- Mar 27, 2004
- 18,386
- 34,061
To me it's just a matter of balancing the data and the arguments. We've already gone through many rounds of trials and analysis of whether HCQ is effective. Maybe there's some vast conspiracy by pharmaceutical companies to suppress HCQ's use, but it would require coordination with hospitals and clinicians to fabricate these trials and to be willing to sustain higher death rates.I have no dog in this fight, but if you watched the video there seems to be evidence of efficacy with the proper dosage. Apparently the prior doses being tested were far too high.
We saw what happened with that one study that claimed HCQ was not effective (I think it was published in the Lancet). Within a day or two, people noticed irregularities with the data and I believe it was retracted. And I think that all came down to a single individual (from a data analysis firm), not some massive conspiracy.
My understanding is the good studies on HCQ didn't just show an increase in adverse events. They also failed to show efficacy. Reducing the dosage would reduce both. Until someone shows me a RCT that shows efficacy, it's time to move on from HCQ. Other drugs have shown efficacy despite being involved in fewer studies. When you need 10 or 20 studies to find one that shows HCQ is effective, then you are playing the losing statistical game. Just by random chance, 1 of those 20 studies will show an effect.
If it wasn't for Trump and others making a big deal out of HCQ, we wouldn't have heard anything about it, much like the many other ineffective drugs that have been tried for covid.
That's my perspective... I only watched a couple minutes of the video so my apologies if I'm misrepresenting anything.