Giving away a gift? What is this?
Giving away a gift? What is this?
Kinda is. I know plenty females that'll reject a dude off his body count. Basically thinking they're a cess pool for STDs. Thing is some of those same girls would just want to play dumb and never ask that question but as far as gossip goes she hear about you smashing certain broads they'd cut you off with the quickness.
A woman is a giving away a gift when she has sex, so if she gives away her gift easily it shows poor character and that usually comes to light in other aspects of her life.
Nobody here is explaining why there is a double standard. Yall just reinforcing it. Putting ({}) on a pedestal and talking about poor character. How does this not apply to men? If a dude smangs a 100 broads females can't look at him sideways for being loose?
W/e your standards are it should go both ways. Whether you putting it on a pedestal or not. Yes men and women are different but you're gonna have to explain what difference between them makes standards for sexual intercourse different for the two that actually makes sense.
Kinda is. I know plenty females that'll reject a dude off his body count. Basically thinking they're a cess pool for STDs. Thing is some of those same girls would just want to play dumb and never ask that question but as far as gossip goes she hear about you smashing certain broads they'd cut you off with the quickness.
A woman is a giving away a gift when she has sex, so if she gives away her gift easily it shows poor character and that usually comes to light in other aspects of her life.
Nobody here is explaining why there is a double standard. Yall just reinforcing it. Putting ({}) on a pedestal and talking about poor character. How does this not apply to men? If a dude smangs a 100 broads females can't look at him sideways for being loose?
W/e your standards are it should go both ways. Whether you putting it on a pedestal or not. Yes men and women are different but you're gonna have to explain what difference between them makes standards for sexual intercourse different for the two that actually makes sense.
Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey
Giving away a gift? What is this?
It goes both ways for me. Ya'll are just stuck up on double standards and social conditioning when it comes to women's sexuality because you want to see her as less of a sexual being than you and not equal. Like I said, it is about how she carries herself and owns it. Some men are threatened by women's sexual prowess. Makes them feel less of a man. That's what it is in a lot of cases. She is a consensual adult, responsible, and clean, and you've had high numbers, then why does her high numbers matter to you? She is a sexual being just like you.
If you expect her numbers to be low, when you are a male !#%@ yourself, you have issues. Women are human beings and like to #+#+ too.
As for me, if a man has high numbers, I admit, it gets to me. But, I am not a hypocrite about it. I like to uphold equality when it comes to it.
Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey
Giving away a gift? What is this?
It goes both ways for me. Ya'll are just stuck up on double standards and social conditioning when it comes to women's sexuality because you want to see her as less of a sexual being than you and not equal. Like I said, it is about how she carries herself and owns it. Some men are threatened by women's sexual prowess. Makes them feel less of a man. That's what it is in a lot of cases. She is a consensual adult, responsible, and clean, and you've had high numbers, then why does her high numbers matter to you? She is a sexual being just like you.
If you expect her numbers to be low, when you are a male !#%@ yourself, you have issues. Women are human beings and like to #+#+ too.
As for me, if a man has high numbers, I admit, it gets to me. But, I am not a hypocrite about it. I like to uphold equality when it comes to it.
If you think this way, then I am saying it should go BOTH ways. Women and men are sexual beings. The only reason you are witholding these views is because you want to look at women as less of sexual beings than you and see them as less equal. It is a power control role you don't want overturned. The man wants to own the woman's sexual power and make sure she lacks it. So yes, sexual prowess.Originally Posted by TruthGetsBusy
you are clueless. If you are a woman and go get smashed whenever you choose your life will be difficult.
1. Any man that has no strings attached sex with you will lose respect for you
2. More than likely he will tell somebody. And those people will also have little respect for you
3. If you mess with dudes in the same circle, work place, or team you will not be respected
A man doesn't want a chick who is looked down upon. Woman are the choosers. A man who gets alot of woman has some kind of quality that allows him to get women. A woman is approached everyday allday so she has to be selective to who she lets in. Manwhores settle down and make the one girl feel special. Rollers have to hide their past or find a sucker to accept them. Big difference.
Its not the same and you know it. P.S.at "Sexual Prowess" . Body count has nothing to do with that. I've never been sexually intimidated by a woman
If you think this way, then I am saying it should go BOTH ways. Women and men are sexual beings. The only reason you are witholding these views is because you want to look at women as less of sexual beings than you and see them as less equal. It is a power control role you don't want overturned. The man wants to own the woman's sexual power and make sure she lacks it. So yes, sexual prowess.Originally Posted by TruthGetsBusy
you are clueless. If you are a woman and go get smashed whenever you choose your life will be difficult.
1. Any man that has no strings attached sex with you will lose respect for you
2. More than likely he will tell somebody. And those people will also have little respect for you
3. If you mess with dudes in the same circle, work place, or team you will not be respected
A man doesn't want a chick who is looked down upon. Woman are the choosers. A man who gets alot of woman has some kind of quality that allows him to get women. A woman is approached everyday allday so she has to be selective to who she lets in. Manwhores settle down and make the one girl feel special. Rollers have to hide their past or find a sucker to accept them. Big difference.
Its not the same and you know it. P.S.at "Sexual Prowess" . Body count has nothing to do with that. I've never been sexually intimidated by a woman
Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey
If you think this way, then I am saying it should go BOTH ways. Women and men are sexual beings. The only reason you are witholding these views is because you want to look at women as less of sexual beings than you and see them as less equal. It is a power control role you don't want overturned. The man wants to own the woman's sexual power and make sure she lacks it. So yes, sexual prowess.Originally Posted by TruthGetsBusy
you are clueless. If you are a woman and go get smashed whenever you choose your life will be difficult.
1. Any man that has no strings attached sex with you will lose respect for you
2. More than likely he will tell somebody. And those people will also have little respect for you
3. If you mess with dudes in the same circle, work place, or team you will not be respected
A man doesn't want a chick who is looked down upon. Woman are the choosers. A man who gets alot of woman has some kind of quality that allows him to get women. A woman is approached everyday allday so she has to be selective to who she lets in. Manwhores settle down and make the one girl feel special. Rollers have to hide their past or find a sucker to accept them. Big difference.
Its not the same and you know it. P.S.at "Sexual Prowess" . Body count has nothing to do with that. I've never been sexually intimidated by a woman
I understand having these sort of views from back in the day, but the role of men and women has changed up quite a bit. You men talking about jumpoffs yet you sure love to use them and fiend for their P for your own dog #%**-%+% behavior.
Who says it is not the same? It is what you make of it.
Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey
If you think this way, then I am saying it should go BOTH ways. Women and men are sexual beings. The only reason you are witholding these views is because you want to look at women as less of sexual beings than you and see them as less equal. It is a power control role you don't want overturned. The man wants to own the woman's sexual power and make sure she lacks it. So yes, sexual prowess.Originally Posted by TruthGetsBusy
you are clueless. If you are a woman and go get smashed whenever you choose your life will be difficult.
1. Any man that has no strings attached sex with you will lose respect for you
2. More than likely he will tell somebody. And those people will also have little respect for you
3. If you mess with dudes in the same circle, work place, or team you will not be respected
A man doesn't want a chick who is looked down upon. Woman are the choosers. A man who gets alot of woman has some kind of quality that allows him to get women. A woman is approached everyday allday so she has to be selective to who she lets in. Manwhores settle down and make the one girl feel special. Rollers have to hide their past or find a sucker to accept them. Big difference.
Its not the same and you know it. P.S.at "Sexual Prowess" . Body count has nothing to do with that. I've never been sexually intimidated by a woman
I understand having these sort of views from back in the day, but the role of men and women has changed up quite a bit. You men talking about jumpoffs yet you sure love to use them and fiend for their P for your own dog #%**-%+% behavior.
Who says it is not the same? It is what you make of it.
I did? Awww, sorry.
I did? Awww, sorry.
Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey
If you think this way, then I am saying it should go BOTH ways. Women and men are sexual beings. The only reason you are witholding these views is because you want to look at women as less of sexual beings than you and see them as less equal. It is a power control role you don't want overturned. The man wants to own the woman's sexual power and make sure she lacks it. So yes, sexual prowess.Originally Posted by TruthGetsBusy
you are clueless. If you are a woman and go get smashed whenever you choose your life will be difficult.
1. Any man that has no strings attached sex with you will lose respect for you
2. More than likely he will tell somebody. And those people will also have little respect for you
3. If you mess with dudes in the same circle, work place, or team you will not be respected
A man doesn't want a chick who is looked down upon. Woman are the choosers. A man who gets alot of woman has some kind of quality that allows him to get women. A woman is approached everyday allday so she has to be selective to who she lets in. Manwhores settle down and make the one girl feel special. Rollers have to hide their past or find a sucker to accept them. Big difference.
Its not the same and you know it. P.S.at "Sexual Prowess" . Body count has nothing to do with that. I've never been sexually intimidated by a woman
I understand having these sort of views from back in the day, but the role of men and women has changed up quite a bit. You men talking about jumpoffs yet you sure love to use them and fiend for their P for your own dog #%**-%+% behavior.
Who says it is not the same? It is what you make of it.
Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey
If you think this way, then I am saying it should go BOTH ways. Women and men are sexual beings. The only reason you are witholding these views is because you want to look at women as less of sexual beings than you and see them as less equal. It is a power control role you don't want overturned. The man wants to own the woman's sexual power and make sure she lacks it. So yes, sexual prowess.Originally Posted by TruthGetsBusy
you are clueless. If you are a woman and go get smashed whenever you choose your life will be difficult.
1. Any man that has no strings attached sex with you will lose respect for you
2. More than likely he will tell somebody. And those people will also have little respect for you
3. If you mess with dudes in the same circle, work place, or team you will not be respected
A man doesn't want a chick who is looked down upon. Woman are the choosers. A man who gets alot of woman has some kind of quality that allows him to get women. A woman is approached everyday allday so she has to be selective to who she lets in. Manwhores settle down and make the one girl feel special. Rollers have to hide their past or find a sucker to accept them. Big difference.
Its not the same and you know it. P.S.at "Sexual Prowess" . Body count has nothing to do with that. I've never been sexually intimidated by a woman
I understand having these sort of views from back in the day, but the role of men and women has changed up quite a bit. You men talking about jumpoffs yet you sure love to use them and fiend for their P for your own dog #%**-%+% behavior.
Who says it is not the same? It is what you make of it.
That's it right here.
That's it right here.
It's already in the thread that you decided to make a poor contribution in. If I don't have to repeat myself at Subway, I damn sure won't be repeating myself on NT.
It's already in the thread that you decided to make a poor contribution in. If I don't have to repeat myself at Subway, I damn sure won't be repeating myself on NT.
