solewoman
Staff member
- 19,547
- 21,363
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2006
To me they don't market curry's shoes well. They just release with no build up. You don't see any buzz about them. So they did this to themselves.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
To me they don't market curry's shoes well. They just release with no build up. You don't see any buzz about them. So they did this to themselves.
that's because under Armour has no real credibility in da footwear landscape to command any type of buzz.
True but effort is everything. They didnt even try
considering da proximity of Nike headquarters in Oregon to da Bay area, I'd say pretty negligible.I wonder how much Durant/Nike landing in the Bay Area impacted the momentum Curry/UA had.
wonder how much of a difference it would've made had UA won the bid to get KD rather than him resigning with Nike
It would’ve been one more thing added to what people roast him about.wonder how much of a difference it would've made had UA won the bid to get KD rather than him resigning with Nike
I thought NB was the brand associated with the MAGA crowd
i don't see itTo be fair, Nike had a 32 year head start on UA while adidas had a 71 year head start. While they'll never dethrone Nike, with more time I think we'll see UA turn things around.
To be fair, Nike had a 32 year head start on UA while adidas had a 71 year head start. While they'll never dethrone Nike, with more time I think we'll see UA turn things around.
That tells us more about how poorly adidas is ran than UA actually.but they temporarily beat Adidas....
That tells us more about how poorly adidas is ran than UA actually.