Perfect example and my point precisely, and I've said it for years. People need to let go of this idea that Nike prices all of its shoes based on manufacturing costs. Nonsense, and it's plain as day to see. Sure, those costs are factored into it, but when it comes to retros, it literally jacks up prices on models and colorways it knows are the most coveted ones. This company charges more for retros of ancient shoes with practically no "tech" in them and mediocre materials than it does for some of its latest, supposedly cutting-edge state-of-the-art models loaded with its supposed latest, state-of-the-art tech. Explain that one if the manufacturing costs are what drive the MSRPs.
Demand, or anticipated demand, is the main factor that drives MSRPs, especially for retros.
And everyone who's making the point these are likely to be relatively limited and selling out, I ain't betting against that whatsoever