I never knew they had stores. Just seen this brand in TJ Maxx and Marshalls

[sooperhooper]

It's crazy how hard nautica fell off. I think it could still be worn with no ridicule. I had some nice nautica jackets back in the day. A few years ago I was ALL about polo, now that it's become over saturated, I find myself hesitant to even wear something with the polo logo. I'm not big on wearing something that everyone has. Polo is faaaar too widespread nowadays.

I wonder if hilfiger is still doing numbers. That Oprah rumor murked his hype hardbody.

Brands really shouldn't matter as much as they do, it's really just a status thing. Not just clothes, cars also. I guarantee most of you cats wouldn't be caught dead in a kia optima.

 

[41239]

the top one looks like the store in great lakes crossing

 

[sir charles]

I don't know why, but

Hilfiger > Ralph Lauren

I always prefer the flag to the horseman, the H to the big pony, etc. I wear both, but I wear Hilfiger just a little bit more 

 

[freakydestroyer]

90s hilfiger>________

 

[cocotaso1]

90s hilfiger>________

very yes to this. The lotus/f1 and ferrari pieces in particular. grand puba also put them on the map


View media item 222883View media item 222884
i had the blue version of this coat, and thought i was the man after i saw puba w/ it on the album cover.

View media item 222885


and here we have puba in the even more rare and secrete polo hat/hilfiger rugby combo.


View media item 222886

 

[1criollo]

Lands'end and LEC >

The quality is better than RL, no tacky brandings and it's always on sale.

 

[powerballin]

Yeah Nautica fell off. They was hotter than Polo in the Dmv at one point.

 

[lstylez23]

i still rock with a FEW nautica pieces...

 

[cocotaso1]

Lands'end and LEC >

The quality is better than RL, no tacky brandings and it's always on sale.

eddie bauer be holding some heat too. i kinda feel you w/ the branding cuz sometimes its od, but never on quality. imo RL has some of the better quality made stuff outside of specialists in their field ie pendelton for flannel or horween for leather.

on the other hand i have had problems w/ lands end w/ seams ripping, collars and cuffs fraying, stretched collars etc. but that is never really a problem because they have that lifetime guarantee and like you said is always on sale. they do have the best customer service ever for a clothing company tho.

 

[datznasty]

The originator

 

[ninjahood]

if you're a NYC resident, nautica still rocks out..it lost to polo but it was still a valiant fight.

 

[trunks206]

Some of y'all live in extended high school

This.

 

[two zero five]

My aunt bought me a u.s. polo shirt a few years back... forever deadstock

 

[powerballin]

Yes these shirts should fall under "forever deadstock" lol

 

[universityblue]

yall MF'ers hilarious whenever this brand is brought up. What is worse USPA or CHAPS?

Chaps aiight, a division a RL.. Beverly Hills Polo Club is doo-do..

 

[universityblue]

if you're a NYC resident, nautica still rocks out..it lost to polo but it was still a valiant fight.

Nautica and Izod polos and buttondowns on the clearance rack at macy for $15 is always a good look.. Izod made a hella of a comeback imo and quality is good..

 

[snowboardingpanda]

Chaps aiight, a division a RL.. Beverly Hills Polo Club is doo-do..

WAS a Ralph Lauren division.

 

[jonathango]

Chaps aiight, a division a RL.. Beverly Hills Polo Club is doo-do..

WAS a Ralph Lauren division.

what's the story

 

[cocotaso1]

Chaps aiight, a division a RL.. Beverly Hills Polo Club is doo-do..

WAS a Ralph Lauren division.

what's the story

im pretty sure its still owned by ralphie, they just took the by ralph lauren part off the name, made it a khol's house brand and licensed the making of the clothes to someone else. so in effect its no longer a RL division, but its own, its still listed on the RL wiki tho. at least that is how i understand it.

back in the day they used some of the same styles, materials, designs and patterns. they had a similar feel/quality so chaps were esentially rebranded polo clothes. but now they have their own designs, materials etc and have almost no relation to polo.

 

[unknwn]

Late. Very very late.

 

[snowboardingpanda]

im pretty sure its still owned by ralphie, they just took the by ralph lauren part off the name, made it a khol's house brand and licensed the making of the clothes to someone else. so in effect its no longer a RL division, but its own, its still listed on the RL wiki tho. at least that is how i understand it.

back in the day they used some of the same styles, materials, designs and patterns. they had a similar feel/quality so chaps were esentially rebranded polo clothes. but now they have their own designs, materials etc and have almost no relation to polo.

Sorry. You're right. I read online that because of the decline of the brand.

Here's a better explanation.

http://www.askandyaboutclothes.com/forum/showthread.php?38722-Ralph-Lauren-Chaps

 

[alp]

u guys need to get into that purple label ralph lauren

 

[airtostep]

never be caught with this crap.