- 16,166
- 32,660
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2013
Nothing..
Said it was a magnitude 2.0 in Sherman Oaks. I’m right next to it, no wonder I felt that.
Edit: gonna put on a t shirt and keep my sneakers nearby. Just in case.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Nothing..
Easy for him to say when he hasn't dedicated his entire life to competing in one event. It certainly would make a statement but saying they "should" is a big ask.
Alright, now for why I'm really here.
I need some help understanding something because apparently, the way my brain worked it out for myself would make me a bigot.
So, a transwoman from New Zealand who spent her developmental years and early adulthood growing muscle with male levels of testosterone is allowed to compete in a woman's event because her current testosterone levels are below a certain threshold?
However, two ciswomen from Namibia who have hormonally lived as women their entire lives and developed as such are banned from their event because their natural levels of testosterone are too high?
Can someone help me make sense of this in the politically correct way that I'm supposed to?
or just form their own olympics competing against each other just like the paralympics. just imagine Iron Mike competing in the Women's boxing. this whole woke culture has gone far enough.Some people would scream racism. Which could be argued. Especially with the US Black woman wanting to use Soul Cap as their swim cap to protect their haute
But, perhaps there’s some sort of guidelines for this? Who knows.
I will say that the transgender competitor should have their own gender scale within the Olympics to compete among each other.
so that's how they made those facehuggers.