- 703
- 1,038
2024 NIKE SB DUNK THREAD_____GRs and QSs added
- Thread in 'Nike Retro' Thread starter Started by elcerrito91,
- Start date
- 18,086
- 8,627
my top 10 list is
1. SOMP
2. YOTH
3. Beijing
4. Cali
5. Tiff
6. Premier
7. Royal J-pack
8. QS
9. Bao
10. Stars
1. SOMP
2. YOTH
3. Beijing
4. Cali
5. Tiff
6. Premier
7. Royal J-pack
8. QS
9. Bao
10. Stars
- 411
- 196
If I wanted to buy shoes because of their quality I'd be buying nothing but designer shoes
- 2,834
- 1,562
yeah, now adays purchases arent made based on quality, or else nike would be in trouble.
- 18,086
- 8,627
and the quality of the tiffs aren't that bad
while it is a downgrade its nothing i can hate on. even rocked them during the weekend
- 8,829
- 1,146
Lets not start this debate again...
- 5,390
- 2,593
I get what you're saying but plenty of good quality kicks dropped this year in SB Land. To say that quality doesn't matter just doesn't make sense to me. Nike may not have the highest quality products (IE that ain't Italian Leather) but that doesn't mean they don't drop good quality kicks... And to say that the Tiffs are ANYWHERE near LM1's, or SOMP's, or Cali's etc etc etc is just ridiculous. Maybe my point went over your head but I was just saying the Tiffs have the worst quality of any shoe I've ever owned. If you bought because OMZG TIFFS (and I'm not saying you specifically) you're probably a HB.
Again, I respect the opinion but just completely disagree. No one is buying uncomfortable kicks and gonna be happy with that decision. We all want comfy shoes no?
- 5,390
- 2,593
Not much of a debate.
Step 1) Take Tiff Lows (or really ANY Nike shoe of all time with leather on it)
Step 2) Take Tiff Highs
Step 3) Compare
Step 4) Throw away Tiff Highs
Note* So the fewest number of butts get hurt, this is a joke/hyperbole post. But the quality on the tiffs does seriously suck.
Last edited:
- 1,744
- 445
Quality of the Tiffs sucked, but I still copped nonetheless because I've always loved the colorway and I may be one of the few that prefer highs over lows.
- 3,458
- 2,069
Pet peeve of the day.
Calling Diamond dunks Tiffs.
My take on it though. Yes materials suck, but colorway is dope.
Calling Diamond dunks Tiffs.
My take on it though. Yes materials suck, but colorway is dope.
- 5,390
- 2,593
I love highs and was stoked at a re-release of the Tiff colorways because of the prices of the lows at the time (gives everyone a chance to own some Tiffs). But when I got them in hand, meh.
- 5,390
- 2,593
Eh, the lows were dubbed Tiffs, only makes sense the highs would follow the same format. So what if they're actually Diamond Supply Co. x Nike SB Dunk Highs? Much easier to say tiff highs or lows. It's like the OOP discussion we had a few weeks back. It might annoy you when people say OOP, but what would you prefer? Should we say "he sold it to me for retail + ship + ship + fees without earning a dime for himself" or "he gave me the oop"
- 3,458
- 2,069
Give me the oop on those diamonds.
- 1,704
- 1,316
- 15,173
- 13,361
purely hype
- 5,390
- 2,593
Always gotta be difficult.
Give me the oop on those diamonds.
Yeah you could do that. It's not entirely accurate but it works (Now I'm just splitting hairs haha sorry)
Now you got me thinking about other ways to say oop. Damnit
Last edited:
. But they are a nice CW which is why people are able to look past it since many people dont wanna pay resale on the lows
- 5,593
- 6,567
- 338
- 223
Thanks for calling my attention to these. Might just cop.
- 111
- 61
I don't really dig the calis but this shot makes me think otherwise
- 4,704
- 12,943
EDIT: just noticed the description says 'LOW'
Last edited:
- 9,407
- 8,127
anyone have an idea what this could be?
something tells me its these...
Can't be its those lows let me find a pic real quick
EDIT THESE
Although I like those highs a lot more
Last edited:
- 5,390
- 2,593
If I got a pair of Tiffs for free, I'd keep em. I probably wouldn't wear them often if ever, but I'd keep them. Paying $120 for flimsy plastic (how did they get away with calling that leather?!) made me want to sell them.@DanVSMan I get what you are saying and maybe I don't mind my pair as much since I got them as extra in a trade. But they are a nice CW which is why people are able to look past it since many people dont wanna pay resale on the lows
- 5,390
- 2,593
But those don't have any "glacier ice" in them. I know the model is incorrect, but @Dcypoe81 's find was more likely haha
- 9,407
- 8,127
Glacier Ice could be be referring just to the white.
Glaciers aren't really clear like an icy sole they look white
Last edited:
