- Nov 4, 2003
- 29,630
- 1,863
Not to mention he didnt do anything with them. How you gonna compare and say oh well kobe had to play with a garbage team.... To which in all intent purposes was partially his fault to begin with.... And didnt even win with them... I mean i could see the argument if dude made a finals ah something with the team....or was wcf or something. Hell to be honest iverson might of had it just as bad or worst then any one of them....
Ppl act as if the lakers are the bucks/cavs etc... this team/yrs were garbage and kobe had a part in why these teams were garbage. It aint like it was bad ownership/staff etc... because the lakers proved for decades they can/will make the moves needed to build championships...
To compare that to a team who never one anything in the history of their existence is ubsurd
Lol what?
This is ridiculous.
So a great football player is gonna choose to go to Dallas over Seattle with their measly one championship?
Just admit you got the timeline wrong and la wasnt doing ****.
Chicago ain't won before or after Michael I don't see anyone choosing them over Miami even though they have more rings. Who is running to the celtics?
Last edited: