- 2,549
- 206
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2010
There are still some good cops out there, unfortunately it's a rare breed
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
View media item 152347
infowars
say word? he didnt know he was being filmed? she's like 6-7 feet away. Homie must still have that Officer Hoyt steeze where everything is cupcakes and gumdrops.
What type of awareness is that tho? what if she was aiming the cannon?
what he did was commendable, but the event is kinda suspect.
there is no such thing as a selfless act read up on Nietzsche.
Definitely an action worthy of praise, but the publicity it's getting shows just how screwed up our police force is. For every 1 cop like this, there's 100 more who would dismiss, degrade, and or eventually arrest a homeless person just for being homeless. Seen it more times than I can remember.
Still, props to the officer.
Great responses in here. Cop won't last long on the beat tho. Son has a heart and will get smoked shortly. Are you a sheep or a wolf
So I suppose I should ask the question, why did the officer give the homeless man a pair of shoes? The answer is simple. The homeless man was without a pair of shoes. So the officer improves the homeless man's quality of life. That's fact. At this point, I'm definitely saying the Police Officer does this act and he receives self-gratification for doing it....not that his SOLE motive for acting was to feel better about himself. I think it's fairly clear in this example as the Police Officer is quoted in the article, saying he could "only imagine how cold the pavement was", empathizing with the homeless man's plight. The Police Officer put himself in the homeless man's shoes and is compelled to help. The real argument lies in whether personal gratification is truly a "gift" in return when compared to fame, money, and position.
Once again, there's nothing wrong with receiving gratification for helping. Nothing at all. I'd assume in most charitable cases, the doer sees a situation and subconsciously says to themselves, "I can't let this be. I must act."
The philosophy that there is no such thing as a completely selfless act(unless it was accidental) is a pretty agreeable one in my opinion. I don't see why there are so many people disagreeing with it.
That being said, I don't think it has a place in this thread when it's being used to degrade what the cop did. Whether true altruism exists or not is an academic debate. Assuming true altruism doesn't exist, we can degrade just about anything and everything. We have to be relative when we judge this NYPD officer. He did a good thing and it would be presumptuous to think otherwise.
You forgot we were on Niketalk for a second? Even when cops do something good its still **** the police.
I see it every day.I'd say it's the opposite. For every 1 cop who would harass someone, there are 100 that won't.
This statement gets 3 reps?he's still wet behind the ears
By next year he'll be shooting homeless men