Wrestling Thread April-September 2018 RIP

I miss everyone under 1 roof.....
I like the separate brands, WWE just doesn't do a good job of maintaining proper balance/continuity.

But most of all, just too many titles man.

It would be nice if Titles didn't just stick to ONE brand, so the cross-brand PPV's can be more of a bragging rights thing; RAW vs. SD. But having double belts just makes belts seem less important
 
I like the separate brands, WWE just doesn't do a good job of maintaining proper balance/continuity.

But most of all, just too many titles man.

It would be nice if Titles didn't just stick to ONE brand, so the cross-brand PPV's can be more of a bragging rights thing; RAW vs. SD. But having double belts just makes belts seem less important

I do agree with you about the belts. Can't have 2 "world titles".
 
7V1001.jpg

@PLVN



Jessamyn Duke's tattoo location. :evil:
 
DCAllAfrican DCAllAfrican

What did Meltzer mean when he said that Sanada doesn't know how good he is?

When did he say that?

But I would assume he means...............he lacks work ethic? But how would Meltzer know that? I am not sure what he meant.

Your thoughts on it?

This SANADA discussion been ran too many times before. Ultra talented and good look but when it comes to putting everything together and having a great match...heh
 
I said it before but I feel like breaking a record.

If I had it my way

But yea, there would only be one "set" of titles. The champion simply takes the belt back to his home show.

WWE World's Heavyweight Title
WWE Intercontinental Title
WWE US Heavyweight Title ( ? )
WWE Women's Title
WWE World's Cruiserweight Title
WWE World's Tag-Team Title

I even question if we need BOTH the US and IC titles. Both serve as a secondary title to World Titles, but we only have One World Title, so why do we need TWO secondary titles? Wouldn't that technically make one of those belts (US or IC) a 3rd title and no longer a second title?
 
Back
Top Bottom