- Dec 25, 2003
- 43,235
- 28,446
Don't expect T-Mac. I don't see us making any moves unless we're moving Jeffries and/or Eddy for an expiring, and I honestly don't see Houstontaking either.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yeah its a reach but the play in question really exposed how bad it is ....... after watching him do one move then pass the ball or jack up a shot..... I knew it was shaky but after seeing him on that fast break it was nba lvl badOriginally Posted by BangDak
gallos handles arent as good as we would hope, and should def. work on it, but to say he has no handles is a reach.
Originally Posted by THE GR8
I dont get whatsup with this theory that AI would have hurt Gallo. I man what do you think hurts him as a player more. A guy taking a few more shots per night (while doing it effectively may I add), or a PG with absolutely no skill and cannot take it to the basket, and is therefore physically inept at the dribble penetration kickout, therefore making Gallo SWARMED by defenders everytime he touches the ball since defendes dont respect him on the drive???
idk about yall but i choose the latter. AI would put up a few more shots per night, which imo would be good cause right now Gallo isnt ready to be the #1 more like a 2 or a 3 and a dead on shooter. But defenders HAVE to respect AI off the dribble (unlike Duhon) and therefore they would have to back up on Gallo to help out in the paint. We have NONE of that right now. Part of the reason why are offense is so inept and just consists of chucking 3s.
Why would you NEED to hand the ball over to Duhon, Nate, Douglas, or Hughes if A.I. is playing in the same game? These guys wouldn't darecomplain about touches if A.I. was on the squad. And I'm sure A.I. knows he's on the tail end and can't do it himself.Originally Posted by BangDak
Originally Posted by THE GR8
I dont get whatsup with this theory that AI would have hurt Gallo. I man what do you think hurts him as a player more. A guy taking a few more shots per night
(while doing it effectively may I add), or a PG with absolutely no skill and cannot take it to the basket, and is therefore physically inept at the dribble
penetration kickout, therefore making Gallo SWARMED by defenders everytime he touches the ball since defendes dont respect him on the drive???
idk about yall but i choose the latter. AI would put up a few more shots per night, which imo would be good cause right now Gallo isnt ready to be the #1 more
like a 2 or a 3 and a dead on shooter. But defenders HAVE to respect AI off the dribble (unlike Duhon) and therefore they would have to back up on Gallo to
help out in the paint. We have NONE of that right now. Part of the reason why are offense is so inept and just consists of chucking 3s.
dont get me wrong, i want AI. all for it as a matter of fact. its not necessarily taking shots away from gallo, but right now, duhon, nate, douglas, hughes, all need the ball in their hands to suceed. theres just not enough of the ball to get all of them "on fire" and running smoothly. nate+duhon needs to go. as much as i like nate, douglas is playing way better and can actually be part of the future if he keeps developing well.
and handles isnt a huge thing. he can work on it.
Find a way to put all of this in 2 paragraphs or less
I'm serious
i dont think you are
Unpossible.Originally Posted by YEEUPP
Find a way to put all of this in 2 paragraphs or less and send it to Knicks Management
I'm serious
i think you mean 2+pages right? right.Originally Posted by YEEUPP
To the Gr8,
since you can type ur !%@ off.. I say you type up a well structured letter to Dolan/Walsh, explaining about the whole Iverson thing
How Duhon sucks, don't drive, Iverson wll drive and be able to draw defenders to kick out to gallo
How we need a consistent scorer, he can be cut easily IF something did go wrong, its only one year
They owe it to the fans after we allow the rebuilding process. why not win this season while rebuilding..
Iverson has lot to prove.. We have games to win.
Find a way to put all of this in 2 paragraphs or less and send it to Knicks Management
I'm serious
Originally Posted by HarlemToTheBronx
Unpossible.Originally Posted by YEEUPP
Find a way to put all of this in 2 paragraphs or less and send it to Knicks Management
I'm serious
i dont think you areOriginally Posted by Al3xis
Find a way to put all of this in 2 paragraphs or less
I'm serious
So you're saying we should of hired Avery Johnson?Originally Posted by BangDak
i think you mean 2+pages right? right.Originally Posted by YEEUPP
To the Gr8,
since you can type ur !%@ off.. I say you type up a well structured letter to Dolan/Walsh, explaining about the whole Iverson thing
How Duhon sucks, don't drive, Iverson wll drive and be able to draw defenders to kick out to gallo
How we need a consistent scorer, he can be cut easily IF something did go wrong, its only one year
They owe it to the fans after we allow the rebuilding process. why not win this season while rebuilding..
Iverson has lot to prove.. We have games to win.
Find a way to put all of this in 2 paragraphs or less and send it to Knicks Management
I'm serious
and that bolded part. i say this every damn game. if i can see it, i dont understand why mike cant preach this.
look at the rockets. down by 10 in the 4th with 2 minutes left, yet they manage to catch up. why? they play hard, with effort, and DEFENSE.
why cant mike do this? at some point, fans like me wont be able to take this anymore.
I mean this quote just pisses me off. You really might as well say "We dont want to win." Which i would have NO problem with if...Originally Posted by THE GR8
Coach Mike D'Antoni said Iverson would have come in and played 40 minutes a game, taking playing time away from others who need to be on the court to continue their growth.
"We just didn't think right now we wanted to have that dominant force on the team right now," D'Antoni said.