- Jul 22, 2001
- 8,392
- 268
Nnamdi will be better than he was in Philly.
Not a huge prediction right there to be honest. I was better sitting on my couch than Nnamdi was in Philly.
Im not entirely sure whether his Oakland success wasnt more that the guy on the opposite side of him just sucked so bad that is was easier to pick on them the whole game rather than going after Nnamdi's man. Seeing what went down last season.
But we will see I guess.
Would it surprise anyone to see Nnamdi perform just as poorly? I wouldn't take for granted that he will be better, but I think he's going to rededicate himself and develop an urgency that will keep him in the league as a starter.
It wouldnt really surprise me either way. I could see him sucking in SF just as easily as I could see him come back to form now that he is on a proven winner that doesnt have locker room trouble every other day like Philly did.
With the whole not eating lunch with the team stories its hard to tell if the team was the problem or if he was the problem. But since there were no stories about that in Oakland I would prolly lean towards the former.