined
- May 14, 2009
Thought Larry Sanders was going the way of Marcus Haislip
- 4,526
- 4,446
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2007
*insert tomorrow's article on the Lakers.Originally Posted by nicedudewithnicedreams
A clear instance of not watching games smhOriginally Posted by JsindaA
He's just mad since Pau is the best player on the lakers now.
Just to reiterate my point
You psychic???
- 4,526
- 4,446
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2007
*insert tomorrow's article on the Lakers.Originally Posted by nicedudewithnicedreams
A clear instance of not watching games smhOriginally Posted by JsindaA
He's just mad since Pau is the best player on the lakers now.
Just to reiterate my point
You psychic???
- 33,548
- 28,816
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2006
When Pau plays well, lakers are unstoppable.
When Kobe takes a million shots, they are very beatable.
When Kobe takes a million shots, they are very beatable.
- 33,548
- 28,816
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2006
When Pau plays well, lakers are unstoppable.
When Kobe takes a million shots, they are very beatable.
When Kobe takes a million shots, they are very beatable.
- 2,573
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2009
Originally Posted by GuttaGetsBusy
Originally Posted by NobleKane
There's a first time for everything
speaking of first times wasnt it the first time the celtics lost a game 7 last year? like guy above said theres a first time for everything...
Yeah I mean what happened to that streak of the Spurs winning a ring in every odd numbered year? Or the team winning game 5 of the finals when it's tied 2-2 going on to win the whole thing?
- 2,573
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2009
Originally Posted by GuttaGetsBusy
Originally Posted by NobleKane
There's a first time for everything
speaking of first times wasnt it the first time the celtics lost a game 7 last year? like guy above said theres a first time for everything...
Yeah I mean what happened to that streak of the Spurs winning a ring in every odd numbered year? Or the team winning game 5 of the finals when it's tied 2-2 going on to win the whole thing?
- 21,784
- 2,957
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2007
Pau is the most important Laker now, I have absolutely no problem admitting that. So long as he and Kobe are working well together the Lakers will remain in contention.
- 21,784
- 2,957
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2007
Pau is the most important Laker now, I have absolutely no problem admitting that. So long as he and Kobe are working well together the Lakers will remain in contention.
- 2,573
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2009
Oh yeah and Matt Barnes>Ron Artest
- 2,573
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2009
Oh yeah and Matt Barnes>Ron Artest
do be doo
Banned
- 6,589
- 547
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2009
man I love NT.
do be doo
Banned
- 6,589
- 547
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2009
man I love NT.
- 24,717
- 436
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2006
You don't have Kobe on that team, that's not a great team.
He changes the way you approach that team.
You take Kobe off the Lakers, it frees up a lot of pressure on defense.
In short spurts, sure Pau may be more important to winning, but without Kobe, that team is not contending.
He changes the way you approach that team.
You take Kobe off the Lakers, it frees up a lot of pressure on defense.
In short spurts, sure Pau may be more important to winning, but without Kobe, that team is not contending.
- 24,717
- 436
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2006
You don't have Kobe on that team, that's not a great team.
He changes the way you approach that team.
You take Kobe off the Lakers, it frees up a lot of pressure on defense.
In short spurts, sure Pau may be more important to winning, but without Kobe, that team is not contending.
He changes the way you approach that team.
You take Kobe off the Lakers, it frees up a lot of pressure on defense.
In short spurts, sure Pau may be more important to winning, but without Kobe, that team is not contending.
- 17,319
- 3,585
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2005
Of course people don't see it that way. They think Pau can lead a team solely by himself.
- 17,319
- 3,585
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2005
Of course people don't see it that way. They think Pau can lead a team solely by himself.
- 24,717
- 436
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2006
Do YOU think he can?
- 24,717
- 436
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2006
Do YOU think he can?
- 17,644
- 23,986
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2007
You could make the same post with the names reversed.
- 17,644
- 23,986
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2007
You could make the same post with the names reversed.
- 24,717
- 436
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2006
The Lakers without Pau > The Lakers without Kobe.
Either way, they ain't winning NOTHING if one of them is missing, but personally, Kobe is the bigger piece.
Either way, they ain't winning NOTHING if one of them is missing, but personally, Kobe is the bigger piece.
- 24,717
- 436
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2006
The Lakers without Pau > The Lakers without Kobe.
Either way, they ain't winning NOTHING if one of them is missing, but personally, Kobe is the bigger piece.
Either way, they ain't winning NOTHING if one of them is missing, but personally, Kobe is the bigger piece.
- 33,548
- 28,816
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2006
This year, oh no. Pau has crushed it this year, having the best year of his career.
Let me say this, Im not sure how effectively Kobe can play against really good defenses, bad defenses , mediocre defenses Kobe kills those all days, but against really good permiter defensive teams, he tends to go into jump shooting mode. Pau on the block this year? as long as they pass him the ball, he's not being stopped. He's the best C in the league.
