- Apr 23, 2015
- 8,799
- 10,386
The blue doesn't make any logical sense. I'll never understand it.
What makes it even worse is that the Maroon 6 exists.
What makes it even worse is that the Maroon 6 exists.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The blue doesn't make any logical sense. I'll never understand it.
What makes it even worse is that the Maroon 6 exists.
The 3m tongue is plenty.the 5s had the icey sole on the last release. I think it gives the metallic 5's more of the 'wow' effect from afar
easier than the Glue games tooYeah the WC4's were easy AFYeah, you know how some folks are though. If they didn't cook, then the release was hard. On the contrary, I know multiple people that cooked twice on WC4s.
I'm high key disappointed in the 3M >:
The blue doesn't make any logical sense. I'll never understand it.
What makes it even worse is that the Maroon 6 exists.
This, I was always turned off by the #23. The removal of #23+NA branding=must cop!!The most glaring change to the 2016's, aside from the NA heel branding, is the removal of the "23." I was never much of a fan of that. I know that's the old school Jordan PE style but it was somewhat distracting and out of place if you know what I mean. Super glad they removed it!
HOW DO NEWER V'S FIT?… I HAVE 07S WHICH WERE TTS (COMFORTABLE WITH MINOR TOE WIGGLE ROOM)
Yes it does make sense. They went with the original look on that pair and decided against the OG look on this pair. This is the first OG remastered release featuring a clear sole since the Maroons. They took a step back with these. That's my point.??? The Maroon 6s aren't a translucent sole;they're milky, so it makes no sense to compare. They're like the 72-10 11s.
exactly, but you would be surprised what some people consider a hard release lol.
The blue doesn't make any logical sense. I'll never understand it.
What makes it even worse is that the Maroon 6 exists.
That damn tongue . Why did they have to mess the best part of this shoe up?? Nike give us at least the 3M from 2006!
The reflective on the 2016s looks brighter than the 2007s to me.
Why would they? That's definitely not OG. The blue tint isn't OG either, but it's just to slow down yellow; ultimately it's the same overall design. Making it milky would be a different design for this shoe.Yeah, Im surprised they didnt use the same milky sole on these that they did with the Maroon VI. They wouldve looked awesome. Nonetheless, Its not a deal breaker for me, so Im still buying two pairs.
The most glaring change to the 2016's, aside from the NA heel branding, is the removal of the "23." I was never much of a fan of that. I know that's the old school Jordan PE style but it was somewhat distracting and out of place if you know what I mean. Super glad they removed it!
Show looks great. Why are we complaining about a blue sole that's going to age? And turn into the desired color...
Why would they? That's definitely not OG. The blue tint isn't OG either, but it's just to slow down yellow; ultimately it's the same overall design. Making it milky would be a different design for this shoe.