- 8,131
- 618
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2007
What does smoking have to do with morals? I wish you guys would come with a better argument as to why Barack shouldn't be President. And would you get overAyers already?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
What does smoking weed have to do with morality? I know plenty of people that use drugs on a regular basis that have great morals (at least in myview) and people who have never taken drugs that have no morals. Sorry, I just don't see the connection.Originally Posted by bns1201
damn i didnt realize that so many NT'ers had stiff necks....yall dudes are straight up lookin to the left. Am i literally the only one that thinks this whole board is devoid of morality and the ability to see that this guy just aint the real deal. And before november 4th comes, i still have to make my decision on who I'm voting for, but you can bet on it that Im not puttin either of the 2 main (obama/mccain) on my ballot.....i feel like this whole board is jumpin on the hypetrain that is, and riding it along with everyone else in this country. But ya'll are just failing to see that morality has clearly been thrown out the window here.
Originally Posted by OGbobbyjohnson773
Palin wouldnt qualify to be a school janitor.
I knew this would happenOriginally Posted by bns1201
Originally Posted by smoke ya later
remember George and Martha Washington smoked marijuana/?
yea, do you remember? gtfooh John Titor. From what i know dude only grew it, but other than that i cant say i REMEMBER him smoking marijuana.
Originally Posted by Rexanglorum
To the OP, I am not looking to insult, or belittle you. I am not trying to be like a few of the people in this thread who are just looking to pile on you and your ideas. I can respect your ideas even if I disagree with them.
I am wondering though how you address the undeniable reality that many laws have flown in the face of justice and the most basic principles of human freedom and human dignity. We can all agree that laws that have legitimized slavery, for example, were wrong. How can you be so certain that in this particular time and place that an activity's being illegal makes it immoral? Why do you have so much confidence in legislators today, when past congresses and parliaments have created laws that we can all agree were, beyond any doubt, unjust?
Originally Posted by lawdog1
Originally Posted by Rexanglorum
To the OP, I am not looking to insult, or belittle you. I am not trying to be like a few of the people in this thread who are just looking to pile on you and your ideas. I can respect your ideas even if I disagree with them.
I am wondering though how you address the undeniable reality that many laws have flown in the face of justice and the most basic principles of human freedom and human dignity. We can all agree that laws that have legitimized slavery, for example, were wrong. How can you be so certain that in this particular time and place that an activity's being illegal makes it immoral? Why do you have so much confidence in legislators today, when past congresses and parliaments have created laws that we can all agree were, beyond any doubt, unjust?
I can't help but notice that the OP has not responded to any of your three very insightful posts in this thread. I think that says something.
pot smoker? terrorist?Originally Posted by bns1201
He can be a pot smokin, terrorist (former or not, he's still a terrorist) lovin person, and LEAD THIS DAMN
NATION!?!?!?
Originally Posted by USABasketball08
OP FAIL
Originally Posted by BwooDFolkGD74
Originally Posted by lawdog1
Rexanglorum wrote:
To the OP, I am not looking to insult, or belittle you. I am not trying to be like a few of the people in this thread who are just looking to pile on you
and your ideas. I can respect your ideas even if I disagree with them.
I am wondering though how you address the undeniable reality that many laws have flown in the face of justice and the most basic principles of human freedom
and human dignity. We can all agree that laws that have legitimized slavery, for example, were wrong. How can you be so certain that in this particular time
and place that an activity's being illegal makes it immoral? Why do you have so much confidence in legislators today, when past congresses and
parliaments have created laws that we can all agree were, beyond any doubt, unjust?
I can't help but notice that the OP has not responded to any of your three very insightful posts in this thread. I think that says something.
Originally Posted by bns1201
Originally Posted by JBug88
and Bush was a coke head....
-J-
and did I say anything about bush....dude shouldnt be president either. Personally I cannot stand either candidate, or their VP's...but to allow this dude in to the highest office is ridiculous....i mean is there even a backround check for the damn presidency?
I really can't think of a situation where breaking a law is not immoral.
And thats why your argument(s) can't be taken seriously.
op should be ip bannedOriginally Posted by lurkin2long
Originally Posted by bns1201
Originally Posted by BwooDFolkGD74
Originally Posted by lawdog1
Rexanglorum wrote:
To the OP, I am not looking to insult, or belittle you. I am not trying to be like a few of the people in this thread who are just looking to pile on you
and your ideas. I can respect your ideas even if I disagree with them.
I am wondering though how you address the undeniable reality that many laws have flown in the face of justice and the most basic principles of human freedom
and human dignity. We can all agree that laws that have legitimized slavery, for example, were wrong. How can you be so certain that in this particular time
and place that an activity's being illegal makes it immoral? Why do you have so much confidence in legislators today, when past congresses and
parliaments have created laws that we can all agree were, beyond any doubt, unjust?
I can't help but notice that the OP has not responded to any of your three very insightful posts in this thread. I think that says something.
Exactly what I was thinking while reading this thread.
Originally Posted by FIRST B0RN
op should be ip bannedOriginally Posted by lurkin2long
And thats why your argument(s) can't be taken seriously.Originally Posted by BwooDFolkGD74
I really can't think of a situation where breaking a law is not immoral.