- Nov 17, 2004
- 37,287
- 19,666
QBs get all the credit for wins.
QBs get all the blame for losses.
That's just the way it is.
QBs get all the blame for losses.
That's just the way it is.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
are you remembering the game correctly ? Brady led them down for a score to put them up 14-10 with 2:42 seconds left , then the defense let up a TD to Plaxico , only giving Brady and the offense 0:35 to get them in field goal range . id hardly say thats Brady losing them the super bowl ...
are you remembering the game correctly ? Brady led them down for a score to put them up 14-10 with 2:42 seconds left , then the defense let up a TD to Plaxico , only giving Brady and the offense 0:35 to get them in field goal range . id hardly say thats Brady losing them the super bowl ...
I hope RG3 goes the Marshawn Lynch route and doesn't talk to the media at all in 2014.
BTW, London Fletcher has been on Twitter calling out Jim Haslett and did so in some press conferences as well this year. He's just calling it how he sees it IMO. But, then again, it's not like he was in the locker room or has spent any time in there to back up his claims...and it's not like his locker was right next to RG3's either.
10k capes will come soaring to defend their players' honorYou really cannot say a bad word about any Seahawk
if im not mistaken , Peyton has 7 "one and done"s in the playoffs as the 1 or 2 seed , meaning he was at home and coming off the bye week . since no one is arguing that Rodgers is the best of all time and his playoff record is better , he doesnt get held to the same standard
Peyton did "enough" to win that game last year.
We're going in circles here. As I said before, of course Sally Jenkins has been wrong in her reporting before........who hasn't. You believe Sally Jenkins to be bias, just like I believe London Fletcher to be bias, just like you believe me to be bias on the RGIII matter, just like I believe you to be bias on the RGIII matter. I think I covered all bases thereSally Jenkins has had a few instances of shoddy reporting in the past (Lance Armstrong/Joe Paterno), but we'll give her the benefit of the doubt when she's adding gasoline to the fire when discussing the Skins. Sally Jenkins had NO sources to her article, but yet what she's saying is more credible than what London Fletcher was speaking on? How does that make any sense?
*edit*
For the 10000th time, no one said RG3 is w/o criticism. However, there are two types of criticism surrounding him. Valid - meaning FACTUAL, and Baseless - meaning, without fact.
I agree.Cause it can def go both ways. Sally can be lying, but London could just be giving the PC answer.
Babies need milk to survive champ.I hope RG3 goes the Marshawn Lynch route and doesn't talk to the media at all in 2014
it's the internet, and especially here I wouldn't take anything personally. Don't know why you thought I took it that way.You coulda did without the bolded. Seems like ur taking it personal.
But everyone can agree London is a stand up guy. I've never met nobody who doesn't like him or respect him.
But why is his word gospel? For all we know he was being PC, Tryna keep the peace.
Y'all picking and choosing who to believe.
Nd usually the negative stories are slander or lies. And the good ones are facts and his locker is next to him so no way he can lie.
I take it ALL with a grain. Cause nobody really knows except those directly involved.
It's not outside the realm of possibilities that all this is true tho. Nd y'all disregarding it like it is.
If London would've backed up Jenkins' story I'd believe him as well.
I hope so, maybe he can start living up to that legacy.
If Micah Hyde just squeezes that rock....If Dallas Clark doesn't drop a 4th down pass, they beat the Chargers...
If Pierre Garcon doesn't have two bad drops, and the defense doesn't allow Mark Sanchez to move down the field with less than a minute remaining, they beat the Jets...
There's plenty of 'ifs' for every QB in the league, especially during the playoffs. End of the day, it falls on them.
dont know what the beef with ric flair is for the people of carolina, as well as the panther players.... Ric flair is in his 60's the panthers have been in existence less than 20 years....
when he was growing up in the 60's, 70's, 80's he probably was a true niners fan.... when panthers debut, im sure he like the team based on location, and location alone.... so whats the problem?
If Patrick Clayton caught that deep post. Smh