AIr jordan XXXV first info.

[si3n4]

The DNAs look better in person than I expected. That said, the colorway could be way better with more black.

 

[Sizzla]

Was already on it...

This but with grey outsole and grey fade eclipse plate similar to black metallic 5’s would have been it for me.

 

[sneeker]

Was already on it...

these should have been the Warrior colorway. just curious how they would look with the red side panels.

 

[thapointguy]

This in the 35 would look good with black midsole of course lol

 

[NToweG]

these should have been the Warrior colorway. just curious how they would look with the red side panels.

I'm not sure if it'll match right since the panels go into the midsole. The warrior panel and the bred bottom wont be the same red.

 

[barrebaby]

Unboxed my DNA's today, I'm a bit disappointed. Maybe I expected more, don't know something feels off... besides the sole . Kinda wish I just went for the PF version, but not knowing the fit and possibly not being able to return them, it wasn't worth spending an extra 50 to 70 bucks. Still my favorite 35 so far. I'm satisfied, just feel like they could have done something else to make them really great. I still feel like my 34s are going to get more action than these.

 

[sneeker]

Unboxed my DNA's today, I'm a bit disappointed. Maybe I expected more, don't know something feels off... besides the sole . Kinda wish I just went for the PF version, but not knowing the fit and possibly not being able to return them, it wasn't worth spending an extra 50 to 70 bucks. Still my favorite 35 so far. I'm satisfied, just feel like they could have done something else to make them really great. I still feel like my 34s are going to get more action than these.

the fit?

 

[barrebaby]

the fit?

Not sure I understand the question. I meant I wasn't sure how the PF version would fit me, would I go to my typical size or need to change my size?.? My feet are jacked up, skinny with finger toes, also my left foot is larger than my right. So I always kinda settle in the middle at 10.5 (1s and 2s I need 10s though). Reality of it is I need closer to an 10.5 on my left, and closer to a 10 on my right most of the time, and I ain't buying two pairs to make a near mate set.

Or where you asking how my pair fit? Just put them on in the house for tonight, they feel and look really long on foot, am I the only one? But solid and comfortable. The thicker materials feel more sturdy than the 34s which is a big upgrade IMO. I'm gonna UNDS them tomorrow, and see how they feel all day.

 

[T_p_Hill]

DNAs dropped in today, pretty excited to work on these although a bit let down they went with alcantara or some other synthetic over suede. Its an upgrade from a performance perspective but just thought it was suede since they used actual suede and nubuck on the Warriors.

 

[NToweG]

Unboxed my DNA's today, I'm a bit disappointed. Maybe I expected more, don't know something feels off... besides the sole . Kinda wish I just went for the PF version, but not knowing the fit and possibly not being able to return them, it wasn't worth spending an extra 50 to 70 bucks. Still my favorite 35 so far. I'm satisfied, just feel like they could have done something else to make them really great. I still feel like my 34s are going to get more action than these.

Missing some color? Lack of in-person design?

 

[dmoney23444]

White sole is a must in the dna

 

[sneeker]

Not sure I understand the question. I meant I wasn't sure how the PF version would fit me, would I go to my typical size or need to change my size?.? My feet are jacked up, skinny with finger toes, also my left foot is larger than my right. So I always kinda settle in the middle at 10.5 (1s and 2s I need 10s though). Reality of it is I need closer to an 10.5 on my left, and closer to a 10 on my right most of the time, and I ain't buying two pairs to make a near mate set.

Or where you asking how my pair fit? Just put them on in the house for tonight, they feel and look really long on foot, am I the only one? But solid and comfortable. The thicker materials feel more sturdy than the 34s which is a big upgrade IMO. I'm gonna UNDS them tomorrow, and see how they feel all day.

sorry, I was asking what seems to be off with your purchase? I was suspecting the fit. you got me worried since if they fit like the 34 lows, that would be a bummer.

 

[sneeker]

I'm not sure if it'll match right since the panels go into the midsole. The warrior panel and the bred bottom wont be the same red.

hmmmmm.....

 

[NJzapato]

Got mine in went .5 size up with dress socks not 1:1 fit but maybe 1/4 inch room In the toe box on my right shoe. The shoe is kinda of pointy. It’s feels light and fit feels good don’t feel the insole of the arch digging in to my foot like the 34. Wish the tongue was reflective. Wondering if 10.5 is a better fit. Not as excited about it as the 34 when I first got it, but like comparing the old to the new models.

 

[airsully23]

Found my 11.5 in PF for $220 shipped
2 day delivery

 

[sneeker]

Found my 11.5 in PF for $220 shipped
2 day delivery

good for you.

 

[spoonmanofthehour]

DNAs dropped in today, pretty excited to work on these although a bit let down they went with alcantara or some other synthetic over suede. Its an upgrade from a performance perspective but just thought it was suede since they used actual suede and nubuck on the Warriors.

Here we go with JB being cheap again. Freaking jerks. They make all of this money and they can’t give us real suede.

 

[3god]

Wow the lack of suede is a big time miss on the DNAs. That was the biggest selling point - the more premium materials on this model. I still think the colorway gets way too much criticism. It is still the best looking 35. Definitely needs the White sole though.

 

[airsully23]

 

[GrizzlyAnimal]

34 all over again lol

 

[charmcitykid]

i have to agree these look way better in person. i was wrong, this shoe does have SOME casual appeal. they are very comfy and light on feet. materals are decent. the 34 is still lighter. they are very similar. the 35 has a better fit.

 

[charmcitykid]

aesthetically, the 34 looks better. it's the simplicity of the 34 design for me. comfort and fit easily goes to the 35. overall... 35 >> 34

 

[sneeker]

Wow the lack of suede is a big time miss on the DNAs. That was the biggest selling point - the more premium materials on this model. I still think the colorway gets way too much criticism. It is still the best looking 35. Definitely needs the White sole though.

well, I would say it's acceptable for me. I didn't like that thin condom-like material on the 34s.

 

[sneeker]

aesthetically, the 34 looks better. it's the simplicity of the 34 design for me.

except that thin material that they used.

 

[3god]

well, I would say it's acceptable for me. I didn't like that thin condom-like material on the 34s.

Well, anything is better than the materials on the 34.