- 41,820
- 43,337
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2002
I think "population problem" is the PC way of saying "too many stupid people are having babies.."
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Drive out of a metropolitan area or even look down when your in the air.. What do you see? Land, land, land. Overpopulation my ***There's actually more than enough land , people just all choose to live in the same area
I think it was posted here before that the entire earth population could fit in Texas and the population density would be like Manhattan
Idiocracy isn't a movie, it's a prophecy.reality imitating art?
I think "population problem" is the PC way of saying "too many stupid people are having babies.."
pretty much. Man is corrupt, therefore there is no way to do it properly unless were ready to hand over something so important to Artificial intelligence, and even then the already existing biases will play a part in decisions. So no, theres no way to do itNo because there's no effective, fair way to implement this. Politics is corrupt. You're going to put the choice who gets to have a child or not in the hands of those same politicians?
Waiting for someone to take "offense" at this and call this "prejudice/discrimination."People on welfare before kids shouldn't be allowed to have them. If you cannot support yourself then you shouldn't be able to pop out more government dependents. Won't ever happen though.
Waiting for someone to take "offense" at this and call this "prejudice/discrimination."
I don't understand the morality argument. You could just as easily argue that by not caring about the future generations, we are being immoral.Humans have tried restricting who can reproduce for years now. Forced sterilization, china's one child policy etc have all pretty much failed. Not to mention the morality of it.
Not necessarily... a true artificial intelligence will be "birthed" from scratch and will have no pre-existing or implemented tendencies. That's what separates a true AI from what exists today, right now we have a bunch of programmed responses and reactions, which will yield predictable responses and thinking. If we were ever able to attain a completely artificial intelligence capable of drawing its own conclusions and making its own choices without (keyword: without), it could give us an unbiased result.pretty much. Man is corrupt, therefore there is no way to do it properly unless were ready to hand over something so important to Artificial intelligence, and even then the already existing biases will play a part in decisions. So no, theres no way to do it
So you're saying people that grew up on assistance shouldn't be able to have kids?People on welfare before kids shouldn't be allowed to have them. If you cannot support yourself then you shouldn't be able to pop out more government dependents. Won't ever happen though.
Nah, only the rich and middle class should be able to procreate. Sometimes this site manSo you're saying people that grew up on assistance shouldn't be able to have kids?People on welfare before kids shouldn't be allowed to have them. If you cannot support yourself then you shouldn't be able to pop out more government dependents. Won't ever happen though.
People on welfare before kids shouldn't be allowed to have them. If you cannot support yourself then you shouldn't be able to pop out more government dependents. Won't ever happen though.
Waiting for someone to take "offense" at this and call this "prejudice/discrimination."
If you can't support yourself and your child on your own, then you shouldn't be having children... period... how someone will actually try and argue this is beyond stupid...
That's not what he said.So you're saying people that grew up on assistance shouldn't be able to have kids?People on welfare before kids shouldn't be allowed to have them. If you cannot support yourself then you shouldn't be able to pop out more government dependents. Won't ever happen though.