- 29,630
- 1,862
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2003
eddy curry won't be returning. who didn't see that coming?
.
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by pr0phecy718,
- Start date
sirius lee handsome
Banned
- 9,918
- 12
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2009
Wilson Chandler has no business taking midrange shots even. He's like 4 for 17 or something in this game. He has the athleticism to take it to the basket,but is wasting his opportunities taking shots everyone knows won't go in. Meanwhile D'Antoni seems to just go with the flow
- 14,132
- 285
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2004
Is there a reason Duhon can't come off the bench though?
Seriously?
Seriously?
- 12,102
- 1,410
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2008
So how many unproductive minutes has Jordan Hill really had?
No reason for him not to be getting 15-20 minutes a night at least now
small, small sample but..
14-22, 31 points, and 12 boards in 54 minutes of total play..when he's been out there he hasn't been awful. certainly can do whatever the hell JaredJeffries brings to the table.
No reason for him not to be getting 15-20 minutes a night at least now
small, small sample but..
14-22, 31 points, and 12 boards in 54 minutes of total play..when he's been out there he hasn't been awful. certainly can do whatever the hell JaredJeffries brings to the table.
sirius lee handsome
Banned
- 9,918
- 12
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2009
Wasn't the reason that Iverson wasn't signed because D'Antoni thought it would prevent the young players' development? The only thing stiflingtheir development at this point is D'Antoni keeping these dudes on the bench until the second half of the fourth quarter while allowing a couple ofdo-nothings like Duhon and Chandler to start.
- 35,215
- 26,872
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2005
yea its time to give hill some extended quality minutes
- 14,132
- 285
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2004
Eh, I guess I jumped the gun on Hill. Point taken, but that's the least of the problems.
Start Douglas, and bring Nate off the bench. Both are easily more effective on offense/DEFENSE than Duhon. It's amazing how much Douglas does with littletime.
Start Douglas, and bring Nate off the bench. Both are easily more effective on offense/DEFENSE than Duhon. It's amazing how much Douglas does with littletime.
- 11,605
- 143
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2005
true story.
hill/douglas needs more burn.
hill/douglas needs more burn.
- 2,103
- 10
- Joined
- May 8, 2006
duhon is the only one that can somewhat manage the offense.
i dont see how he is going to come off the bench any time soon.
i dont see how he is going to come off the bench any time soon.
- 2,938
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2006
who else thinks Chandler should be benched in favor of Harrington or Hill?
- 1,785
- 48
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2009
They REALLY need to reconsider signing Iverson...
- 11,640
- 506
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2005
gabe gotti
Banned
- 533
- 12
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2008
I ain't watch the game and I'm glad I didn't. I'm about to call my cable company see if I can have MSG blocked or something.
- 30,673
- 5,703
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2002
- 12,102
- 1,410
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2008
i like this..
- 7,084
- 45
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2007
that team would be fun to watch, a lot of running, somewhat reminds of me how gsw are currently playing. as in their recent play.
what i want to see is douglas-hughes-gallo-lee-darko
nate, al, chandler, hill off the bench.
duhon+jefferies+curry can kick rocks.
i wouldnt mind putting all 3 of them for the sole purpose of trading them, although i dont see it happening.
honestly, im willingly to part with chandler, nate, and lee at this point. trade chandler while his value is high. if dude wont drive to the rim and decides tokeep bricking, fine by me. douglas can easily replace nate, and same with lee being replaced by hill. at least i know that if we have the young guys playing, iwouldnt have to watch this *@#!+@## next year.
what i want to see is douglas-hughes-gallo-lee-darko
nate, al, chandler, hill off the bench.
duhon+jefferies+curry can kick rocks.
i wouldnt mind putting all 3 of them for the sole purpose of trading them, although i dont see it happening.
honestly, im willingly to part with chandler, nate, and lee at this point. trade chandler while his value is high. if dude wont drive to the rim and decides tokeep bricking, fine by me. douglas can easily replace nate, and same with lee being replaced by hill. at least i know that if we have the young guys playing, iwouldnt have to watch this *@#!+@## next year.
- 30,673
- 5,703
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2002
for those that still care to watch...it's almost game time
- 4,925
- 461
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2009
this is pretty sad....
im going to bed....
- 30,673
- 5,703
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2002
- 7,084
- 45
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2007
we cant lose...
sergio's gettin more burn in this game then entire games normally.
a sign of the kings trying to shop him towards us?
sergio's gettin more burn in this game then entire games normally.
a sign of the kings trying to shop him towards us?
yeeupp
Banned
- 5,697
- 166
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2009
Jeffries+Duhon for Rodriques+Thomas?Originally Posted by BangDak
we cant lose...
sergio's gettin more burn in this game then entire games normally.
a sign of the kings trying to shop him towards us?
- 13,094
- 2,121
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2001
61 points at the half for Sac?
On top of that, Knicks are 28th in the L in defense right now.
They also finished..... yep, 28th last year.
- 1,785
- 48
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2009
In all honesty this is the worst year yet.
They were bad under Isiah, but not THIS bad...
They were bad under Isiah, but not THIS bad...
- 10,057
- 2,199
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2001
D'Antoni STAYS yelling at Nate Rob
yeeupp
Banned
- 5,697
- 166
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2009
Originally Posted by SHUGES
61 points at the half for Sac?
On top of that, Knicks are 28th in the L in defense right now.
They also finished..... yep, 28th last year.
Insert Darko in the lineup and i guarantee we'll move up.. I wanna know WTFFs up with Mike not playin centers.. Don't he say how many easy layups teamsget on Lee? smh
