ice city fc
Banned
- Mar 6, 2013
- 5,031
- 2,109
The Raiders are SIGNIFICANTLY better talent wise than last year. Night and day. I understand that some are long in the tooth, but talent wise, they are leagues above what we've had.Even with a bunch of solid pick ups, I really don't think we're much more talented than last year, if at all.
We should be more consistent defensively but we also should have have easily won 6 games in 2013.
This season all comes down to how well Schaub does. Been trying to say it but both Pryor and McGloin were far from the worst thing under center in the NFL this past season.
Not trying to downplay what's been a great offseason but in terms of raw talent it's really not a night and day difference from last year.
Pash rush will be more consistent and will be an actual factor for us this year, which will go a long way, but where we really gained was experience and locker room presence more so than talent.
Woodley won't even be playing LB for us. Last year's LB corp was solid and still is.
Some good solid pickups at corner but I'm not at all sure Carlos Rogers is much of an upgrade over Jenkins.
I actually think we've downgraded at RB. Jennings > *
We were in almost every game last year. We didn't roll over for anyone except the Eagles and the Chiefs.
I know I'm in the minority here but last years roster was not at all devoid of talent.
Are we more talented, yes, a better team, definitely. But aside from the front four, a healthy Tyvon, and Matt Schaub aka the biggest mystery grab bag of all time, this is basically the same team. The difference in raw talent is not night and day.
Last edited: