- 4,271
- 267
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2005
glad we got nash, one of my all time favorites
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by aztec06jr
Originally Posted by Diaz
Aww c'mon man... now I gotta see my man Nash get swepped hahaha
Originally Posted by nyk buc
Dave McMenamin @mcten37s
Pau or Bynum trade the next shoe to drop after Nash? Not so fast. Source tells me Lakers intend to keep core intact to play with Nash
Retweeted by sam_amick
Lakers will be better, but still won't beat OKC.
Originally Posted by KMante
I can't lie, my relationship with the Lakers has been scarred since the Shaq departure,
Originally Posted by MJGREATXII
I'm cringing at a possible back court of steve blake and steve nash during games.
Expect teams to go on 10-0 runs till Potato head maybe calls a time out.
Originally Posted by blahzee
Originally Posted by KMante
I can't lie, my relationship with the Lakers has been scarred since the Shaq departure,
Putting The Steve Nash Trade Under The Microscope
Steve Nash will be a Laker.
It’s still sinking in so I just keep repeating it to myself. It rolls nicely off the tongue, I must admit.
The Lakers have added one of the marquee players at his position but with the deal there are variables to explore, questions that need to be asked and answered. And, so, lets get to it…
What Did It Cost?
The Lakers used their trade exception from the Lamar Odom trade to acquire Nash. Reports put his salary “in excess of $25 million
Originally Posted by goldenarmz97
The Lakers aren't better with Steve Nash? oh.Originally Posted by SHUGES
Originally Posted by DTruth07
Nash? Grant Hill? R. Lewis? Jamison? What are we doing! Need to get younger not older
Agreed. Nash is nice but I would have went in another direction if I were LA.Originally Posted by cleansneaksonly21
We got rid of fisher because he couldnt guard a chair and now we got Nash who cant guard his own shadow... dont get it.
We are not younger, more athletic, or better...
Teams will kill us with the P&R even more SMH
Yep.
Originally Posted by SHUGES
Great points MR J. The Lakers definitely need to get younger, no question. I just think it would make the most sense to eventually find a big to turn the franchise over to. Cuz if you bring in any scoring wing or guard, I could see Kobe having a very hard time passing the torch - and the ball - to him.