- 94
- 10
- Joined
- May 14, 2002
just saw on espn they said there have only been two other playoff games in history where two players have scored atleast 40 points and 10 boards. jordan -barkely, and jerry west with someone else i forgot.. pretty cool tho
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
i'm not really in the mood to get into it, but I still disagree. people are expecting way too much out of Denver right now. the hype is outof control. we just got out of the first round for the first time in 15 years and people are acting dissapointed that we didn't sweep round 2? give me abreak... how many teams in this situation sweep? not many. it wasn't a bad game for Denver, it was just a game. and game 5 is next, and that's whatit is.Originally Posted by lakersmets49ers
Originally Posted by denverairforce
haha, good luck with that. and to the guy saying that it was a bad game for Denver, I completely disagree. you're giving the Mavs no credit. they are, believe it or not, a decent team. they have the ability to go off, as evidenced last night. Dirk could not be stopped, even with solid defense being played on him. the Mavs played like they wanted the win last night. however, the Nuggets played a good game too, and without one of their main bench guys and team defenders. and it was on the road. don't blow the Nuggets' success out of proportion, we are an NBA team like any other team and anybody can lose on any given night (see: Lakers Rockets game 4). I also have to give credit to Barea cuz that guy was cuttin' up the defense in the lane all night. they need to get a body in front of dude. he was going to the hole all night with ease. otherwise, defense was good, offense was good, Dallas' was just better last night. that's all there is to it.
It's a bad game because its a game they should have won and had numerous chances to win. Like I said when you have a chance to close a team out you wanna do it right there not to allow the possiblity of anything out of this world to happen. When I was saying bad game, I wasn't talking about how the team played because Denver played decent yesterday. I mean it's a bad game because it's a game they should have won but didn't
Had they got blown out it's easier to say F it forget about it and focus on the next game but when you blow chances in the game you tend to think about it more.
hey they got blown out what else is there to say but its easier to get over getting blown out then if they had the lead all game and battier hita game winner at the end of the game,Originally Posted by Executive76
The nerve of a Lakers fan talking about a BAD loss
Originally Posted by denverairforce
i'm not really in the mood to get into it, but I still disagree. people are expecting way too much out of Denver right now. the hype is out of control. we just got out of the first round for the first time in 15 years and people are acting dissapointed that we didn't sweep round 2? give me a break... how many teams in this situation sweep? not many. it wasn't a bad game for Denver, it was just a game. and game 5 is next, and that's what it is.Originally Posted by lakersmets49ers
Originally Posted by denverairforce
haha, good luck with that. and to the guy saying that it was a bad game for Denver, I completely disagree. you're giving the Mavs no credit. they are, believe it or not, a decent team. they have the ability to go off, as evidenced last night. Dirk could not be stopped, even with solid defense being played on him. the Mavs played like they wanted the win last night. however, the Nuggets played a good game too, and without one of their main bench guys and team defenders. and it was on the road. don't blow the Nuggets' success out of proportion, we are an NBA team like any other team and anybody can lose on any given night (see: Lakers Rockets game 4). I also have to give credit to Barea cuz that guy was cuttin' up the defense in the lane all night. they need to get a body in front of dude. he was going to the hole all night with ease. otherwise, defense was good, offense was good, Dallas' was just better last night. that's all there is to it.
It's a bad game because its a game they should have won and had numerous chances to win. Like I said when you have a chance to close a team out you wanna do it right there not to allow the possiblity of anything out of this world to happen. When I was saying bad game, I wasn't talking about how the team played because Denver played decent yesterday. I mean it's a bad game because it's a game they should have won but didn't
Had they got blown out it's easier to say F it forget about it and focus on the next game but when you blow chances in the game you tend to think about it more.
Denver's better off closing out at home in front of their fans anyway. can't wait.
Realtalk...... Teams usually dont get swept in the playoffs, yes i know Cleveland swept their first 2 series, but they are in the east andeveryone is really just stepping stones for Cleveland to be in the finals but they won't sweep next round. Anyways, its one game that Denver played badlyyet they still had a chance to win it again at the end, and for Dallas to be in it Dirk had to go for 44 and Anderson didnt play. Klieza cost them the game andyou better believe he wont get minutes like that on Wednesday.Originally Posted by maldonado
regardless its ONE game. doesnt matter if you win a series 4-1, and you had ONE bad game. nobodys gonna focus on the ONE bad game vs. the Mavs when we're knee deep in the Western Conference finals.
holla at me after its said and done.
Noted.Originally Posted by maldonado
regardless its ONE game. doesnt matter if you win a series 4-1, and you had ONE bad game. nobodys gonna focus on the ONE bad game vs. the Mavs when we're knee deep in the Western Conference finals.
holla at me after its said and done.
so the lakers aren't winning a championship, that's what you're saying... since they couldn't even get to a 3-0 record to have acloseout game and have lost 2 against a beat up houston team. but i'm not saying anything bad, I'm just giving you some constructive criticism. theLakers need to sweep their series if they are true contenders for the championship. you know, i am neither a fan or a hater of the lakers, I don't care ifthey win or lose, just stating the obvious.Originally Posted by lakersmets49ers
Originally Posted by denverairforce
i'm not really in the mood to get into it, but I still disagree. people are expecting way too much out of Denver right now. the hype is out of control. we just got out of the first round for the first time in 15 years and people are acting dissapointed that we didn't sweep round 2? give me a break... how many teams in this situation sweep? not many. it wasn't a bad game for Denver, it was just a game. and game 5 is next, and that's what it is.Originally Posted by lakersmets49ers
Originally Posted by denverairforce
haha, good luck with that. and to the guy saying that it was a bad game for Denver, I completely disagree. you're giving the Mavs no credit. they are, believe it or not, a decent team. they have the ability to go off, as evidenced last night. Dirk could not be stopped, even with solid defense being played on him. the Mavs played like they wanted the win last night. however, the Nuggets played a good game too, and without one of their main bench guys and team defenders. and it was on the road. don't blow the Nuggets' success out of proportion, we are an NBA team like any other team and anybody can lose on any given night (see: Lakers Rockets game 4). I also have to give credit to Barea cuz that guy was cuttin' up the defense in the lane all night. they need to get a body in front of dude. he was going to the hole all night with ease. otherwise, defense was good, offense was good, Dallas' was just better last night. that's all there is to it.
It's a bad game because its a game they should have won and had numerous chances to win. Like I said when you have a chance to close a team out you wanna do it right there not to allow the possiblity of anything out of this world to happen. When I was saying bad game, I wasn't talking about how the team played because Denver played decent yesterday. I mean it's a bad game because it's a game they should have won but didn't
Had they got blown out it's easier to say F it forget about it and focus on the next game but when you blow chances in the game you tend to think about it more.
Denver's better off closing out at home in front of their fans anyway. can't wait.
championship teams win closeout games, i'm just stating the obvious. i could care less if they win or lose im neither a fan or hater of denver so what they do doesn't concern me, i'm a fan of melo and billups but thats it.
hollllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllaOriginally Posted by HybridSoldier23
Noted.Originally Posted by maldonado
regardless its ONE game. doesnt matter if you win a series 4-1, and you had ONE bad game. nobodys gonna focus on the ONE bad game vs. the Mavs when we're knee deep in the Western Conference finals.
holla at me after its said and done.
You will be holla'd at when your team eats the Lakers.
game 3 was actually a far worse game by the Nuggets than game 4, but Dallas played 10x better in game 4 than in game 3. also, the only reason LKgot minutes was because of Bird being out and Karl running the small rotation more often. as long as Bird is healthy on Wednesday, LK will be collecting a lotmore splinters.Originally Posted by AllenIversonFan01
Realtalk...... Teams usually dont get swept in the playoffs, yes i know Cleveland swept their first 2 series, but they are in the east and everyone is really just stepping stones for Cleveland to be in the finals but they won't sweep next round. Anyways, its one game that Denver played badly yet they still had a chance to win it again at the end, and for Dallas to be in it Dirk had to go for 44 and Anderson didnt play. Klieza cost them the game and you better believe he wont get minutes like that on Wednesday.Originally Posted by maldonado
regardless its ONE game. doesnt matter if you win a series 4-1, and you had ONE bad game. nobodys gonna focus on the ONE bad game vs. the Mavs when we're knee deep in the Western Conference finals.
holla at me after its said and done.
Its over on Wednesday mark it down, Denver by 15+. Bring on the Lakers or Rockets.
Originally Posted by denverairforce
so the lakers aren't winning a championship, that's what you're saying... since they couldn't even get to a 3-0 record to have a closeout game and have lost 2 against a beat up houston team. but i'm not saying anything bad, I'm just giving you some constructive criticism. the Lakers need to sweep their series if they are true contenders for the championship. you know, i am neither a fan or a hater of the lakers, I don't care if they win or lose, just stating the obvious.Originally Posted by lakersmets49ers
Originally Posted by denverairforce
i'm not really in the mood to get into it, but I still disagree. people are expecting way too much out of Denver right now. the hype is out of control. we just got out of the first round for the first time in 15 years and people are acting dissapointed that we didn't sweep round 2? give me a break... how many teams in this situation sweep? not many. it wasn't a bad game for Denver, it was just a game. and game 5 is next, and that's what it is.Originally Posted by lakersmets49ers
Originally Posted by denverairforce
haha, good luck with that. and to the guy saying that it was a bad game for Denver, I completely disagree. you're giving the Mavs no credit. they are, believe it or not, a decent team. they have the ability to go off, as evidenced last night. Dirk could not be stopped, even with solid defense being played on him. the Mavs played like they wanted the win last night. however, the Nuggets played a good game too, and without one of their main bench guys and team defenders. and it was on the road. don't blow the Nuggets' success out of proportion, we are an NBA team like any other team and anybody can lose on any given night (see: Lakers Rockets game 4). I also have to give credit to Barea cuz that guy was cuttin' up the defense in the lane all night. they need to get a body in front of dude. he was going to the hole all night with ease. otherwise, defense was good, offense was good, Dallas' was just better last night. that's all there is to it.
It's a bad game because its a game they should have won and had numerous chances to win. Like I said when you have a chance to close a team out you wanna do it right there not to allow the possiblity of anything out of this world to happen. When I was saying bad game, I wasn't talking about how the team played because Denver played decent yesterday. I mean it's a bad game because it's a game they should have won but didn't
Had they got blown out it's easier to say F it forget about it and focus on the next game but when you blow chances in the game you tend to think about it more.
Denver's better off closing out at home in front of their fans anyway. can't wait.
championship teams win closeout games, i'm just stating the obvious. i could care less if they win or lose im neither a fan or hater of denver so what they do doesn't concern me, i'm a fan of melo and billups but thats it.
Co-sign.Originally Posted by Executive76
Your team lost in blowout without Yao or Tracy....and home loss without T Mac...you don't have any room to talk about bad losses
Originally Posted by denverairforce
you're still acting like the Nuggets lost the game on purpose or something. you don't seem to comprehend the fundamental spirit of competition in professional basketball. I'll leave it at that. say whatever the heck you want, I'm done. I'm an idiot, I don't know what I'm talking about, my team's gonna get hurt, whatever. I'm over it. go back to your lakers thread and worry about them, since they are 2-2 and the Nuggets are 3-1.
I know what you're saying sounds good and probably feels good to say, but how can you believe it to be true?Originally Posted by lakersmets49ers
bottom line is your supposed win close out games and anyone who disagrees obviously isn't a fan of a team who has won something of importance before.
Originally Posted by TraSoul82
I know what you're saying sounds good and probably feels good to say, but how can you believe it to be true?Originally Posted by lakersmets49ers
bottom line is your supposed win close out games and anyone who disagrees obviously isn't a fan of a team who has won something of importance before.
Do me a favor and complete these sentences for me so that I may understand your point:
The Celtics didn't win their first close out game in the first round of the 2008 playoffs, therefore ______________________________________ .
The Celtics didn't win their first close out game in the 2008 Finals, therefore ________________________________ .
The Lakers have won all of their close out games of the last 2 years yet they have no championship during this period, therefore ________________________ .
Mark Cuban sent the tape in to the league for review.Originally Posted by shatterkneesinc
the league wont even look at it