**LOCK NEEDED** 2018-19 NFL thread/ macbk has his back stabbed. Everyone go to nickmaz' thread!

Once and for all - who should create the new 2018-19 Season Thread?

  • macbk

    Votes: 14 38.9%
  • aNYone

    Votes: 10 27.8%
  • Nike Jordan

    Votes: 1 2.8%
  • No new thread, keep this current one as is

    Votes: 4 11.1%
  • nickmaz

    Votes: 7 19.4%

  • Total voters
    36
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Mia Khalifa? Why do all these athletes chase that :smh:

i'll never understand.. i would be going after abella danger, eva lovia, carter cruise, asa or kennedy leigh.. but that's just me

i mean there are couple others, but those would be the ones i'd shoot my shot with first

i mean her work would already kill the interest.. but her putting dudes on blast wouldnt definitely kill any chance of that.. not saying i wouldnt hit, but i aint trying hit up DMs
 
Last edited:
I have never "slid" in someone's dms in my life

Ok....actually once

But I wouldn't be doing that on twitter to a "famous" person
 
Chris said more than that. Nick saying that Dak would be great anywhere is crazy. He was able to manage games last year and grow as the season went on. He wouldn't have been able to do that if he was a top pick in that draft.

I definitely agree and that goes without saying. Nick is delusional if he actually believes that.



i'll never understand.. i would be going after abella danger, eva lovia, carter cruise or asa.. but that's just me

i mean there are couple others, but those would be the ones i'd shoot my shot with first

i mean her work would already kill the interest.. but her putting dudes on blast wouldnt definitely kill any chance of that.. not saying i wouldnt hit, but i aint trying hit up DMs

She's so whack. :smh:
 
CC spitting that fire


yea this dude nick talking crazy.. i usually like him, but that could be a "hot friend" thing.. where he's surrounded by so much crap, that he comes out looking pretty because of it

i mean really all fox got now, is shannon and dude.. now that my girl katie (nolan) has taken her talents to the big leagues
 
She's a dead fish and a loud mouth. Easy pass.

yup.. easy

now if i saw her out some place and had a couple, that could change QUICK.. but i would stay on my toes (or at least try to) and make sure she wasnt trying take pics or throw some dumb shhh up online
 
if we talking pros who went MIA, charley chase and jenaveve must have gone in witness protection

we know where sunny at, which is amazing.. thought they were ULTRA conservative over that side
 
Video by FOX Sports

Week 1 of the NFL season had plenty of important stories worth following, but maybe the most entertaining was the mostly empty stadiums in Los Angeles and Santa Clara. Both the Los Angeles Rams and San Francisco 49ers had sparse crowds for their home openers, and that has not gone unnoticed by the NFL.

Ian Rapoport's report (try and say that fast five times) above shows that the league is clearly worried about the optics of half-filled stadiums. And they should be. It's embarrassing for the league.

This is what the 49ers crowd looked like at the start of the second half in Week 1:

And here's what the Rams crowd looked like in the first quarter:

Here's the thing, the NFL's plans for relocating teams have been hilariously ham-fisted. Moving the 49ers to Santa Clara, 45 minutes from San Francisco was a moronic decision. Levi's Stadium is also positioned so roughly 70 percent of the stadium bakes in the sun with no chance of shade.

Meanwhile, the Rams might actually have decent attendance once they move into their new stadium, but that's a huge gamble. Until then, they'll likely be dealing with sparse crowds at the Coliseum for the next three seasons. It's terrible optics for the NFL to have empty stadiums and absolutely no atmosphere for games.

And we haven't even gotten to the Los Angeles Chargers, who haven't even been able to sellout a 27,000-seat stadium. No one wanted the Chargers in Los Angeles, and it has shown so far. Dean Spanos and his family have consistently claimed they are pleased with ticket sales and "excited" about what's happened with the franchise in LA, but look at the following picture for the team's first ever official game in Los Angeles:

AArTg4j.img
© File Photo File Photo
That was taken just before publishing this piece. Everything in color there is a ticket on sale for the team's Week 2 matchup with the Miami Dolphins. Many of them are "re-sale" tickets that were likely snagged up by brokers when season tickets went on sale. Those brokers will likely aim to sell those seats to opposing fans all season. That graphic is stunning because it comes from just one ticket selling website, and there are several others that each have hundreds of tickets available.

The fact that the Chargers can't find 27,000 fans to fill their tiny soccer stadium home for their opener in a new city would be shocking if you hadn't followed this move from the beginning. But, let's be real: there is zero buzz around the team, fan outreach efforts have been widely mocked and San Diego fans have abandoned the franchise en masse after the way the team's ownership treated its former city. No matter how much lipstick the NFL tries to put on that situation, it's always going to look like a pig.

Empty stadiums are a huge deal to the NFL. Yes, the league makes its money off of TV contracts, but when fans aren't at games it has a detrimental impact on the product. It sends the message that games are boring, uninteresting and that people don't want to have anything to do with them in person. That kind of message hurts the product as a whole.

Not to mention, players don't want to play in empty stadiums, so those franchises will suffer when it comes time to lure free agents. That could lead to some teams being buried at the bottom of the league year after year and creating a cycle that leaves fans even less incentive to show up.

This is a major problem for the NFL. Maybe owners around the league will finally realize that their big, bold stadium and relocation plans should actually have more thought attached to them.

AArTqk8.img
© File photo File photo
 
the actual and only quotes from jeffrey lurie in the article [which dont start until the 11th paragraph in the story.. and never states what question(s) he was asked and give any sort of context to the quotes]:
  1. the 11th paragraph: “You know me,” Lurie said Sunday, after the Eagles beat Washington. “I’m always thoughtful about these sorts of matters.”
  2. the 17th paragraph: “I don’t think anybody who is protesting the national anthem … is very respectful,” Lurie said. “If that’s all their platform is, is to protest the national anthem, then what’s the proactive nature of it?”
  3. the 24th paragraph: “Anybody who wants to do proactive things, to try to reverse social injustice, I’m all in favor of. It has to be respectful,” Lurie said. “It certainly has to respect the military and the people that serve, the women and men that serve our country, emergency responders, whoever that is.”
  4. the 27th paragraph:“With Michael Vick, there was a complete vetting of: ‘How is he as a teammate? What is his character? What is his potential? What is his football intelligence? Can he be a backup?’ ”
  5. the 34th paragraph: “I applaud anybody that can find respectful ways of trying to use their platform in some way to discuss social injustice,” he said.
the headline:
Colin Kaepernick's act is a non-starter for Jeffrey Lurie's Eagles
the article:
http://www.philly.com/philly/sports...social-injustice-anthem-protest-20170913.html

which lead to this, which is obviously causing noise on twitter:


Eagles response:

DJsx6eYWAAAdFTI.jpg:large
 
Man y'all need to research. Ain't wifing an actress anyway, but def not if she did GG :smh: respect yourself
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom