- Oct 10, 2013
- 43,425
- 42,998
What is this rose IS this and rose IS that? Throw a WAS in there.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Barkely was a better player than Dirk & KG. He was better rebounder and passer with equivalent scoring ability.
Malone; debatable.
Duncan; GOAT at 4.
Yeah dudes seeing Russell acting like rose didn't carve his way to an MVP already. They'll be comparable in a few years if Russell doesn't learn to calm the **** down.
For their careers, Barkely averaged 11.7 RPG w 3.9 APG versus KG's 10.3 RPG and 3.9 APG. I like both but if I had to choose, I'd choose Barkley. FWIW Barkley averaged more points but KG was a better team defender.How the hell was Barkley a better passer and rebounder than KG?Barkely was a better player than Dirk & KG. He was better rebounder and passer with equivalent scoring ability.
Malone; debatable.
Duncan; GOAT at 4.
I'm not going to speak on Dirk because I can't do so objectively.
Rose's MVP year and Westbrook that same year compared:
http://www.sbnation.com/nba/2011/3/24/2068524/derrick-rose-nba-mvp-russell-westbrook
For their careers, Barkely averaged 11.7 RPG w 3.9 APG versus KG's 10.9 RPG and 3.9 APG. I like both but if I had to choose, I'd choose Barkley.
Barkely was a better player than Dirk debatable.
Duncan; GOAT at 4.
How the hell was Barkley a better passer and rebounder than KG?
I'm not going to speak on Dirk because I can't do so objectively.
Oh....I'm sorry. I just won't believe my own eyes anymore. I'll take note of that. Thanks. Just say KG > Barkley and argue reasons why. No issue with that. I just can't stand when we become slaves to analytics. I understand we're in the age of ESPN crazy stats, but the eye test has to account for something now. You can adjust and skew numbers for days on end to make it fit a particular argument.Ahh the raw look at numbers but you simply can't do that.For their careers, Barkely averaged 11.7 RPG w 3.9 APG versus KG's 10.9 RPG and 3.9 APG. I like both but if I had to choose, I'd choose Barkley.Barkely was a better player than Dirk debatable.
Duncan; GOAT at 4.
How the hell was Barkley a better passer and rebounder than KG?
I'm not going to speak on Dirk because I can't do so objectively.
Kevin Garnett played 17 years and Barkley played 12.
Through Kevin Garnett's first 12 years he averaged more rebounds and assists.
Him still trying to struggle along in his twilight years is hurting his overall numbers.
Good try though
So my point stands on athleticism...?
it's the basis of S&T manWhy do y'all argue over hypothetical choices for a hypothetical question
it's the basis of S&T man
You're really splitting hairs when u compare those 2 athletically.
If there is a difference, it's negligible
I know but to me it's only part of the story. You can't quantify style of play and eras. That's where the arguments come in. Stats are the only tangible that goes on, but watching also tells a story. It's fun to a certain point to argue it. That's why Xbox and Playstation are funIt's like a google battle at that pointit's the basis of S&T man
Who can google the most stats the fastest and put them together in a sentence
This thread hates D Rose until further noticeDudes really forgot about Rose though ? It's either that or y'all just started watching basketball.
... Ok? That wouldn't be outlandish eitherYou're really splitting hairs when u compare those 2 athletically.
If there is a difference, it's negligible
Then you gotta put wall in the same category if its negligible
I know but to me it's only part of the story. You can't quantify style of play and eras. That's where the arguments come in. Stats are the only tangible that goes on, but watching also tells a story. It's fun to a certain point to argue it. That's why Xbox and Playstation are fun
... Ok? That wouldn't be outlandish either
Oh no, not at all. This entire thread is just an online version of a barbershop argument. It's all goodI know but to me it's only part of the story. You can't quantify style of play and eras. That's where the arguments come in. Stats are the only tangible that goes on, but watching also tells a story. It's fun to a certain point to argue it. That's why Xbox and Playstation are fun
Hey man, don't let me stop y'all
Having this discussion with my boys
View media item 994376
I pick Stockton , Wade (06 Prime Wade ) , Lebron , Kg , Olajuwon = 10
Who would you pick ?
This thread hates D Rose until further noticeDudes really forgot about Rose though ? It's either that or y'all just started watching basketball.
Thank you. Rose was amazing for two seasons, no denying that. Now he's a *****. No mental toughness to try and come back. Just flat out disrespecting his team.What is this rose IS this and rose IS that? Throw a WAS in there.