longstroke
Banned
- Aug 20, 2012
- 1,461
- 376
Top ten players should be the best all around players, shouldn't they? Or do you think that only scorers should be considered top ten greats? Wilt was an all round player, as was Russ. Oscar was a walking triple double, and Kareem was a defensive stalwart, along with being an offensive force. Doc did it all, and as I stated before, he carried not one, but TWO leagues, while being at the top in rebounding and scoring in both the NBA, and ABA. What you are now seeing with LeBron, is a COMPLETE player, especially since his post game has vastly improved.We're not arguing about who is the best all around player are we?
Kobe Bryant is not in that company, so how can he legitimately be a top ten player? Kidd, while not putting up forty, is a much more efficient player, and there is no doubt about that. With weapons, he is lethal. Give him the weapons that Kobe has had over the years, we'd definitely have him in the Magic Johnson category.
I was at those games in the Meadowlands, as my firm had playoff tickets. I was court side, and while the East was not as competitive as the West, the Piston STILL whupped the Lakers in the finals in '04. No matter who was hurt, from the way you tell it, the Lakers JV could have pulled it out, but they didn't.Here look up the opponent that the Nets played to get to the 2002 NBA Finals. LOL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_NBA_Playoffs
Look at the team the Lakers had to beat to get to Finals in the same year.
Now remind you that the Nets got SWEPT in the Finals lol.
If the Lakers and Nets were to switch division. The Nets would be a 2nd round exit team and the Lakers would have easily sweep every other East team to get to 2002 Finals
They still had Kobe, your top five guy.
I thought he made people better?
Why didn't HE hold Billups?
They kicked the Lakers in the testies!