Wrestling Thread Oct 25-21 | 10/29 Smackdown - Undertaker Funeral | New #1 Contender

[mister916]

Originally Posted by GotHolesInMySocks

916, toine

yall still coppin svr11??


i think imma pick it up, the universe mode is mad fun from what ive heard

plus a more updated roster, better caw options, u can set their attributes how u want them

imma pick it up sat.

i seen a few created wrestlers already, some dude did sid vicious, lethal and jake the snake........all 3 were on point

I don't know yet. I think I'll wait it out. Let us know how it is.

 

[hombrelobo]

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

Originally Posted by hombrelobo

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

In regards to WWE's lawsuit against the state of Connecticut.....

WWE sent out a release saying that Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz notified all Registrars of Voters and town clerks in Connecticut via e-mail to allow people wearing WWE merchandise to vote.

The WWE is using this as a victory over Richard Blumenthal as well.  

"Attorney General Richard Blumenthal should have immediately stepped in to enforce the law.  As a result of the Attorney General's inaction, I brought suit to enfroce these basic, fundamental constitutional rights.  Within hours of filing the lawsuit, Blumenthal recused himself,and Bysiewicz reversed her position." wrote Vince McMahon.

Vince has completely lost it.  You might run wrestling, but you'll never run this country.

It was completely out of line for the State to ban any voter from wearing WWE clothing to the polls. I'm not supporting the McMahon's involvement in politics but he did have a point. You can't tell people what and what not to wear at the polls. There's no arguing that.

Um, actually you can.  Per Connecticut state law:
"State election law prevents political advertising within 75 feet of the polls. Any clothing, paraphernalia or merchandise that actually bears the name, likeness or campaign logo of any candidate will still be restricted."

While WWE and Linda McMahon are two different entities, they have become dangerously close to directly aligning with one another, specifically around the Stand Up for WWE campaign which is why Linda's people came out denying any involvement.  However, since the judge ruled that Linda and WWE are separate, WWE gear will be allowed at polling stations.


Dude, if that was the case the Attorney General wouldn't have reversed his position. Technically then all you could do is to not allow POLITICAL paraphernalia to the polls. But that is the exception of telling people what people can or cannot wear.

 

[hombrelobo]

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

Originally Posted by hombrelobo

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

In regards to WWE's lawsuit against the state of Connecticut.....

WWE sent out a release saying that Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz notified all Registrars of Voters and town clerks in Connecticut via e-mail to allow people wearing WWE merchandise to vote.

The WWE is using this as a victory over Richard Blumenthal as well.  

"Attorney General Richard Blumenthal should have immediately stepped in to enforce the law.  As a result of the Attorney General's inaction, I brought suit to enfroce these basic, fundamental constitutional rights.  Within hours of filing the lawsuit, Blumenthal recused himself,and Bysiewicz reversed her position." wrote Vince McMahon.

Vince has completely lost it.  You might run wrestling, but you'll never run this country.

It was completely out of line for the State to ban any voter from wearing WWE clothing to the polls. I'm not supporting the McMahon's involvement in politics but he did have a point. You can't tell people what and what not to wear at the polls. There's no arguing that.

Um, actually you can.  Per Connecticut state law:
"State election law prevents political advertising within 75 feet of the polls. Any clothing, paraphernalia or merchandise that actually bears the name, likeness or campaign logo of any candidate will still be restricted."

While WWE and Linda McMahon are two different entities, they have become dangerously close to directly aligning with one another, specifically around the Stand Up for WWE campaign which is why Linda's people came out denying any involvement.  However, since the judge ruled that Linda and WWE are separate, WWE gear will be allowed at polling stations.


Dude, if that was the case the Attorney General wouldn't have reversed his position. Technically then all you could do is to not allow POLITICAL paraphernalia to the polls. But that is the exception of telling people what people can or cannot wear.

 

[T0INE]

Originally Posted by GotHolesInMySocks

916, toine

yall still coppin svr11??


i think imma pick it up, the universe mode is mad fun from what ive heard

plus a more updated roster, better caw options, u can set their attributes how u want them

imma pick it up sat.

i seen a few created wrestlers already, some dude did sid vicious, lethal and jake the snake........all 3 were on point

I'll probably get in a couple of weeks.

916 needs to stop messing around and cop it so that I can steal some of his CAWs.

  

 

[T0INE]

Originally Posted by GotHolesInMySocks

916, toine

yall still coppin svr11??


i think imma pick it up, the universe mode is mad fun from what ive heard

plus a more updated roster, better caw options, u can set their attributes how u want them

imma pick it up sat.

i seen a few created wrestlers already, some dude did sid vicious, lethal and jake the snake........all 3 were on point

I'll probably get in a couple of weeks.

916 needs to stop messing around and cop it so that I can steal some of his CAWs.

  

 

[4wrestling]

Originally Posted by hombrelobo

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

Originally Posted by hombrelobo

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

In regards to WWE's lawsuit against the state of Connecticut.....

WWE sent out a release saying that Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz notified all Registrars of Voters and town clerks in Connecticut via e-mail to allow people wearing WWE merchandise to vote.

The WWE is using this as a victory over Richard Blumenthal as well.  

"Attorney General Richard Blumenthal should have immediately stepped in to enforce the law.  As a result of the Attorney General's inaction, I brought suit to enfroce these basic, fundamental constitutional rights.  Within hours of filing the lawsuit, Blumenthal recused himself,and Bysiewicz reversed her position." wrote Vince McMahon.

Vince has completely lost it.  You might run wrestling, but you'll never run this country.

It was completely out of line for the State to ban any voter from wearing WWE clothing to the polls. I'm not supporting the McMahon's involvement in politics but he did have a point. You can't tell people what and what not to wear at the polls. There's no arguing that.

Um, actually you can.  Per Connecticut state law:
"State election law prevents political advertising within 75 feet of the polls. Any clothing, paraphernalia or merchandise that actually bears the name, likeness or campaign logo of any candidate will still be restricted."

While WWE and Linda McMahon are two different entities, they have become dangerously close to directly aligning with one another, specifically around the Stand Up for WWE campaign which is why Linda's people came out denying any involvement.  However, since the judge ruled that Linda and WWE are separate, WWE gear will be allowed at polling stations.

Dude, if that was the case the Attorney General wouldn't have reversed his position. Technically then all you could do is to not allow POLITICAL paraphernalia to the polls. But that is the exception of telling people what people can or cannot wear.





Huh?

 

[4wrestling]

Originally Posted by hombrelobo

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

Originally Posted by hombrelobo

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

In regards to WWE's lawsuit against the state of Connecticut.....

WWE sent out a release saying that Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz notified all Registrars of Voters and town clerks in Connecticut via e-mail to allow people wearing WWE merchandise to vote.

The WWE is using this as a victory over Richard Blumenthal as well.  

"Attorney General Richard Blumenthal should have immediately stepped in to enforce the law.  As a result of the Attorney General's inaction, I brought suit to enfroce these basic, fundamental constitutional rights.  Within hours of filing the lawsuit, Blumenthal recused himself,and Bysiewicz reversed her position." wrote Vince McMahon.

Vince has completely lost it.  You might run wrestling, but you'll never run this country.

It was completely out of line for the State to ban any voter from wearing WWE clothing to the polls. I'm not supporting the McMahon's involvement in politics but he did have a point. You can't tell people what and what not to wear at the polls. There's no arguing that.

Um, actually you can.  Per Connecticut state law:
"State election law prevents political advertising within 75 feet of the polls. Any clothing, paraphernalia or merchandise that actually bears the name, likeness or campaign logo of any candidate will still be restricted."

While WWE and Linda McMahon are two different entities, they have become dangerously close to directly aligning with one another, specifically around the Stand Up for WWE campaign which is why Linda's people came out denying any involvement.  However, since the judge ruled that Linda and WWE are separate, WWE gear will be allowed at polling stations.

Dude, if that was the case the Attorney General wouldn't have reversed his position. Technically then all you could do is to not allow POLITICAL paraphernalia to the polls. But that is the exception of telling people what people can or cannot wear.





Huh?

 

[je ne sais quoi]

4w, just do the job and let him go over already or else we won't hear the end of this.

 

[je ne sais quoi]

4w, just do the job and let him go over already or else we won't hear the end of this.

 

[hombrelobo]

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

Originally Posted by hombrelobo

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

Originally Posted by hombrelobo

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

In regards to WWE's lawsuit against the state of Connecticut.....

Huh?

I'm too hungover for this. I had a long night of rooting the Giants on in the World Series last night. 

 

[hombrelobo]

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

Originally Posted by hombrelobo

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

Originally Posted by hombrelobo

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

In regards to WWE's lawsuit against the state of Connecticut.....

Huh?

I'm too hungover for this. I had a long night of rooting the Giants on in the World Series last night. 

 

[Bend_The_Knee]

Originally Posted by Je Ne Sais Quoi

4w, just do the job and let him go over already or else we won't hear the end of this.

heel 4w is still fairly new, lets see how this feud unfolds

 

[Bend_The_Knee]

Originally Posted by Je Ne Sais Quoi

4w, just do the job and let him go over already or else we won't hear the end of this.

heel 4w is still fairly new, lets see how this feud unfolds

 

[D Fly]

Cena ain't the only one that wants to face The Rock..now it's Miz:



Game Reviews - E3 2011



Skip to about 3:16

 

[D Fly]

Cena ain't the only one that wants to face The Rock..now it's Miz:



Game Reviews - E3 2011



Skip to about 3:16

 

[4wrestling]

[h1]Free WWE Merchandise at CT Polls
[/h1]

STAMFORD, Conn., Oct 28, 2010 (BUSINESS WIRE) --To celebrate the victory of restoring voters' right to wear WWE(R) clothing at the polls, World Wrestling Entertainment(R) will be giving away WWE merchandise near select Connecticut poll locations on Election Day, this Tuesday, November 2nd.

"I can't think of a better way for WWE fans to celebrate their constitutional rights and freedom of expression while voting than to proudly wear the WWE merchandise that Connecticut Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz attempted to prohibit from the polls," said Vince McMahon, Chairman and CEO, World Wrestling Entertainment.

Out of respect for voters from all political parties, WWE will not be handing out merchandise within 75 feet of polling locations, and merchandise will be available on a first come, first served basis.


This is so typical Vince McMahon.  Linda's lost the race, so now it's just a publicity stunt to draw attention to WWE.  Well, I hope the $50 million they blew on Linda was worth it.  To me, this makes both WWE and Linda look pathetic as opposed to drawing good press.  And I think any chance of Linda ever getting into office is the future is completely down the drain as Vince has turned this into a complete circus.

 

[4wrestling]

[h1]Free WWE Merchandise at CT Polls
[/h1]

STAMFORD, Conn., Oct 28, 2010 (BUSINESS WIRE) --To celebrate the victory of restoring voters' right to wear WWE(R) clothing at the polls, World Wrestling Entertainment(R) will be giving away WWE merchandise near select Connecticut poll locations on Election Day, this Tuesday, November 2nd.

"I can't think of a better way for WWE fans to celebrate their constitutional rights and freedom of expression while voting than to proudly wear the WWE merchandise that Connecticut Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz attempted to prohibit from the polls," said Vince McMahon, Chairman and CEO, World Wrestling Entertainment.

Out of respect for voters from all political parties, WWE will not be handing out merchandise within 75 feet of polling locations, and merchandise will be available on a first come, first served basis.


This is so typical Vince McMahon.  Linda's lost the race, so now it's just a publicity stunt to draw attention to WWE.  Well, I hope the $50 million they blew on Linda was worth it.  To me, this makes both WWE and Linda look pathetic as opposed to drawing good press.  And I think any chance of Linda ever getting into office is the future is completely down the drain as Vince has turned this into a complete circus.

 

[4wrestling]

Originally Posted by hombrelobo

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

Originally Posted by hombrelobo

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

Originally Posted by hombrelobo

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

In regards to WWE's lawsuit against the state of Connecticut.....

Huh?

I'm too hungover for this. I had a long night of rooting the Giants on in the World Series last night. 

I didn't know the legal drinking age got changed to 15.

 

[4wrestling]

Originally Posted by hombrelobo

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

Originally Posted by hombrelobo

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

Originally Posted by hombrelobo

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

In regards to WWE's lawsuit against the state of Connecticut.....

Huh?

I'm too hungover for this. I had a long night of rooting the Giants on in the World Series last night. 

I didn't know the legal drinking age got changed to 15.

 

[4wrestling]

*Jay Lethal vs. Robbie E in a non-title match

*Motor City Machine Guns vs. Generation Me vs. Shannon Moore & Jesse Neal for the TNA tag titles

*Angelina Love & Velvet Sky & Mickie James vs. Tara & Sarita & Madison Rayne

*Rob Van Dam & Raven vs. Douglas Williams & A.J. Styles

*____________ vs. Jeff Jarrett in a chain match

Tonight's show is built around Mr. Anderson who has a concussion and whether or not he'll be able to compete in tonight's main event.

 

[4wrestling]

*Jay Lethal vs. Robbie E in a non-title match

*Motor City Machine Guns vs. Generation Me vs. Shannon Moore & Jesse Neal for the TNA tag titles

*Angelina Love & Velvet Sky & Mickie James vs. Tara & Sarita & Madison Rayne

*Rob Van Dam & Raven vs. Douglas Williams & A.J. Styles

*____________ vs. Jeff Jarrett in a chain match

Tonight's show is built around Mr. Anderson who has a concussion and whether or not he'll be able to compete in tonight's main event.

 

[ggarvinxx3]

@ taz takin a shot at the undertaker....



i might be the only one watching this program

 

[ggarvinxx3]

@ taz takin a shot at the undertaker....



i might be the only one watching this program

 

[hombrelobo]

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

Originally Posted by hombrelobo

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

Originally Posted by hombrelobo

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

Originally Posted by hombrelobo

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

I didn't know the legal drinking age got changed to 15.

You so silly 4W.. I can't even take that seriously.

 

[hombrelobo]

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

Originally Posted by hombrelobo

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

Originally Posted by hombrelobo

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

Originally Posted by hombrelobo

Originally Posted by 4wrestling

I didn't know the legal drinking age got changed to 15.

You so silly 4W.. I can't even take that seriously.