Well throw up a picture of these early pictures, and compare them to pictures of the 2016 blk/metallic 5,s, and then tell me if that’s the same material to y’all, because it’s clesrly not. I just really hope the official versions are nothing like what we’re seeing in these pictures. It’s more of a nubuck material on these early pairs, just darker compared to the last blk/infrared. The nubuck on the last blk/infrared 6 release compared to the real Durabuck used on the last blk/metallic 5,s are nothing alike. I understand if it doesn’t matter to some of y’all.
But going from what we we’re first served to the furry ashy bs they’ve been recently throwing at us on 5,s and 6,s, it’s a slap in the face to the consumers to correct the problem on a different model, then they don’t correct a future model release just because they can. I hope that these are just early pairs with that the suede look. If not, this is a huge troll job compared to how they fixed the material problem with the 5,s by going back to was always suppose to be used on them. I get most of y’all dont care, and would throw $300 to JB/Nike with ashes and dust literally tossed in boxed with them, because of thirst for whatever they release.
But there’s some of us that where around when these models where made way better. But there shouldn’t be any excuses right now, because they corrected the 5,s. So why not just do it right on the 6,s. Their just trolling with suede material like always. Like I said, theirs nothing Durabuck about the material in these early pics. I don’t care if they slap the name on the box.