mr marcus
Banned
- May 3, 2010
- 26,572
- 5,415
Nebraska football is an American past time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think OU's a bad job. I think it's a top 10 job like I said. I just dont know if between Gibbs and Stoops it was a job every coach wanted like it may be now.OU still had alot talent under Gary Gibbs and John Blake
Def top 25. Arguably top 15. They have the facilities, they recruit the west coast well now without even trying, and the Pac12 is a stronger conference than the B1G and BigXII.
I don't know how well the job pays, but I don't know that you can name 25 better jobs in the country?
Ain't nobody said they didddddddd!Nebraska and Michigan aren't on the same playing field. Saying that Baylor/Clemson caught up to Nebraska is one thing, but I do not believe that they've caught up to Michigan.
If every school is splitting that money evenly, it's not a situation where the CFB royalty can afford fancy training facilities and the other schools just got to make do. Everybody is splitting bread now. Baylor just built a new stadium.
Back in the day sustained program success was determined by tradition, money, and exposure. Then of course the abiliy to get/keep a coach who knew what he was doing. Now with TV money split evenly, you don't have to go to a Nebraska or Michigan. You can get those facilities, TV exposure, and recruits at Baylor and Clemson too. It closed the gap.
Name 25 better jobs man.Def top 25. Arguably top 15. They have the facilities, they recruit the west coast well now without even trying, and the Pac12 is a stronger conference than the B1G and BigXII.
I don't know how well the job pays, but I don't know that you can name 25 better jobs in the country?
All kinds of wrong.
OU still had alot talent under Gary Gibbs and John Blake
I don't think OU's a bad job. I think it's a top 10 job like I said. I just dont know if between Gibbs and Stoops it was a job every coach wanted like it may be now.
Back in the day sustained program success was determined by tradition, money, and exposure. Then of course the abiliy to get/keep a coach who knew what he was doing. Now with TV money split evenly, you don't have to go to a Nebraska or Michigan. You can get those facilities, TV exposure, and recruits at Baylor and Clemson too. It closed the gap.
So that considered, what aside from pointing to the 90s makes Nebraska any more attractive than an Oregon or LSU?
I'm not riding for Stanford or anythingStanford isn't a top 25 job . Harbaugh and shaw have just been phenomenal
recruits don't give a **** about diversityYes kids want to play in the SEC but Texas will be in the mix for great recruits becauseof Austin and its more diverseit's Texas
5 star isn't going to a D 1AA period ....miss me with that inherited slick talk you're doingRecruits care about diversity. They want white yams.
No 5 stars are going to Prarie View A&M.
Recruits care about diversity. They want white yams.
No 5 stars are going to Prarie View A&M.
They aren't going to Connecticut either....Recruits care about diversity. They want white yams.
No 5 stars are going to Prarie View A&M.
Recruits care about diversity. They want white yams.
No 5 stars are going to Prarie View A&M.
5 star isn't going to a D 1AA period ....miss me with that inherited slick talk you're doing
Why?Ann Arbor and ****, the entire state of Michigan however are bleeding Nike green tonight.
Stanford isn't a top 25 job . Harbaugh and shaw have just been phenomenal
Why?
Michigan always roots for "Michigan Men".
Real talk, most people from here are happy for RR.As fun as Rich Rodriguez winning the Pac-12 while UM searches for a new coach sounds....