- Jun 12, 2006
- 2,735
- 10
dammit bama. smh at me for rinding on what they did the game before. shouldve bet against the public.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by 651akathePaul
Since I'm on fire right now, I'll go ahead and reiterate that you heard it here first.Originally Posted by 651akathePaul
Originally Posted by fraij da 5 11
89% of the public is on Oregon right now.
You guys need to stay away from that game. Despite what you see on the ticker, Washington State has been playing much better of late and their QB is getting into somewhat of a rhythm.
Tack on Oregon coming off of that high versus Stanford, you might be surprised when WSU covers. Oregon will win, but I'd stay away.
I'm just sayin...
Great day. Good luck on everything except AuburnOriginally Posted by 651akathePaul
6-0 so far today boys. My picks have been on point and going much the way I anticipated. At this point, I'm just hoping to let the good times roll.Originally Posted by 651akathePaul
This afternoon:
Michigan St. (+4.5) vs. Michigan
Arkansas (-5) vs. Texas A&M
Clemson vs. UNC (-2.5)
Michigan St (+4.5) vs. Michigan:
I don't see any reason to roll with Michigan today other than Denard Robinson, but that's not enough for me. Their defense is horrendous and Michigan State is solid on both sides of the ball. They can get the few key stops that Indiana could not last week, but the selling point is that Michigan St. can control the clock on the ground and if it comes down to it, can throw the ball to keep the pace with Denard. MSU straight up.
Arkansas (-6) vs. Texas A&M:
Interesting stat I've heard. BCS teams coming off of a bye week only cover 50% of their games the following week. Texas A&M can be tough, but I would go against Arkansas only if it were actually being played at Texas A&M's place. This game is on a nuetral field and A&M's secondary is a bit suspect. Mallett will take advantage of both and get Arkansas back on track
This evening:
Oregon State (+8.5) vs. Arizona
Florida State (+6) vs. Miami
Northwestern (-8.5) vs. Purdue
Arizona State vs. Washington (Pick 'em)
USC vs. Stanford (-10)
Auburn (-6) vs. Kentucky
Originally Posted by 4wrestling
Originally Posted by Mojodmonky1
damn.... i sat this thread out for a week and it sure took an ugly turn.
not sure if any of yall bet MMA, but for those who have taken an interest in my analysis and picks in the past, here is my unsolicited pick/analysis for this weeks event
BET NICK DIAZ
In my opinion, Diaz v. Noons 1 is not relevant. While Diaz has decent to good cardio, that weight cut to 160 was just a bit too much for him. Fighting as a legit WW, I dont think the cut is going to have as much an effect (if any) this time around. As much as I hate Diaz, I respect his fighting abilities. Even though he may act like a knucklehead in interviews, press conferences, etc... etc.. I honestly believe that he is not a "dumb" fighter. Both Diaz brothers have a knack for getting their opponent to fight their fight, not the other way around. I will admit that I have not seen a ton of KJ Noons before, but what I have seen has not been that impressive.
Looking at KJ's last fights, he was able to out-strike Huen and Gurgel. But neither fighter made a concerted effort to take this fight to the mat. No one is doubting Noons abilities as a boxer/striker. While Nick's unorthodox striking style can be difficult to counter, I would still give the edge to Noons on the feet. The problem is, any advantage that Noons has standing, he more than gives up on the ground. While Diaz doesnt have overwhelming takedowns, Noons (as far as I can tell) does not have a great sprawl or takedown defense of his own. Eventually, Diaz will be able to take this fight to the mat with his guile and size/strength advantage. On the ground, Noons is in dangerous territory. If Diaz can get into top control, it could make for a short night. My only concern is that Diaz tries to get too cute, and passes up the freebie submission just so he can batter Noons a bit. Hopefully his arrogance does not give Noons an extra opportunity to get back to his feet and pull off some sort of KO.
I booked Diaz at -210. Line appears to be in the -230 to -240 range. Personally I think there is still value up to -250. Anything above that I might stay away.
SWAGTISTA IS IN DIAZ'S CORNER. HE'S NOT LOSING.
Originally Posted by fraij da 5 11
I put a little on it when it was at -250... Probably see what the line is near fight time to see if i wanna put in more.
10/10/2010 01:00 PM | 425 - Green Bay Packers 426 - Washington ******** | 52261 | | -1 -112 +1 104 | -2.5 -106 +2.5 -102 |
10/10/2010 04:05 PM | 429 - New Orleans Saints 430 - Arizona Cardinals | 40393 | | -6.5 -104 +6.5 -104 | -6.5 -107 +6.5 -101 |
10/10/2010 04:15 PM | 431 - San Diego Chargers 432 - Oakland Raiders | 38751 | | -5.5 -104 +5.5 -104 | -6 -110 +6 102 |
10/10/2010 01:00 PM | 419 - Atlanta Falcons 420 - Cleveland Browns | 42219 | | -3 -110 +3 102 | -3 -102 +3 -106 |
10/10/2010 01:00 PM | 427 - New York Giants 428 - Houston Texans | 41612 | | +3.5 -120 -3.5 111 | +3 104 -3 -113 |
Originally Posted by fraij da 5 11
K couple lines vs public observations...
Line started at GBP -1 and has moved to GBP -2.5 with 83% of people still on GB.
10/10/2010
01:00 PM
425 - Green Bay Packers
426 - Washington ********
52261 -1 -112
+1 104-2.5 -106
+2.5 -102
Different story here, 82% of the Pub is on NO in this game but the line has not moved an inch.
10/10/2010
04:05 PM
429 - New Orleans Saints
430 - Arizona Cardinals
40393 -6.5 -104
+6.5 -104-6.5 -107
+6.5 -101
Half point movement here from SD -5.5 to SD -6.
10/10/2010
04:15 PM
431 - San Diego Chargers
432 - Oakland Raiders
38751 -5.5 -104
+5.5 -104-6 -110
+6 102
No movement in this line with 80% going with ATL on the road.
10/10/2010
01:00 PM
419 - Atlanta Falcons
420 - Cleveland Browns
42219 -3 -110
+3 102-3 -102
+3 -106
Yup you have to take into account the $$$ amounts as well. Usually if you see a team has a high % of the bets on it but the line isn't moving at all (or is moving the other way) that means the "smart money" (large individual wagers) are being made on the other team.Originally Posted by 4wrestling
Originally Posted by fraij da 5 11
K couple lines vs public observations...
Line started at GBP -1 and has moved to GBP -2.5 with 83% of people still on GB.
10/10/2010
01:00 PM
425 - Green Bay Packers
426 - Washington ********
52261 -1 -112
+1 104-2.5 -106
+2.5 -102
Different story here, 82% of the Pub is on NO in this game but the line has not moved an inch.
10/10/2010
04:05 PM
429 - New Orleans Saints
430 - Arizona Cardinals
40393 -6.5 -104
+6.5 -104-6.5 -107
+6.5 -101
Half point movement here from SD -5.5 to SD -6.
10/10/2010
04:15 PM
431 - San Diego Chargers
432 - Oakland Raiders
38751 -5.5 -104
+5.5 -104-6 -110
+6 102
No movement in this line with 80% going with ATL on the road.
10/10/2010
01:00 PM
419 - Atlanta Falcons
420 - Cleveland Browns
42219 -3 -110
+3 102-3 -102
+3 -106
I love looking at these numbers and take them into account. However, one thing I've learned from other forums... These %'s show the # of bets. They don't NOT tell you the volume of $$$. So just because a team has a large % of bets, the minority may be pounding them with lots of $$$ which can account for some of the strange line moves. Just another thing to take into account