- Jun 1, 2015
- 242
- 637
Exactly my same thoughts/position!I go for OG's only so it's easier on the budget. If they dial back the OG's in 2017 it'll be even more money saved.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exactly my same thoughts/position!I go for OG's only so it's easier on the budget. If they dial back the OG's in 2017 it'll be even more money saved.
I would like to see a tongue comparison with the other 5s that released between 2015 - 2016Close enough for me. The reason they changed it is because the OG reflective material started to chip and peel after time and there was no way to fix it. the OGs and 2000s had this problem
It looks pre-yellowed...I'm glad y'all ain't complaining about the air bubble unit color like in the cement 4s thread
You the only other cat in this thread with any type of sense.Sorry but 2016's > OG
New age collector
Sorry but 2016's > OG
New age collector
i would say it is a bad trade for you unless you just don't want them. I see these sitting like the Maroon 6s for a little. It is an OG colorway getting an OG treatment, but at the end of the day it is a all black shoe and $220. The Cement 4 is much more iconic IMO than these.You guys think I can get a trade straight up for these with one of my cement iv,s?
I am not comparing shoe to shoe, I am just saying that this is a release where it is an outstanding shoe, but it isn't an outstanding colorway to the average consumer.^cant compare these to maroon 6s. This is thee best 5 by far for a lot of people. And especially after those horrible joints in 2011. The 220 will make me a little easier to get but they'll b gone quickly...
Real talk2016 > OGs