- Apr 18, 2014
- 8,756
- 5,707
Interesting video. Repped
what do you suspect but have no proof of....
bravelude
Banned
- Dec 29, 2013
- 7,573
- 1,115
but.u cant.supplement breast feeding with two dudes dough. similac just not da same. comfort levels at different stages in life not da same either. difft roles.
cant just say, u want a kid outta the blue and borrow gametes to satisfy ya own wants. just saying dough.
not even bout religions
cant just say, u want a kid outta the blue and borrow gametes to satisfy ya own wants. just saying dough.
not even bout religions
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 46,971
- 31,591
It is absolutely about religion.
Are you a child psychologist? Have you studied/researched child development?
Do you believe in a religion?
Are you a child psychologist? Have you studied/researched child development?
Do you believe in a religion?
- Mar 6, 2007
- 8,323
- 730
- May 20, 2006
- 5,984
- 9,871
Wouldn't it be easier to increase the amount of infertility in heterosexual people? Because, you know, there are straight people who can't have children too
[/quote]BOOM. Logic.Gay people CAN STILL MAKE BABIES. I have a lesbian friend who has a kid. "How? She's lesbian." She decided she wanted to have a child, so she had sex with a man. Simple. Procreation is still procreation, gay or straight. If a gay man inseminates a gay woman, she can have a child.
Put infidelity into the equation: no baby.[/quote]
I would suspect if a gay man were able to perform to the point of impregnating a woman, he's not really gay.
Last edited:
Perhaps you don't understand how cancer works.
- Feb 28, 2009
- 7,347
- 750
Or maybe a lot of the Hispanic population doesn't want to learn English but businesses still want them to buy their goods so they cater to them in their native tongue?
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 46,971
- 31,591
[quote name="FrankMatthews"][quote name="DarthSka"][quote name="Gordonson"][quote name="TVobach"]Alright, now, before I say this, know that I have nothing against people being gay/homosexual other than me disagreeing with it and believing it is a sin. Now, I sin too, so I am no better than them.
But, I suspect that the Devil is attempting to get people to sin by being gay/homosexual which will end up leading to a huge decrease in population and then....
What I am saying is, how can people be made if men and women aren't having sex.
[/quote]Wouldn't it be easier to increase the amount of infertility in heterosexual people? Because, you know, there are straight people who can't have children too[/quote]BOOM. Logic.
Gay people CAN STILL MAKE BABIES. I have a lesbian friend who has a kid. "How? She's lesbian." She decided she wanted to have a child, so she had sex with a man. Simple. Procreation is still procreation, gay or straight. If a gay man inseminates a gay woman, she can have a child.
Put infidelity into the equation: no baby.[/quote]
I would suspect if a gay man were able to perform to the point of impregnating a woman, he's not really gay.[/quote]Have they just quit teaching biology in school altogether?
Attraction is not entirely necessary to get hard, man.
C'mon.
But, I suspect that the Devil is attempting to get people to sin by being gay/homosexual which will end up leading to a huge decrease in population and then....
What I am saying is, how can people be made if men and women aren't having sex.
[/quote]Wouldn't it be easier to increase the amount of infertility in heterosexual people? Because, you know, there are straight people who can't have children too
[/quote]BOOM. Logic.Gay people CAN STILL MAKE BABIES. I have a lesbian friend who has a kid. "How? She's lesbian." She decided she wanted to have a child, so she had sex with a man. Simple. Procreation is still procreation, gay or straight. If a gay man inseminates a gay woman, she can have a child.
Put infidelity into the equation: no baby.[/quote]
I would suspect if a gay man were able to perform to the point of impregnating a woman, he's not really gay.[/quote]Have they just quit teaching biology in school altogether?
Attraction is not entirely necessary to get hard, man.
C'mon.
- Jan 5, 2004
- 16,379
- 5,098
BOOM. Logic.Wouldn't it be easier to increase the amount of infertility in heterosexual people? Because, you know, there are straight people who can't have children too
Gay people CAN STILL MAKE BABIES. I have a lesbian friend who has a kid. "How? She's lesbian." She decided she wanted to have a child, so she had sex with a man. Simple. Procreation is still procreation, gay or straight. If a gay man inseminates a gay woman, she can have a child.
Put infidelity into the equation: no baby.[/quote]
I would suspect if a gay man were able to perform to the point of impregnating a woman, he's not really gay.[/quote]
Being gay or straight does not always have to be about sex... It's more about the feelings you have for the same sex, on an emotional level... Just because you find a human body attractive, regardless of sex, your orientation is effected...
I have a gay friend... I turned him onto vagina
... He's always found the female body attractive, and had thoughts of sex with a female.... But was very much gay, and could never imagine being in a relationship or developing feelings for a female... But he still enjoyed having sex with them... I think every gay person has primal feelings for "traditional" sex, if for no other reason than to repopulate... But that's just being an animal, which is all humans are...
- Jan 5, 2004
- 16,379
- 5,098
Things I believe... Or, stoned ramblings of man on toilet...
There are "cures", or more likely treatments for most diseases, and are saved people of exceptional importance to whatever it is they're important for... The reason these "cures" are not released on a world wide scale isn't because of money... But because of population control... Population has already multipled many times over over the course of the last couple centuries... Imagine of no one died of diseases anymore... It's a tactic I agree with personally...
There is no such thing as the human conscience...
Deju vu... There's something about it... I don't know... But I think it holds the key to something... It's all in our brains... Which is drastically under-understood... There's so much our minds are capable of, that we've yet to even fathom...
The Air max zero looks like a $49.99 Olympia Sports clearance table looking shoe...
Time travel exists, or will exist... Traveling forward on time is very easily accomplished, in theory anyways... Backwards, if possible, would only be possible from the moment that it was discovered and accomplished...
Aliens... They exist...they know we do... They largely don't give a damn... And the ones that do, are "oddballs"... Few different types from few places...
Life on this universe is very abundant.. "intelligent" life, not so much...
4W has fleas and a rash...
Marijuana, it does a body good...
A lot of mythical creatures existing, in one form or another... "Bigfoot", giant sea creatures, El chupacabra, yeti (Word to konnan), and others... The world is a big place, with many creatures that are only unique/adapted to one area... It doesn't take a high population to keep a species alive...
Bermuda triangle and other areas of "oddness" exist...
There are "cures", or more likely treatments for most diseases, and are saved people of exceptional importance to whatever it is they're important for... The reason these "cures" are not released on a world wide scale isn't because of money... But because of population control... Population has already multipled many times over over the course of the last couple centuries... Imagine of no one died of diseases anymore... It's a tactic I agree with personally...
There is no such thing as the human conscience...
Deju vu... There's something about it... I don't know... But I think it holds the key to something... It's all in our brains... Which is drastically under-understood... There's so much our minds are capable of, that we've yet to even fathom...
The Air max zero looks like a $49.99 Olympia Sports clearance table looking shoe...
Time travel exists, or will exist... Traveling forward on time is very easily accomplished, in theory anyways... Backwards, if possible, would only be possible from the moment that it was discovered and accomplished...
Aliens... They exist...they know we do... They largely don't give a damn... And the ones that do, are "oddballs"... Few different types from few places...
Life on this universe is very abundant.. "intelligent" life, not so much...
4W has fleas and a rash...
Marijuana, it does a body good...
A lot of mythical creatures existing, in one form or another... "Bigfoot", giant sea creatures, El chupacabra, yeti (Word to konnan), and others... The world is a big place, with many creatures that are only unique/adapted to one area... It doesn't take a high population to keep a species alive...
Bermuda triangle and other areas of "oddness" exist...
Last edited:
- Oct 1, 2013
- 265
- 231
Naw, what'd it say?
- Oct 1, 2013
- 265
- 231
Nah, what'd it say?
- Oct 1, 2013
- 265
- 231
They're lyrics to a dead prez song..."propaganda"
- Nov 10, 2013
- 3,783
- 4,214
Smh
- Dec 28, 2004
- 18,903
- 1,184
There are dumb people on NT...but we have proof of that... (prays there are no errors in the previous sentence lol)
I believe what we see in the futuristic movies and the inventions in them, like Total Recall, Terminator, 5th element will be created cause someone showcased the "object" and someone went on to create it.
We believed there will be self-driving cars, Tesla is now making them.
I believe what we see in the futuristic movies and the inventions in them, like Total Recall, Terminator, 5th element will be created cause someone showcased the "object" and someone went on to create it.
We believed there will be self-driving cars, Tesla is now making them.
- Oct 8, 2002
- 42,408
- 44,321
Humans are DEvovling instead of evolving.
jpzx
Supporter
- Feb 7, 2008
- 58,679
- 28,002
Last edited:
- Oct 10, 2013
- 43,425
- 42,998
Physically yes. We breed illness into our population, fats **** fats, ect. Think about back in ancient Greece where they outcasted infants with and deformities and such. Pretty cruel but you get the picture
Last edited:
- Oct 8, 2002
- 42,408
- 44,321
All around. We think we're doing with all these "tech advances", all we're doing is making ourselves lazier and dumber. That turns into violence, which is eventually gonna turn into straight up savagery.
You see it happening already.
- Oct 10, 2013
- 43,425
- 42,998
The invention of the gun killed humanity. It gave everyone equal power. Back in the old times if you went to war to better of meant it because dudes were fighting face to face. Those dudes had to brainwashed into thinking death doesn't matter anymore. If you wanted to fight you better mean it
norwaydre
Banned
- Oct 18, 2012
- 2,468
- 1,076
Ok
- Apr 15, 2013
- 7,708
- 4,947
THANK YOU.
I know
This actually wouldn't matter, because if he sees your red as blue, then he would always see that. Therefore a red light for you would always be blue for him, even though he calls it red. It wouldn't change anything except how we perceive it ourselves. This is because we associate colors with names and whatever color we see and name it at first, that is how we would always see it and name it.
Just like how some birds can see more colors, which are invisible to us
someone gets it
but birds can see colors we cant?
its all good.
This is interesting and I suppose it's possible so I take back my statement
However, you mentioned we associate color with names, but each color has a specific wavelength, so wouldn't it be more accurate to say we are naming the wavelength?
Now our eyes receive the wavelengths the same (or most of us) but I suppose since our brains process the wavelengths our eyes pick up, it's possible people's brains might perceive the wavelengths differently.I'm not a scientist, but I still doubt this is the case, but until we can recreate or project is exactly what our brains perceive, my red is your red and your blue is my blue.
Anyway i guess it can't or hasn't been proven so amarano's post applies to this thread. My bad
FWIW your driving joke is still funny.
Last edited:
- Apr 15, 2004
- 44,369
- 74,050
There are animals that can see colors we cant and hear things we cant because of extra organs
If we had no eyes we would be unaware of the existence of color.
I suspect we are missing entire aspects of things because we don't have the organ/sense ti detect it.
If we had no eyes we would be unaware of the existence of color.
I suspect we are missing entire aspects of things because we don't have the organ/sense ti detect it.
- Apr 15, 2013
- 7,708
- 4,947
thats pretty mind blowing if you think about it...There are animals that can see colors we cant and hear things we cant because of extra organs
If we had no eyes we would be unaware of the existence of color.
I suspect we are missing entire aspects of things because we don't have the organ/sense ti detect it.
- Oct 8, 2002
- 42,408
- 44,321
There are animals that can see colors we cant and hear things we cant because of extra organs
If we had no eyes we would be unaware of the existence of color.
I suspect we are missing entire aspects of things because we don't have the organ/sense ti detect it.
thats pretty mind blowing if you think about it...
Right.
How do we know anything actually looks like the what we see?
What if the sky is actually pink?
Last edited:
