- Aug 14, 2004
- 1,002
- 10
Hold up did he really say dat
I gotta go read dis !+$$
I gotta go read dis !+$$
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trelvis Tha Thrilla wrote:
Yes, the Mountain West is the best conference in college football.
You lettin those over-exaggerating, roller coaster idiots at ESPN Radio rub off on you my man...
STOP IT... The North has been down some, but Nebraska, Missouri, and Kansas are all good programs that are getting better... Colorado will be a good program again when they find a decent coach... The North has four legitimate high-major programs in the division, as many as the entire MWC...Originally Posted by Nowitness41Dirk
The MWC wants a bid as it stands, they gotta show better than just TCU, BYU and Utah, because none of those other schools bring anything to the table financially or from a nationally relevant perspective...Originally Posted by Nowitness41Dirk
Originally Posted by Nowitness41Dirk
Originally Posted by Nowitness41Dirk
Trelvis Tha Thrilla wrote:
Yes, the Mountain West is the best conference in college football.
I posted it from an article dumb $#%. It wasnt my opinion.Originally Posted by GUNNA GET IT
The MWC is the best conference in football.
shut that dumb %$%# up.
Originally Posted by Nowitness41Dirk
Trelvis Tha Thrilla wrote:
Yes, the Mountain West is the best conference in college football.
A clear bias?Originally Posted by Trelvis Tha Thrilla
ESPN doesnt even support non BCS conferences so I dont know where you are getting that from. They have a clear bias and it shows.
Point 1... Missouri and Kansas are more relevant Nationally than anybody in the MWC outside of the top 3... Frankly, I'm not sure TCU evenbelongs with Utah and BYU. Like I said, those guys have done it. TCU hasn't... Baylor right now is better than ANYBODY in the MWC outside of the top 3...Say what you want about Texas A&M and Colorado, but those are schools that have been power programs in the past and still hold FAR more relevancenationally than anybody in the MWC after the top 3, even when they're bad. When they're good, they're superior programs to TCU, BYU, and Utahtoo...Originally Posted by Trelvis Tha Thrilla
The North is trash. You arent going to convince me that Missouri and Kansas are any better than the Top 5 in the MWC. Nebraska hasnt been relevant for a while. The Big XII is nothing outside Texas, OU, and occasionally OK State or Tech. And dont act like the bottom of the Big XII isnt bad with Baylor, A&M, Iowas State and Colorado.
So what do the other conferences bring outside their Big 3? The Pac 10 consists of USC and 9 other teams. The Big 10 has Ohio State, Penn State, and Michigan if its a good year and nothing else. The Big East is a complete joke. The Big XII has Texas, OU, and one other and the rest are middle to bottom of the pack. I can go on and on. These other conferences are putting up more than 3 contenders.
So because TCU lost a conference game in 06 that makes us less legitimate? TCU mopped up BYU last year, does that mean BYU is no longer legitimate? TCU has beat Utah and BYU. Do you forget that we won this conference the first year we were in it? You act like we haven't beaten Utah or BYU before.
And Utah didnt kick the crap out TCU last year. Did you watch the game? The score was 13-10. The frogs should have won the game if they didnt blow 2 field goal chances.
Not making excuses because they have blown it in recent years, just pointing out that you still havent named a legitimate reasons as to why the MWC isnt in the BCS cartel.
I'm not sure TCU even belongs with Utah and BYU. Like I said, those guys have done it. TCU hasn't... Baylor right now is better than ANYBODY in the MWC outside of the top 3...Originally Posted by Nowitness41Dirk
So you are saying finances should be a determining factor in a team playing for the National Championship? How about let them decide it on thefield how it is supposed to be. Do I need to give you a history lesson on TCU?Originally Posted by Nowitness41Dirk
Point 2... Most of the other BCS conferences (Big East excluded) have teams, even in the bottom of their conferences, that bring things to the table financially and historically...
Again, what has BYU done that TCU hasnt?Originally Posted by Nowitness41Dirk
Point 3... TCU is less legitimate than Utah or BYU because they've never done it. What is difficult about that? You can gripe and complain about how they deserve this and that, but they've never accomplished ANYTHING. Woohoo you won the Mountain West the first year you were there... What since? What gripe does TCU have about deserving an automatic BCS bid? They've never been left out when they actually deserved it, because they've never warranted one.
And, if you want to bring up attendance, then you should also mention that TCU has 8,000 students, that's it. Its not one of these huge stateuniversities that has 40,000-50,000 students that can fill 70% of their stadium. It has been show that TCU has just as good of percentage of student turn outsas any other school. Our living alumni could barely fill our stadium if every single person were to come back.Originally Posted by Nowitness41Dirk
Hell, TCU students don't even care about TCU football... I spent a year at TCU, so don't come at me like I don't know what I'm taking about... People go to their games to tailgate. That's it. The biggest game they've ever hosted (Texas Tech in 2006), parking lots were packed but the season was damn near half-full and walk-up tickets available after the first quarter when I got there, and their stadium ain't even big...
Sep. 5 at OK State L 10-24
Sep. 12 South Carolina 7:00pm
Sep. 19 at Arkansas 7:45pm
10 yrs - tons of Talent, one SEC Title (I think)HowLong is Mark Richt's leash?
Could Georgia Start the yr 0-3 ???
After you posted up the big games of the weekend I started to think this was a possibility but I just wasnt all that impressed with South Carolina last week. This isnt to say that I was impressed with Georgia against Okie State but I think the disparity between Georgia's defensive talent vs. South Carolina'soffensive talent is too great.
What does Baylor making a bowl have to do with them being a better team RIGHT NOW than any of the bottom 6 in the Mountain West?Originally Posted by Trelvis Tha Thrilla
What exactly has BYU done that TCU hasnt? Baylor is trash and will remain so otherwise until they actually make a bowl game.
So you are saying finances should be a determining factor in a team playing for the National Championship? How about let them decide it on the field how it is supposed to be. Do I need to give you a history lesson on TCU?
2 National Championships
14 Conference Championships
Some of the greatest to ever play the game in Sammy Baugh, L.T., Davey O'Brian, Bob Lilly...We have trophies named after our players
tha hell you talkin bout. Tennessee aint no bottom-feeder.Originally Posted by Nowitness41Dirk
What do they do for anybody financially? Not a damn thing compared to schools like Nebraska, Colorado, Texas A&M, Iowa, Arkansas, Auburn, [color= rgb(255, 102, 0)]Tennessee,[/color] Washington and UCLA...
10 yrs - tons of Talent, one SEC Title (I think)Originally Posted by GUNNA GET IT
Could Georgia Start the yr 0-3 ???
Sep. 5 at OK State L 10-24
Sep. 12 South Carolina 7:00pm
Sep. 19 at Arkansas 7:45pm
Bro, you know what I'm saying... Teams at the bottom of BCS Conferences RIGHT NOW... How isn't that clear?Originally Posted by EB14
tha hell you talkin bout. Tennessee aint no bottom-feeder.
UT got 1 bad year & now they are a bottom-feeder. bunch of nonsense
i assumed that the laughing emoticons would have conveyed my sarcasm.Originally Posted by Nowitness41Dirk
Bro, you know what I'm saying... Teams at the bottom of BCS Conferences RIGHT NOW... How isn't that clear?Originally Posted by EB14
tha hell you talkin bout. Tennessee aint no bottom-feeder.
UT got 1 bad year & now they are a bottom-feeder. bunch of nonsense
Stop it.Originally Posted by lowslows
Greg Reid was the best defensive back on the feild tonight though
Originally Posted by EB14
i assumed that the laughing emoticons would have conveyed my sarcasm.
but i definitely get what you're saying. & i agree with it
Having his knee scoped... It's possible...Originally Posted by Al3xis
gresham is done for the year?
i agree. those trash #$# teams at the bottom of the MWC would bring nothing to the table for the BCS.Originally Posted by Nowitness41Dirk
Originally Posted by EB14
i assumed that the laughing emoticons would have conveyed my sarcasm.
but i definitely get what you're saying. & i agree with itMy bad... Just using teams that are down right now to make a point, and since he threw around Wyoming beating UTk, I used them as an example... Tennessee is NOT Wyoming. Colorado is NOT Colorado State. Nebraska, Iowa, Auburn and Texas A&M aren't New Mexico, UNLV, SDSU and Air Force.
There's a clear line between teams currently at the bottom of every BCS conference (aside from the Big East, which I won't even argue) and the bottom of the Mountain West... I'm just tryin to say regardless of CSU beating Colorado or Wyoming beating UTk, it's a clear difference that my man clearly ain't getting or just flat out ignoring... But what can you do? *shrugs*