- 2,570
- 10
Once we get rid of Curry and Jeffries will be in great position for 2010
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
no no my man. Why dont u read ###@ before u come in here?Originally Posted by marionthebarberian
my 2 cents of the Lebron talk..
Im pretty sure Dallas is the team that can offer the most money. 6/125
The Cavs can go six years at 10.5 percent raises, which would make their maximum deal total about $116.5M, with an average of roughly $19.4M per.
whie ANY other team including the Knicks, Dallas, and ANY other %%+#*++ NBA team that has enough cap space can ONLY offer him the league maximumwhich is a set #. Other than the Cavs NOONE can offer Lebron more than us if we have the cap room to offer a max deal (which we should cause that would makeall this %%+#*++ pointless. In the article it says...
A team such as the Knicks can only do five years, with 8 percent raises, which would make their maximum offer total about $88M, and an average of $17.6M per.
Any outside club with enough cap space to offer that contract can ONLY offer that... nothing more. and that includes %%+#*++ Dallas so i got no%%+#*++ idea where this Dallas nonsense is coming from. People really need to start to understand the NBA salary cap system before they make dumb @%! remarkslike that one. i mean i dont even know where the #*$+ that 6/125 # came from. Cleveland cant even offer him all that. Like did you just make this # up off ofthe top of your head? And even if you did truly believe this was true for some reason dont you think we would already know considering by taking a look at thethread that is ALL we have been talking about????
And even if they dont understand the NBA salary cap at least read the previous articles explaining it before you make foolish statements like that
Next summer Sammy Superstar decides he wants a new team because he feels his old team will never be able to surround him with enough talent to win a title. (Did anyone read D-Wade's comments in that vein earlier this week? Has anybody been following the Chris Bosh saga?) In that summer, unlike most, there will be teams everywhere with enough cap room to give him a max contract, and his old team will know they will be losing Sammy Superstar in free agency while getting nothing back at all.
Meanwhile teams without cap room will try to woo Sammy while persuading his old team to do a Sign-and-Trade. Given the dollar volume of the Kidd and Gortat deals, if Dallas wants Sammy they will have to be one of those Sign-and-Trade teams.
In that process, teams offering Sign-and-Trades will face a huge obstacle. NBA rules require that in getting Sammy via S-and-T they will have to send the old team fairly equal salary. That matching salary may include a lot of talent, and Sammy won't want to come to a crippled team. Meanwhile, the old team won't want to accept and pay the salary for junk. Also, once they lose Sammy they might simply prefer to turn around and shop in the summer of 2010 free-agent pool, and matching salary would hinder that greatly. (For an illustration of how that works, see this summer where Orlando is losing star forward Hedo Turkoglu to free agency, yet is not willing to consider Sign-and-Trades because of the salary they'd have to add to their payroll.)
But Erick Dampier's contract - The DUST Chip -- simply erases all those problems for Dallas.
By using it for the salary match, the Mavs will not gut their team, because his "instant expiring" contract can trade-match a salary up to $16.4475M. One player and done. In addition, the old team merely waives Dampier once the trade is done and ends up with $0 added to their payroll. Dallas of course includes a sizable "tip" to the deal (such as picks and/or cash) along with the DUST, and the old team ends up netting picks and/or cash for a player they were losing anyhow, without any of the normal cap increase that accompanies sign-and-trades.
This could even be an afterthought deal. The old team sees Sammy Superstar ready to sign with another team and says to Dallas, "Hey, we're about to lose Sammy for nothing. We don't want any of the S-and-T offers we're getting. Send us That DUST Chip, and we'll help get him to Dallas."
What's in it for Sammy? A lot. In that scenario, he can be added to a Mavs team that's 100-percent intact and that can pay him significantly more money than any of those pure free-agent offers. For example, with LeBron, Wade, and Bosh, a Sign-and-Trade can be six-years and $125.1 million, while an offer from a team with cap space could only be five years and $96.1 million.
There isn't a better core for Bron than the Knicks core..sorryOriginally Posted by THE GR8
And yes that also makes more sense that Dallas would make more sense as the primary option for a recepitant if a sign and trade goes down because it works for Lebron because he goes to a team that can pay him more than anybody AND has a great core intact alreadyy with Dirk, Kidd, Howard, ets. (hes also a Cowboys fan like hes a Yanks fan**#!%+@ frontrunner also used to be a Bulls fan btw) and it works for Cleveland cause not only do they get the salary space they would get if a team just signed Lebron outright but they ALSO get mad draft picks and $!#$ (not that draft picks would be that great on a team with Lebron and Dirkmaybe they would be able to get a nice cheap young guy as well though.
lets not let our homerism take over....Originally Posted by Supafly122
There isn't a better core for Bron than the Knicks core..sorryOriginally Posted by THE GR8
And yes that also makes more sense that Dallas would make more sense as the primary option for a recepitant if a sign and trade goes down because it works for Lebron because he goes to a team that can pay him more than anybody AND has a great core intact alreadyy with Dirk, Kidd, Howard, ets. (hes also a Cowboys fan like hes a Yanks fan**#!%+@ frontrunner also used to be a Bulls fan btw) and it works for Cleveland cause not only do they get the salary space they would get if a team just signed Lebron outright but they ALSO get mad draft picks and $!#$ (not that draft picks would be that great on a team with Lebron and Dirkmaybe they would be able to get a nice cheap young guy as well though.
Originally Posted by BangDak
lets not let our homerism take over....Originally Posted by Supafly122
There isn't a better core for Bron than the Knicks core..sorryOriginally Posted by THE GR8
And yes that also makes more sense that Dallas would make more sense as the primary option for a recepitant if a sign and trade goes down because it works for Lebron because he goes to a team that can pay him more than anybody AND has a great core intact alreadyy with Dirk, Kidd, Howard, ets. (hes also a Cowboys fan like hes a Yanks fan**#!%+@ frontrunner also used to be a Bulls fan btw) and it works for Cleveland cause not only do they get the salary space they would get if a team just signed Lebron outright but they ALSO get mad draft picks and $!#$ (not that draft picks would be that great on a team with Lebron and Dirkmaybe they would be able to get a nice cheap young guy as well though.
Originally Posted by Supafly122
There isn't a better core for Bron than the Knicks core..sorryOriginally Posted by THE GR8
And yes that also makes more sense that Dallas would make more sense as the primary option for a recepitant if a sign and trade goes down because it works for Lebron because he goes to a team that can pay him more than anybody AND has a great core intact alreadyy with Dirk, Kidd, Howard, ets. (hes also a Cowboys fan like hes a Yanks fan**#!%+@ frontrunner also used to be a Bulls fan btw) and it works for Cleveland cause not only do they get the salary space they would get if a team just signed Lebron outright but they ALSO get mad draft picks and $!#$ (not that draft picks would be that great on a team with Lebron and Dirkmaybe they would be able to get a nice cheap young guy as well though.
Chicago is pretty dangerous..I wouldn't even joke like thatOriginally Posted by maxtempo96
if someone puts a hit out on curry or jeffries we're all good with this signing correct?
god if thats ALL we end up with...Originally Posted by I NaSmatic I
I think at the very least, the Knicks will be able to get Amare.
He loves D'Antoni, the system and the spotlight too much.