- Jan 8, 2006
- 30,560
- 33,906
Good. Didn't expect them to.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm thinking this is trade bait. Do you pass on a great player in exchange for +2 good ones?“@RaidersBeat: Reggie McKenzie said the #Raiders won't pass on a "great" receiver to wait for a "good" receiver later in the draft.”
“@RaidersBeat: Reggie McKenzie said the #Raiders won't pass on a "great" receiver to wait for a "good" receiver later in the draft.”
I'm thinking this is trade bait. Do you pass on a great player in exchange for +2 good ones?
Jay Glazer @JayGlazer 2h
And Oakland doesn't take him at 5 either. Me? Personally? I looooove what he does out there. But I don't make a pick
Expand
On Manziel
Vic Tafur @VicTafur
Heard more than one comparison of OT Greg Robinson to Orlando Pace. Overpowering athlete. If Khalil Mack and Sammy
Sammy Watkins are gone by the time the #Raiders pick at No. 5, Robinson is a great consolation prize.
It's one of the reasons I don't think Oakland should trade back. There are, in my mind, a pretty clear cut class of 5 great players: Jadeveon Clowney, Mack, Watkins, Robinson and Jake Matthews ... and then a slight dropoff.
Oralando Pace not bad wouldn't be against it.
If we did trade with DAL you guys are cool with the 16th pick?
If we drop down to 16 for a 1st and 2nd. I would be pissed. Swap 1st with a 2nd, 4th and a future 2nd round pickIf we got a 1st and 2nd that would give us 4 players in the top 75 . Need Jerry to call Reggie
Kory Sheets got arrested for Weed in Canada
3 this year and at least 1 (2nd round) next year. I doubt we could get a next years 1st round.We need at least three picks to make a trade worthwhile, and those three would have to be high.
Final comment, stop beating Pitt even when you are "bad". Seriously have their number
when Chris Carr took Big Ben to the house