- 43,197
- 28,360
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2003
This season started out so bad. Things are looking up now, though.
.
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by pr0phecy718,
- Start date
- 11,640
- 506
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2005
As long as he keeps playing this way we can really convince teams to take Curry too in a package deal
sirius lee handsome
Banned
- 9,918
- 12
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2009
It was really chafing him to give credit where it was due.
- 1,307
- 12
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2005
exactly!, i think nate is and will always be a great spark off the bench, but it seem like dantoni doesnt really want him on the team if he cantplay him for a month......., to ensure maximum money for the free agents a trade of nate packaged with curry or jefferies might not be that bad
- 12,102
- 1,410
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2008
give me a break with this stuff.
A rotation was having success, he went with it until it stopped....then he changed things up tonight.
Actions speak louder than words. Him leaving Nate on the floor for extended time in both halves and clearing everything out for him late, is all you guysshould have wanted or cared about. Not a post game quote saying "I'm sorry."
yeeupp
Banned
- 5,697
- 166
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2009
Our next two games are vs. IND & CHA
if we beat CHA, do we have the spot over them if we're tied at the end of the season?
if we beat CHA, do we have the spot over them if we're tied at the end of the season?
- 29,630
- 1,862
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2003
yeah these wins are meaningless if we don't beat who we need to. and i still think it was more than 50% personal with nate and dantoni. nate said he'shere to stay in the interview, i dunno is things will end up that way but i'd be happy with him
- 43,197
- 28,360
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2003
Sig stolen.
big j 33
Supporter
- 35,917
- 16,639
- Joined
- May 31, 2006
I was thinking that exact same thing HTTB... I've been rocking this same sig since I joined
, time to ditch MLK for the Knicks
- 25,984
- 19,214
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2003
when are you going to give nate credit? even before he scored 40 tonight i knew he never should be benched... hes clearly the best bench player the knicks gotand best pg too... duhon is garbage and shouldnt be starting... i would even put hughes and douglas over him any day in the lineup...the knicks had a goodmonth without nate last month but thats not saying much... the knicks are a better team when he is playing..
- 14,132
- 285
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2004
Man, please no let down on Sunday.
- 12,102
- 1,410
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2008
Indiana's 2nd of a back to back.
If they wana be serious about playoffs, like I said the other day...it's time to break that door down.
If they wana be serious about playoffs, like I said the other day...it's time to break that door down.
- 4,404
- 11
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
Word.
Hats off to Donnie and Mike though.
This is not the same Knicks organization we've seen in the last decade.
- 4,973
- 19
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2005
Please
Nate EARNED all his PT tonight. And he EARNED another game to showcase himself by his performance tonight.
yeeupp
Banned
- 5,697
- 166
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2009
IND are on a 8 game losing streak, IF we lose
big j 33
Supporter
- 35,917
- 16,639
- Joined
- May 31, 2006
he can handle himself, but Allen clearly said on the very last page, that Nate played great and praised him.
Tonight Nate gets the credit and it's much deserved. But it's pretty simple. The team was playing poorly, Nate got benched, the team won, then wefaltered, Nate got put in, and played great and won. If we keep winning with Nate in, he won't get benched again.
- 43,197
- 28,360
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2003
Originally Posted by Big J 33
I was thinking that exact same thing HTTB... I've been rocking this same sig since I joined, time to ditch MLK for the Knicks
Your sig is definitely outdated broham.
big j 33
Supporter
- 35,917
- 16,639
- Joined
- May 31, 2006
- 43,197
- 28,360
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2003
Oh hai, nice sig.
- 11,640
- 506
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2005
Very true. When we try to trade Curry or Jefferies to other teams, they always want us to include David Lee or Wilson Chandler or Gallinari intothe mix. Obviously we would like to keep all those players, but realistically I just don't see that happening. We're going to have to give up someother players into the process, and right now Nate is sky high in value and a lot of teams could use someone to give the team a spark.
Honestly, if we want to keep Robinson so bad then why can't we just re-sign during the offseason? The same can be said about David Lee as well. I might bemissing something, but that's how I see it.
We all know we need to clear up more cap space for this summer, and the only way to do that is if we move Jefferies and Curry.
I looked into some trades that can be done, and I think our best bet would be to trade for T-Mac. He wants to play and we need his contract. In return theRockets get a Center, Nate, Jefferies, and Wilson (main reason this trade makes sense for Houston).
The trade would also work without Chandler involved.
- 4,404
- 11
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
Knicks fans need to be banned from every NBA trade machine on the internet....
- 2,805
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2006
Thanks for the inspiration
- 11,605
- 143
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2005
dead %++
- 9,086
- 11
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2006
BangDak approves of those two trades nycknicks105
.
- 7,805
- 247
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2006
Originally Posted by HarlemToTheBronx
