- 5,456
- 11
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2008
^ Who's the most efficient?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by chrome vapors
Originally Posted by JumpmanFromDaBay
Originally Posted by TheWindScar31
I think his career will mirror Allen Iverson, minus the finals appearances, mvp and multi all-star. Just a scorer.
edit: I have yet to see the man make a game winning shot either. He has had his chances at them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YmqUijrvyqQ1:04
The thing with the Warriors is games don't really go down to the wire that often. You'll see lots of close games in the 4th quarter and then we'll either catch fire and run away with it or completely fold. I can only think of one or two games this year that we've one or loss by 2 points or less.
So yea maybe Monta doesn't make a lot of game winning buzzer beater shots but he stays making HUGE shots and he stays going stupid in the 4th quarter. He's single handedly carried the team to a W sooooo many times in the 4th.
And I agree with OneTrust, Monta is no chucker. Chuckers don't score 46 points on 18-24 shooting, 44 on 15-20, etc etc.
!*+% it, chuckers aren't top 2 at their position in efficiency.
Originally Posted by chrome vapors
Originally Posted by JumpmanFromDaBay
Originally Posted by TheWindScar31
I think his career will mirror Allen Iverson, minus the finals appearances, mvp and multi all-star. Just a scorer.
edit: I have yet to see the man make a game winning shot either. He has had his chances at them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YmqUijrvyqQ1:04
The thing with the Warriors is games don't really go down to the wire that often. You'll see lots of close games in the 4th quarter and then we'll either catch fire and run away with it or completely fold. I can only think of one or two games this year that we've one or loss by 2 points or less.
So yea maybe Monta doesn't make a lot of game winning buzzer beater shots but he stays making HUGE shots and he stays going stupid in the 4th quarter. He's single handedly carried the team to a W sooooo many times in the 4th.
And I agree with OneTrust, Monta is no chucker. Chuckers don't score 46 points on 18-24 shooting, 44 on 15-20, etc etc.
!*+% it, chuckers aren't top 2 at their position in efficiency.
Originally Posted by abovelegit1
Originally Posted by chrome vapors
Originally Posted by JumpmanFromDaBay
Originally Posted by TheWindScar31
I think his career will mirror Allen Iverson, minus the finals appearances, mvp and multi all-star. Just a scorer.
edit: I have yet to see the man make a game winning shot either. He has had his chances at them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YmqUijrvyqQ1:04
The thing with the Warriors is games don't really go down to the wire that often. You'll see lots of close games in the 4th quarter and then we'll either catch fire and run away with it or completely fold. I can only think of one or two games this year that we've one or loss by 2 points or less.
So yea maybe Monta doesn't make a lot of game winning buzzer beater shots but he stays making HUGE shots and he stays going stupid in the 4th quarter. He's single handedly carried the team to a W sooooo many times in the 4th.
And I agree with OneTrust, Monta is no chucker. Chuckers don't score 46 points on 18-24 shooting, 44 on 15-20, etc etc.
!*+% it, chuckers aren't top 2 at their position in efficiency.
Monta isn't top 2 in anything.
Originally Posted by abovelegit1
Originally Posted by chrome vapors
Originally Posted by JumpmanFromDaBay
Originally Posted by TheWindScar31
I think his career will mirror Allen Iverson, minus the finals appearances, mvp and multi all-star. Just a scorer.
edit: I have yet to see the man make a game winning shot either. He has had his chances at them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YmqUijrvyqQ1:04
The thing with the Warriors is games don't really go down to the wire that often. You'll see lots of close games in the 4th quarter and then we'll either catch fire and run away with it or completely fold. I can only think of one or two games this year that we've one or loss by 2 points or less.
So yea maybe Monta doesn't make a lot of game winning buzzer beater shots but he stays making HUGE shots and he stays going stupid in the 4th quarter. He's single handedly carried the team to a W sooooo many times in the 4th.
And I agree with OneTrust, Monta is no chucker. Chuckers don't score 46 points on 18-24 shooting, 44 on 15-20, etc etc.
!*+% it, chuckers aren't top 2 at their position in efficiency.
Monta isn't top 2 in anything.
Originally Posted by nicedudewithnicedreams
What list are you working off of? Lol.
Originally Posted by nicedudewithnicedreams
What list are you working off of? Lol.
Originally Posted by chrome vapors
Originally Posted by abovelegit1
Originally Posted by chrome vapors
Originally Posted by JumpmanFromDaBay
Originally Posted by TheWindScar31
I think his career will mirror Allen Iverson, minus the finals appearances, mvp and multi all-star. Just a scorer.
edit: I have yet to see the man make a game winning shot either. He has had his chances at them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YmqUijrvyqQ1:04
The thing with the Warriors is games don't really go down to the wire that often. You'll see lots of close games in the 4th quarter and then we'll either catch fire and run away with it or completely fold. I can only think of one or two games this year that we've one or loss by 2 points or less.
So yea maybe Monta doesn't make a lot of game winning buzzer beater shots but he stays making HUGE shots and he stays going stupid in the 4th quarter. He's single handedly carried the team to a W sooooo many times in the 4th.
And I agree with OneTrust, Monta is no chucker. Chuckers don't score 46 points on 18-24 shooting, 44 on 15-20, etc etc.
!*+% it, chuckers aren't top 2 at their position in efficiency.
Monta isn't top 2 in anything.
the only SG with a higher efficiency rating is Wade. if you throw PG's in the mix he drops to number 8.
Originally Posted by chrome vapors
Originally Posted by abovelegit1
Originally Posted by chrome vapors
Originally Posted by JumpmanFromDaBay
Originally Posted by TheWindScar31
I think his career will mirror Allen Iverson, minus the finals appearances, mvp and multi all-star. Just a scorer.
edit: I have yet to see the man make a game winning shot either. He has had his chances at them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YmqUijrvyqQ1:04
The thing with the Warriors is games don't really go down to the wire that often. You'll see lots of close games in the 4th quarter and then we'll either catch fire and run away with it or completely fold. I can only think of one or two games this year that we've one or loss by 2 points or less.
So yea maybe Monta doesn't make a lot of game winning buzzer beater shots but he stays making HUGE shots and he stays going stupid in the 4th quarter. He's single handedly carried the team to a W sooooo many times in the 4th.
And I agree with OneTrust, Monta is no chucker. Chuckers don't score 46 points on 18-24 shooting, 44 on 15-20, etc etc.
!*+% it, chuckers aren't top 2 at their position in efficiency.
Monta isn't top 2 in anything.
the only SG with a higher efficiency rating is Wade. if you throw PG's in the mix he drops to number 8.
Bron is #2 using the NBA formula, the link Jumpman posted is guards only. Where are you seeing the actual computations, I can't find them.Originally Posted by Proshares
I don't see how an efficiency chart can be all that doesn't use FGA, FGM, FT's in it's computation. I find it extremely hard to believe that LeBron is not in the top 50 for most efficient players in the league.
Bron is #2 using the NBA formula, the link Jumpman posted is guards only. Where are you seeing the actual computations, I can't find them.Originally Posted by Proshares
I don't see how an efficiency chart can be all that doesn't use FGA, FGM, FT's in it's computation. I find it extremely hard to believe that LeBron is not in the top 50 for most efficient players in the league.
the only SG with a higher efficiency rating is Wade.
the only SG with a higher efficiency rating is Wade.
Originally Posted by chrome vapors
Bron is #2 using the NBA formula, the link Jumpman posted is guards only. Where are you seeing the actual computations, I can't find them.Originally Posted by Proshares
I don't see how an efficiency chart can be all that doesn't use FGA, FGM, FT's in it's computation. I find it extremely hard to believe that LeBron is not in the top 50 for most efficient players in the league.