- Jul 28, 2012
- 5,947
- 10,331
Damn good look. Grabbed a pair for 199 shipped.If you sign up as new customer using your email, you can get 15% off. I got a pair for $199 shipped.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Damn good look. Grabbed a pair for 199 shipped.If you sign up as new customer using your email, you can get 15% off. I got a pair for $199 shipped.
I think its purely supply, high stock on a $245 jordan. Nike/JB need to slow down on these release schedules. Space it out moreLet's be honest, these are pretty fire. I think people are broke, and the money hasn't started flowing like 2020/2021... But it's about too. ....monetary easing just kicked off ..money printers go brrrr.. once that happens people will circle back.
Yeah they need to stop tbh. Sadly pumping out too much, too frequently is killing the appeal, at least to me. A ma should stop now. We've seen enough from them, same with travsI think its purely supply, high stock on a $245 jordan. Nike/JB need to slow down on these release schedules. Space it out more
I guess I'm confused cause I always thought there was zero difference other than the marketing on the box. A true women's release doesn't go above M10.5 and every AMM release does.Instead of releasing these as womens kicks, why doesn't they just release them as regular sizes. You could still market them in the same way. The smaller womens sizes are normally the ones that sit the longest.
I guess I'm confused cause I always thought there was zero difference other than the marketing on the box. A true women's release doesn't go above M10.5 and every AMM release does.
I've got like 9 pairs of AMM Jordans though and I can't recall any of them being a bad fit on foot or running narrow overall. Granted I'm not a wide footer to begin with.There could be slight variations in the last. My unscientific sense is that AF1 w12’s fit slightly more narrow than AF1 m10.5’s. Although I’ve never dragged out calipers…
I've got like 9 pairs of AMM Jordans though and I can't recall any of them being a bad fit on foot or running narrow overall. Granted I'm not a wide footer to begin with.
That's the other thing, most of their collabs have a slimmed down fit due to materials and most have the satin sockliner and quilted insoles. The 4's (and then 5's) have always struck me as a take on the old Heder Schemes which were meant to fit more like a dress shoe than a classic J.Yeah, I don’t have enough Jordans to give you my opinion there. Plus, I’m not sure if there is a standard Jordan last. It feels like every pair of 4’s I have fits differently. Those Fire Red’s… whew
I guess I'm confused cause I always thought there was zero difference other than the marketing on the box. A true women's release doesn't go above M10.5 and every AMM release does.
I think they just make too many of those sizes, but you hit the TWG discord and there's a surprising amount of women buying and wearing them over there. I'm just not sure it makes any sales difference whether they're marketed one way or the other. Sneaker people know they're as much a men's shoe as women's. Let's be real though, when you get down to size 5-6 you're talking about a lot of teenagers and kids. The price point is a bigger detriment to sales there than anything IMO.They're a women's release but they just do it in extended sizing. That's why it doesn't matter.
It's a cute marketing gimmick but it doesn't seem to be resonating, because those 5's and 6's aren't doing well.
I think only shoe that seemed to fit narrow was the 4 because of the quilted liner and it was snug on the pinky toe. These new 4s seemed to improve on the liner.
Looks like Nike went ahead and pulled the remaining stock from the site.
Yep! Back and now on NDC.Dey bach