- 1,488
- 302
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2008
Alright, you want to play the competent game?Originally Posted by K2theAblaM
Then what's the point of calling everyone idiots if you're just going to refute your own statement in your very next sentence? Maybe you're just incompetent and can't form ideas correctly?Originally Posted by NjCollector
It's the last part of the post, troll.Originally Posted by K2theAblaM
Originally Posted by NjCollector
Have any of you ever really used a weapon? %%%$ ain't COD, idiots. One bad recoil or tremble and you kill a hostage.
However, these are supposed to be the best of the best, a trained sniper should of been in high ground and setup camp there waiting for an order. Blame the commander.
What is the point of your post?
Idea=/=statement, Idea is a thought and a statement is a true or false sentence/phrase. What i said were my statements on the matter, not my ideas, as this isn't a philosophical matter.
Since it seems you have not comprehended my statement, i will explain, as it seems you are mentally challenged.
First of, the point of the first statement was for all the people saying "the sniper should of shot him on sight". Moreover, as a gun-holder, i have experienced how difficult it is to accurately shoot from long range, it was nearly impossible unless i was camped/grounded with the help of my bi-pod.
Furthermore, the second part of my post is infact another statement(i hope you are learning something). The connotation SWAT carries is the best of the best, these are hand chosen individuals who are the best at this craft. However, as all units they work in a team, and in any team there is a commander. The commander gives the order to fire to the sniper which is suppose to be on high-ground, waiting for the command. The Commander is at fault, he should of devised a better plan and if there was clear-shot, given the order.
PURPOSE: To describe how difficult it is to shoot a weapon at long range and explaining who is truly at fault.
Simple enough?