- Jan 11, 2006
- 4,069
- 10
--It's nice to see Laker Haters and KB Haters are having their great day in the sun...these last 2 games probably made their year. haha...
Official 2008 NBA Finals Game 2 Thread: Lakers @ Boston 6/8 6PM PST Game On ABC HD
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by kidskillz858,
- Start date
- Oct 30, 2004
- 4,751
- 10
another 80 page thread, gotta love NT
I just wanna know what the hell got into Leon Powe,
wow
I just wanna know what the hell got into Leon Powe,
wow
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 46,973
- 31,597
Originally Posted by nycknicks105
Which NOBODY has done, sooooo... ... ... yeaaaah... ... ...Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
nycknicks105:
at anyone blaming this loss to the ref's.
Did I say anyone has?? jesus Christ I'm beginning to get sick of you being so defensive lately. I know the Lakers lost, bust still. Finding anyway to get a win some how huh?
Caaaaaaalm down, buddy.
Did I say that you said that anyone blamed the loss on the refs? Nope. Don't be so defensive.
And I wish you could know exactly how long I have said that one of the most annoying things in a debate/discussion/argument is when someone views thedebate/discussion/argument as a victory or a loss for themself or others.
It's a debate, or a discussion, or an argument; there is no victory, there is no defeat.
- Jun 6, 2006
- 4,779
- 651
Originally Posted by jefffort5
Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
I love it.SO predictable, some of the rebuttals people come up with.
'You haven't reffed before, so you can't talk.'
'You've never played organized ball, so your opinion is invalid.'
According to that brilliant logic, the only people that should have a right to vote for President are people that have actually been President.
i hope that isnt a qoute..cuz i def didnt say your opinion doesnt matter
Just everyone else that isn't a mod right?
- Jul 23, 2007
- 1,503
- 10
Regardless of what anyone says, the Celtics are up 2-0 in the 2008 NBA Finals.
- Oct 15, 2001
- 8,025
- 216
Breaking news...
- Apr 8, 2005
- 11,640
- 506
Caaaaaaalm down, buddy.Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
Originally Posted by nycknicks105
Which NOBODY has done, sooooo... ... ... yeaaaah... ... ...Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
nycknicks105:at anyone blaming this loss to the ref's.
Did I say anyone has?? jesus Christ I'm beginning to get sick of you being so defensive lately. I know the Lakers lost, bust still. Finding anyway to get a win some how huh?
Did I say that you said that anyone blamed the loss on the refs? Nope. Don't be so defensive.
And I wish you could know exactly how long I have said that one of the most annoying things in a debate/discussion/argument is when someone views the debate/discussion/argument as a victory or a loss for themself or others.
It's a debate, or a discussion, or an argument; there is no victory, there is no defeat.
If you read your post, you clearly posted an innuendo. Implementing I stated people blamed this loss on the ref's.
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 46,973
- 31,597
jefffort5:
Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
I love it.SO predictable, some of the rebuttals people come up with.
'You haven't reffed before, so you can't talk.'
'You've never played organized ball, so your opinion is invalid.'
According to that brilliant logic, the only people that should have a right to vote for President are people that have actually been President.
i hope that isnt a qoute..cuz i def didnt say your opinion doesnt matter
O.K.
So why did you ask if people have reffed or played organized ball? Clearly you had a purpose, so what is it?
- Feb 27, 2004
- 4,096
- 12
Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
I love it.SO predictable, some of the rebuttals people come up with.
'You haven't reffed before, so you can't talk.'
'You've never played organized ball, so your opinion is invalid.'
According to that brilliant logic, the only people that should have a right to vote for President are people that have actually been President.
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 46,973
- 31,597
Originally Posted by nycknicks105
Caaaaaaalm down, buddy.Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
Originally Posted by nycknicks105
Which NOBODY has done, sooooo... ... ... yeaaaah... ... ...Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
nycknicks105:at anyone blaming this loss to the ref's.
Did I say anyone has?? jesus Christ I'm beginning to get sick of you being so defensive lately. I know the Lakers lost, bust still. Finding anyway to get a win some how huh?Breathe in; breathe out.
Did I say that you said that anyone blamed the loss on the refs? Nope. Don't be so defensive.
And I wish you could know exactly how long I have said that one of the most annoying things in a debate/discussion/argument is when someone views the debate/discussion/argument as a victory or a loss for themself or others.
It's a debate, or a discussion, or an argument; there is no victory, there is no defeat.
If you read your post, you clearly posted an innuendo. Implementing I stated people blamed this loss on the ref's.
And I could say the same of your post, so what's the problem?
"If you read your post, you clearly posted an innuendo, inferring that people blamed the loss on the refs."
- Nov 27, 2005
- 2,223
- 11
O.K.Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
jefffort5:
Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
I love it.SO predictable, some of the rebuttals people come up with.
'You haven't reffed before, so you can't talk.'
'You've never played organized ball, so your opinion is invalid.'
According to that brilliant logic, the only people that should have a right to vote for President are people that have actually been President.
i hope that isnt a qoute..cuz i def didnt say your opinion doesnt matter
So why did you ask if people have reffed or played organized ball? Clearly you had a purpose, so what is it?
go to the last page...and see my response to misterP
- Apr 8, 2005
- 11,640
- 506
And I could say the same of your post, so what's the problem?Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
Originally Posted by nycknicks105
Caaaaaaalm down, buddy.Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
Originally Posted by nycknicks105
Which NOBODY has done, sooooo... ... ... yeaaaah... ... ...Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
nycknicks105:at anyone blaming this loss to the ref's.
Did I say anyone has?? jesus Christ I'm beginning to get sick of you being so defensive lately. I know the Lakers lost, bust still. Finding anyway to get a win some how huh?Breathe in; breathe out.
Did I say that you said that anyone blamed the loss on the refs? Nope. Don't be so defensive.
And I wish you could know exactly how long I have said that one of the most annoying things in a debate/discussion/argument is when someone views the debate/discussion/argument as a victory or a loss for themself or others.
It's a debate, or a discussion, or an argument; there is no victory, there is no defeat.
If you read your post, you clearly posted an innuendo. Implementing I stated people blamed this loss on the ref's.
"If you read your post, you clearly posted an innuendo, inferring that people blamed the loss on the refs."
No, you cant. I stated that you implied I said other's blamed the loss on the ref's. When you clearly came into the rescue for Laker's nationto point out no one has blamed the ref's.
All I said was, "
You just interpreted my post wrong.
- Oct 15, 2001
- 8,025
- 216
Your response to me was obvious to any casual fan of basketball. I still don't see the purpose.
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 46,973
- 31,597
^ Already read it before.
You said "ok..but playing organized ball...you know you officals win/lose a game for you "
Soooo... like I said you're saying 'You've never played organized ball, so your opinion is invalid.'
You said "ok..but playing organized ball...you know you officals win/lose a game for you "
Soooo... like I said you're saying 'You've never played organized ball, so your opinion is invalid.'
- Nov 10, 2007
- 2,612
- 10
But those aren't mutually exclusive. If you played, you'd know that they can win/lose games for you. But that doesn't necessarily mean youropinion is invalid if you don't.
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 46,973
- 31,597
- Nov 27, 2005
- 2,223
- 11
thats def not a translation for that...
- Nov 27, 2005
- 2,223
- 11
dbl post
- Oct 15, 2001
- 8,025
- 216
I'm done.
See you all Tuesday.
- Aug 23, 2007
- 14,257
- 5,503
I don't see how trolls thinking they can unleash their hidden secret hate for the LAKERS when they are down and when the LAKERS win they are no where to beseen. lol
- Apr 9, 2004
- 3,995
- 44
You can talk about referring all you want but at the end of the day it comes down to rebounding, defense and execution. The Lakers lost all three of thosecategories easily with or without help from the officiating crew. LA just looks out of sink and their offensive fluidity is completely absent unlike theirother playoff series. And that's what this game boiled down to.
- May 30, 2008
- 1,004
- 10
oh the irony
i love it
- Nov 27, 2005
- 2,223
- 11
hmmm...ok..well let me break it down further...its been 10 plus pages complaining about refs...but last i checked...refs cant dribble, they dont stickdefense, they dont coach, they dont shoot, i mean must i say more?
- Dec 7, 2004
- 468
- 12
was anyone at staples?? It was crazy up in their! A fight broke out with like 5 min left, it started out as some guys gettin into it cuz one of em had aceltics jersey on and then it suddenly turned into a hispanic vs. black thing and it got outta control. !%@@ was bananas!!
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 46,973
- 31,597
O.K., so even if a person hasn't played organized ball, they can still have a very valid opinion on officiating. Someone who has playedorganized ball does NOT have a more valid opinion than someone who hasn't.Originally Posted by jefffort5
thats def not a translation for that...
Would you agree with that statement?
