- 1,759
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2006
1. Bryant
2. Duncan
3. Garnett
4. O'Neal
5. James
6. Kidd
7. Nowitzki
8. Iverson
9. Wade
10. Pierce
2. Duncan
3. Garnett
4. O'Neal
5. James
6. Kidd
7. Nowitzki
8. Iverson
9. Wade
10. Pierce
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
basicallyOriginally Posted by I NaSmatic I
No order:
Duncan
Shaq
Kobe
Garnett
Kidd
Dirk
LeBron
Iverson
Nash
Wade
Originally Posted by CP1708
Originally Posted by Mamba MVP
1a. Kobe (has been dominant the entire decade: 4 rings) Put in work in the playoffs
1b. Duncan (same as Kobe: 3 rings) Put in work in the playoffs
3. Shaq (unstoppable from 2000-2003; then tailed off except for '06 in Miami, had a lull, but seems to have a little left in the tank: 4 rings) Put in work in the playoffs
4. KG (can't stand the guy, but he carried Minny for so long and finally got the chip with Boston1 ring) Put in work in the playoffs
5. AI (best little man scorer in history, MVP, taking bunch of scrubs to the Finals) Put in work in the playoffs
6. Kidd (walking triple double, one of the best PGs of all time) Put in work in the playoffs
7. Dirk (MVP, took Mavs to Finals, consistent the entire decade) Put in work in the playoffs
8. Nash Made it to the playoffs
9. Bron (MVP, gonna definitely be at the top of the list for the next decade) put in work in the playoffs
10. Wade (Finals MVP and performance for the ages even if it was with the help of the striped shirts: 1 ring) put in work in the playoffs
Irony at it's finest right there.
All these folk puttin the same bum on their list for a two year run. Dude ain't done a damn thing more then CWebb did in his half a decade.
But since I'm the one to post this, people will just make excuses and say I'm hating.But read all them names again. And think about it real hard.
Originally Posted by CP1708
Billups went to 7 straight conference finals, and won a title, and went to the finals back to back years, and has a finals MVP.
Nash has two trophies.
People can pick Nash all they want. Kidd and Billups were the better players, and maybe even Tony Parker. So Nash is top 3-4 at his own position, but top 10 the whole NBA? Naw.
Your argument for Billups is based on team achievements, except for Finals MVP, which is an overrated award in my opinion.Originally Posted by CP1708
Billups went to 7 straight conference finals, and won a title, and went to the finals back to back years, and has a finals MVP.
Nash has two trophies.
I don't know about the other NTers that posted, but my list was picked based on individual accomplishment and skill, not how well theplayers' teams did.Originally Posted by CP1708
Well then I guess rings shouldn't matter for Kobe or Duncan or Shaq, cuz those are team things.
People baffle me.
10 guys, 9 of them are huge postseason players, been to the finals, multiple finals, Finals MVP's, etc etc, and then one other guy. Then to defend that guy, they say postseason don't matter.I give up.
Originally Posted by Chester McFloppy
Originally Posted by dreClark
^ You forgot SashaOriginally Posted by yungmatt
Originally Posted by I NaSmatic I
No order:
Duncan
Shaq
Kobe
Garnett
Kidd
Dirk
LeBron
Iverson
Nash
Wade
My exact list
Originally Posted by I NaSmatic I
CWebb had a strong 4 year run in Sacramento and a good year in Philly, but otherwise.
Originally Posted by CP1708
Billups went to 7 straight conference finals, and won a title, and went to the finals back to back years, and has a finals MVP.
Nash has two trophies.
People can pick Nash all they want. Kidd and Billups were the better players, and maybe even Tony Parker. So Nash is top 3-4 at his own position, but top 10 the whole NBA? Naw.
am i missing something here?Originally Posted by dland24
Originally Posted by I NaSmatic I
CWebb had a strong 4 year run in Sacramento and a good year in Philly, but otherwise.
Yet most people have Steve Nash on their list. Wouldnt ^ be the same reason Nash should be excluded from lists?