Viacom Ends Decades Long Relationship With Nick Cannon Because “White People Are Evil”

Status
Not open for further replies.
uhm the bargain bin "satanic jews run the world" conspiracy theory bull ****?



I remember Tanehasi Coates article talking about one of the privileges of being black is that you don't just get to believe dumb ****
because socitey will punish you for it in a way that it doesn't punish white people.


Just because white people get to believe in dumb ideologies that DOES NOT MEAN WE SHOULD INVENT OUR OWN DUMB IDEOLOGY



Leave that **** for the MAGA hats.


When you come up with CONCEPTS that are better than Farrakhan’s then talk. Ya’ll be so critical but aren’t even thinking of so called “better” methods. At least Farrakhan is a critical thinker. Ain’t nothing worse than a critic, who doesn’t even have a better solution:lol :rollin :rollin

Just be talking jibberish
 
Farrakhan has devoted his 89 years on this earth crusading for Black people. That man BEEN standing in the paint, but some if y’all respect celebrities, athletes and entertainers more than a dude like him.

That man been a leadoff hitter 8x over!!! I’m gone forever rock with him
 
what has he been defending the past 2 months ?

what he (and The Nation) is doing right now is not being broadcasted. It’s hard to call someone a man of hatred when so much love is being shown.

The same Jews that made Nick apologize also made sure that Farrakhan’s speech on July 4th wasn’t broadcasted, a speech that Nick attended.

Now why wouldn’t they want his speech heard? A speech where he said he doesn’t hate the Jews, which he’s said multiple times recently and in the past few years. Why would they go out of their way to do that?

“Think! It’s not illegal yet.” – Eddie Griffin
 
My beef with the minister is one of spiritual concern, as is my disagreement of all religions that oppress women. I also found it odd that the minister took the Nation in the dianetics route, instead of the route of the ATR's, African Traditional Religions. The church of scientology is a religion created by a white man. Moving in that direction, was a bad move in my opinion, especially considering how that religion once excluded Black people.

My other beef with the Abrahamic beliefs, is the lack of honoring the ancestors.

That, is a huge problem for me.

Outside of that, the Minister should be able to utilize free speech as he sees fit, just like any american of privilege.

Privilege.
 
Does Nick own the IP for WildnOut?
He owns the show and does all the production out of pocket. He had a distribution deal through Viacom.

This just seems like he been wanting them to fire him.

Wild n out should've been a YouTube show or on his own platform for a while. Doesn't make sense at this time and no one watches TV anymore.
 
uhm the bargain bin "satanic jews run the world" conspiracy theory bull ****?



I remember Tanehasi Coates article talking about one of the privileges of being black is that you don't just get to believe dumb ****
because socitey will punish you for it in a way that it doesn't punish white people.


Just because white people get to believe in dumb ideologies that DOES NOT MEAN WE SHOULD INVENT OUR OWN DUMB IDEOLOGY



Leave that **** for the MAGA hats.
I agree w/ u, but ppl seem to need to believe in something to cope w/ things like death or related to it. Rituals will be here for as long as humans are. It’s about control, even if said control is mumbo jumbo.
 
satanic jews... you mean like others believing in the Illuminati? Same concept, different name?

You mean like the deep state, CIA missions to control other governments, all false?

White people do not try and further white supremacy through war, genocide, corruption?

Let's keep it a buck, there is nothing new under the sun, and all things are possible. Being Black and still being alive, was deemed impossible to the whites that enslaved us.

But we are still here. We have a right to consider any so called conspiracy, because we were also told that White Supremacy was nothing but a falsehood as well.

there plenty of people you can listen to or follow who are fighting against white supremacy,

all of that can be done without kooky "sataaaAAAnic JeeeEEEws are RuuuuUUnning the WoooOOOOOrld" none sense. :lol:
 
there plenty of people you can listen to or follow who are fighting against white supremacy,

all of that can be done without kooky "sataaaAAAnic JeeeEEEws are RuuuuUUnning the WoooOOOOOrld" none sense. :lol:
Do me a favor, find that quote for me. There are plenty clips of the Minister doing his thing on Youtube, so if he said what you've posted? Show it. Give us a link to the article if you wish.

I've posted what I disagree with him upon, and I can debate it through the usage of facts, both historical and spiritual. So my issue with him isn't about his right to say what he says, especially in regard to the plight of Black people, and then who the enemy of Black people actually is.
 

They drawing the line on black celebs.
Pretty soon, it is going to be time to close ranks. The time should have BEEN happened. However, we need to get these media outlets of our own on and poppin', and then supported by the entire Black/African diaspora.

I am sure the African/Ethiopian Jews will have a say about what is really going on in Israel as well.
 
All African American celebrities can easily be replaced by compliant black Europeans and African actors.


 
When you come up with CONCEPTS that are better than Farrakhan’s then talk. Ya’ll be so critical but aren’t even thinking of so called “better” methods. At least Farrakhan is a critical thinker. Ain’t nothing worse than a critic, who doesn’t even have a better solution:lol: :rofl: :rofl:

Just be talking jibberish
What evidence has he provided to prove some of his theories?

Those who know the pre-colonial history of Africa and can place it the context of the rise and fall of human civilizations don't need to believe that Black people are aliens.
 
Last edited:
Yeah I dont trust that ***** Farrakhan at all.

I feel sad he is the person our community goes to at all at times for leadership.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wr
The government and financial systems need to come up with a way to reverse the long term effects that redlining had on POC
 
i dont think thats true at all
You don't think it's true that our community goes to him for leadership at times? Or sort of puts him in a light where he is someone that ought to be listened to?

Let me be more clear then, I find it sad anybody from our community (outside of the ppl that subscribe to the same religion he does) goes to him at all for anything.
Master Zik Master Zik you been here too long to post a 'Fools Wildin' comment like that. :smh: :smh: :smh:
Imma need an explanation.

I dont rock with dude.

I don't care for when he's brought in to make peace, when ppl flock to hear a speech of his, etc.

If you saying that doesn't happen, you lost me.
Check it out, especially with what she says about leaders. 6:00 mark.




If y'all dispute is with the word leader then I can easily change that to get my point across.


Also I think some of yall may have read that sentence wrong and think I said our ppl go to him "at all times" when what I said was "at all at times" meaning I find it sad that ppl go to him at all and that at certain times our ppl do pay that ***** any mind.

But if y'all read it as I intended it please tell me exactly whats wrong with it.
 
Last edited:
You don't think it's true that our community goes to him for leadership at times? Or sort of puts him in a light where he is someone that ought to be listened to?

Let me be more clear then, I find it sad anybody from our community (outside of the ppl that subscribe to the same religion he does) goes to him at all for anything.

Imma need an explanation.

I dont rock with dude.

I don't care for when he's brought in to make peace, when ppl flock to hear a speech of his, etc.

If you saying that doesn't happen, you lost me.

Should've told me to skip to the 6 min mark.

If y'all dispute is with the word leader then I can easily change that to get my point across.
Thought I did!

I personally do not think that people look to him to be a leader, but I do think that they seek inspiration from him. I mean, he does not speak to the turn the other cheek mantra, that the other abrahamic faiths suggest, and his agenda is indeed Black. That said, as stated in the clip, I see no need for a single leader either.
 
We ain't a monolith. Every man has to leader. It's what we were born to do. Many in the nation and the community at large believe leading your family is the greatest thing you can do. I agree with that whole-heartedly.

The inherent problem for many of us is what do we do when we disgree with another black man's core ideology or methodology like Farrakhan? Willie Lynch has done a number. We can't cancel other black men because they argue, disagree with the majority, say **** they feel off the cuff, etc. As stated earlier we have to get on code at some ******* point. Why can't we take little bits and pieces from everyone and keep it movin? As long as their ain't any shuckin and jiving, I can rock with you.

Umar
Tariq
Polight
The Nation (Farrakhan, Rizza Islam, Nuri Muhammad whoever.)
Derrick Grace

Polarizing figures due to their strong opinions (which every man should have). I don't agree with any of them 100% on anything, but their is a wealth of knowledge on various aspects of history, economic empowerment, combat, educational system, etc. I ain't finna just discount all that because ****** like to take shots or be petty from time to time. :lol: Nor do I think we can necessarily afford to cancel each other right now.
 
I should reiterate

Also I think some of yall may have read that sentence wrong and think I said our ppl go to him "at all times" when what I said was "at all at times" meaning I find it sad that ppl go to him at all and that at certain times our ppl do pay that ***** any mind.

But if y'all read it as I intended it please tell me exactly whats wrong with it.
 
I should reiterate

Also I think some of yall may have read that sentence wrong and think I said our ppl go to him "at all times" when what I said was "at all at times" meaning I find it sad that ppl go to him at all and that at certain times our ppl do pay that ***** any mind.

But if y'all read it as I intended it please tell me exactly whats wrong with it.

Got you my G Master Zik Master Zik - I interpreted it as the former.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom