- 276
- 113
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2012
That cops gonna get so much P out of this.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
no, that first part suggests that the doer doesn't expect to receive something in return
I'm enjoying this discussion so I don't want it to seem like I'm going "at you", but I'd disagree with that. The definition was more about if the doer cared about what if something happened to them, not necessarily if they expected it...hence the word "concern", which is closely related to one's feelings or level of worriness. No action, good or bad, is without consequence.
LMFAOThat cops gonna get so much P out of this.
no worries, this is just a discussion.
the definition provided goes on to mention several materialistic rewards such as fame, position, money, etc. for the example of the police officer, those would apply. in that case, if the officer were giving as a selfless act, they do not expect to receive something in return. if they were to receive something after the fact, that still wouldn't negate the selfless act. i agree that no action is without consequence, but i'm not sure how that's relevant.
the examples you presented for why each person committed a selfless act were assumptions. i.e. the officer did it to feel better about himself.
no worries, this is just a discussion.
the definition provided goes on to mention several materialistic rewards such as fame, position, money, etc. for the example of the police officer, those would apply. in that case, if the officer were giving as a selfless act, they do not expect to receive something in return. if they were to receive something after the fact, that still wouldn't negate the selfless act. i agree that no action is without consequence, but i'm not sure how that's relevant.
the examples you presented for why each person committed a selfless act were assumptions. i.e. the officer did it to feel better about himself.
there is no such thing as a selfless act read up on Nietzsche.
there is no such thing as a selfless act read up on Nietzsche.
You forgot we were on Niketalk for a second? Even when cops do something good its still **** the police.Figures
dudes still find a way to bash
Especially if he's patrolling at one of the 6 Train stops.That cops gonna get so much P out of this.
Philosophy is based upon logic, regardless of who said what if you want to think it through and test it in your head yourself maybe try that route instead of disregarding it because it conflicts with your opinion.
Especially if he's patrolling at one of the 6 Train stops.That cops gonna get so much P out of this.
there is no such thing as a selfless act read up on Nietzsche.
Philosophy is based upon logic, regardless of who said what if you want to think it through and test it in your head yourself maybe try that route instead of disregarding it because it conflicts with your opinion.
Na I figured there was only one philosopher who's word ruled above everyone elses.
The officer did it because he empathized, how can he feel good about feeling bad that the man is out in the cold iwth no shoes... By doing this deed he'd feel good about himself. happy that he made another person happy.
no worries, this is just a discussion.
the definition provided goes on to mention several materialistic rewards such as fame, position, money, etc. for the example of the police officer, those would apply. in that case, if the officer were giving as a selfless act, they do not expect to receive something in return. if they were to receive something after the fact, that still wouldn't negate the selfless act. i agree that no action is without consequence, but i'm not sure how that's relevant.
the examples you presented for why each person committed a selfless act were assumptions. i.e. the officer did it to feel better about himself.
This.Good for him and good for the NYPD they sure need the positive publicity.
That's a kind young man.