- Nov 15, 2013
- 2,171
- 649
I don't know how you can guess if we win more games Or not Clarkson/porzingis/Ingram
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No Randle and No Ingram. Don't just assume oh yeah... EVERYTHING would be the same.
I'm good with Russell/Clarkson/Ingram/Randle
Over
Clarkson/Porzingis
A 7'3 big that has a growing arsenal of offensive moves, can shoot from anywhere on the floor, and protect the rim.Y'all sold on porzingis being a generational player? He's good, likely great, but lebron type generational?
Sounds like a healthy ralph Sampson to meA 7'3 big that has a growing arsenal of offensive moves, can shoot from anywhere on the floor, and protect the rim.
I'd say that's generational. We have literally never seen anything like that before.
Yeah you're right. Sampson used to cross dudes over and shoot step back three's in his sleep.Sounds like a healthy ralph Sampson to me
Couldn't agree more. Porzingis is THE reason Carmelo Anthony will be heading elsewhere real soon. Dude is a definite star in the making.@Kal-El-8
I don't think we've ever seen a dude at 7'3 that can do these things, the handle, the shot, defense, mobility etc
Most dudes that big are slow and lumbering with no athleticism
Literally nobody can guard him. He pump faked Mozgov and blew by him with the dribble 25 feet from the bucket. He has spin moves that get him past guards/forwards
Really amazing
"Porzingis is beast, which means the Laker youngsters are useless and expendable right away!"
You hope.Totally agree
I hope Dlo and Randle become great
My concern is their skill set
I'm not saying they can't be productive NBA Players.Superstars are like top 5ish players in the league, which are really long odds. So no.
But that doesn't mean they can't be productive NBA players on a winning team.