- 2,406
- 10
The buildings were hit by airliners. Also, the planes put a great deal more weight on the structure of the towers. But of course both of thesethings have nothing to do with the buildings collapsing. Oh wait.... This is logic people, not that hard to understand.Originally Posted by drsfinest72
steel doesnt melt till it reaches 2500 degrees
and jetfuel burns at a little over 1200.
You missed the point. I didnt ask "how come they couldnt put out the fire at the twin towers?"
The point was this: That jet fuel was hot and powerful enough to melt reinforced steel and make buildings that massive collapse, yet normal fire trucks put the fire out like it was a tiny campfire. I know that couldnt have put that out if they even tried.
As far as the fire trucks go - Google some images. The most fire trucks you see at one time is 2. Pictures dont lie, right?
You just refuted your own point. The fire was able to burn for MUCH longer in the towers than it was in the Pentagon. That means that if was ableto weaken the structure for a longer period of time. Add that to the factors I mentioned above and it makes sense, to people that can use logic.