Air Jordan III OG Black Cement returns Feb 2018 - Nike Air on the back

What’s the sizing?

  • 1/2 Size Big (buy a half size down)

    Votes: 57 8.4%
  • True to Size (buy your true size)

    Votes: 551 80.9%
  • 1/2 Size Small (buy a half size up)

    Votes: 73 10.7%

  • Total voters
    681
Even the 94 is completely different than the Og. No retro 3 has the low EP, bullet shape, or hidden tongue liner.
 

Attachments

  • AD8FEA21-0141-4CB0-A852-4BF76CB13C35.jpeg
    AD8FEA21-0141-4CB0-A852-4BF76CB13C35.jpeg
    836 KB · Views: 123
honestly only popping in here to hear about allocation and numbers. let me get two pairs as long as mine don't comer screwed up im good.
 
These will be my first pair of 3's so I'm in for 1 pair regardless of how different they may be from the actual 1988 OG Black Cements. Would be nice to get a nice pair with lower EP on the toe but I won't nitpick. As long as I get a pair that isn't screwed in the QC department I'll be content.
 
So you mention all that at first

and then insult me and others our opinions and statements

You’re the only one in here crusading against the Original shoe. A lot of people in here have voiced their disappointment in the execution of this retro. Each and every opinion has a place in here criticizing this release. The same goes for the people who like this shoe and plan on purchasing it. The problems arise when the fanboys in here get upset that this isn’t a circle jerk admiration for this shoe. I swear anyone who claims anyone is crying are the type of people who need safe spaces created for them because their echo chamber isn’t being complied with.
 
Ogs wack to me too. Thick ep and tongue liner are what makes 3 to me. but it’s all respect to those that enjoy them.
 
We all know the 88, 94, and 01 are different. None of them had that inflated bulky toe box with a banana curve either. It’s like a virus that’s infected most of the retros. It’s really sad. I remember a time when that’s how you knew the shoe was fake. Now that means they’re legit.
 
What are your thoughts M marztharealist and @ninjahood

Everything on those fakes is atrocious. The plastic (I'm not really sure it is) leather, Nike Air heel logo looks very sloppy, just every damn thing. I'm sorry Aquamanjay_ Aquamanjay_ , I'm just not seeing what the rest of y'all are seeing. They look like what I'd imagine if Jordan's completely fell off, and ended up being sold at stores, like Wal-Mart. :lol: The only thing that looks even remotely decent, is the elephant print, on the toe box. The actual shoes don't look much better, either. This is just all my opinion, though. Like I said before, the only thing that looks great on the retail's, are the heel logos.
 
Same conversation will apply when the black red 4 eventually drops.

Yeah, but the next retro will be more of a take down model of 1999 Retro.

21689021_741888226008328_8548933459802849280_n.jpg

21689187_1925568920993761_1395688530943934464_n.jpg


All that will be changed is the material of the upper, and the Jumpman's will be replaced with Nike accents. Nothing will be done about the compressed, low top banana shape, lack of ankle support, and paper thin,shin guard, that they pass off as a tongue. Oh, the netting and bottom eyelets will be corrected, but none of what I mentioned, should've never been tampered with, in the first place.

19764390_391068711290298_1811544319857786880_n.jpg

6tag_010617-155247.jpg

The 2012's don't even look right on feet...

|l

Not trying to change the subject mods. It was mentioned, so I decided to comment about it. These are my personal pics, from my Instagram, BTW.
 

Attachments

  • 18889184_1462781323789673_8770529849308610560_n.jpg
    18889184_1462781323789673_8770529849308610560_n.jpg
    444.8 KB · Views: 17
Back
Top Bottom