- Aug 4, 2005
- 35,104
- 17,023
We all know what’s going to happen:
THE OLD PHILADELPHIA EAGLES THREAD
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by Nike Jordan,
- Start date
- Mar 30, 2007
- 166,241
- 232,443
the more I think about it
the browns are the team who a trade like that woulda made sense.. maybe Steelers too
the browns are the team who a trade like that woulda made sense.. maybe Steelers too
District of Columbia
formerly dcmade
- Mar 17, 2013
- 8,592
- 4,210
No on Bobby Wagner before anyone says it 
- Oct 3, 2010
- 20,977
- 23,799
If dean or lloyd are there are we taking one?
- Mar 30, 2007
- 166,241
- 232,443
depends who else is there, at least if I was running things
- Oct 3, 2010
- 20,977
- 23,799
Well lets assume its pick 15 and we keep 16 as well
- Mar 30, 2007
- 166,241
- 232,443
you gotta give me options of IF say a certain other guy is there or not
like say if sauce Gardner is there, I’m taking sauce.. but I assume he won’t be, but if he is
- Oct 3, 2010
- 20,977
- 23,799
If somehow stingley or hamilton slip we gotta get 1
District of Columbia
formerly dcmade
- Mar 17, 2013
- 8,592
- 4,210
I can’t see Howie taking them if Ojabo or Jermaine Johnson is still available ..hell if any of Georgia’s linemen are there
This Draft is Howie’s wet dream with all the quality D lineman
This Draft is Howie’s wet dream with all the quality D lineman
District of Columbia
formerly dcmade
- Mar 17, 2013
- 8,592
- 4,210
For me it’s DL > Secondary > LB in order of importance
Our LBs aren’t gamechangers by any means ..but they aren’t net negatives like when we had Nate Gerry out there
Our LBs aren’t gamechangers by any means ..but they aren’t net negatives like when we had Nate Gerry out there
- Mar 30, 2007
- 166,241
- 232,443
there are a couple DB, DEs, DTs and a WR
and then the LBs
and then the LBs
- Oct 3, 2010
- 20,977
- 23,799
I assume sauce is gone based off his 40
I can’t see Howie taking them if Ojabo or Jermaine Johnson is still available ..hell if any of Georgia’s linemen are there
This Draft is Howie’s wet dream with all the quality D lineman
Well if they there and we pick back to back could he pick a lb and 1 of those pass rushers.
- Mar 30, 2007
- 166,241
- 232,443
Sauce, andrew booth, stingley.. maybe mcduffie
Davis, watt, lael
hutchinson, kayvon, jermaine Johnson, walker, ojabo
Hamilton
Jameson Williams
only 1 of the 1st is allowed to be on offense.. but there are oline guys too
Davis, watt, lael
hutchinson, kayvon, jermaine Johnson, walker, ojabo
Hamilton
Jameson Williams
only 1 of the 1st is allowed to be on offense.. but there are oline guys too
- Oct 3, 2010
- 20,977
- 23,799
Every mock I seen had us taking a wr with 1 of our 1sts. If we keep all 3 i can see it. Otherwise 2 for defense and maybe that 2nd for a wideout.
- Aug 4, 2005
- 35,104
- 17,023
Double dip at EDGE if two of the top guys are there
- Aug 4, 2005
- 35,104
- 17,023
We most likely go BPA. If it’s a wide reciever, then so be it. But D line #1 priority,
- Oct 3, 2010
- 20,977
- 23,799
Pass on George Karlaftis lol
- Mar 30, 2007
- 166,241
- 232,443
2 defense no matter what
guys should be there
read somewhere Jameson was called bigger desean and I can’t unsee it
guys should be there
read somewhere Jameson was called bigger desean and I can’t unsee it
- Aug 4, 2005
- 35,104
- 17,023
Dunno if y’all saw his presser at the combine, but Howie pretty much confirmed we’re drafting a DE/Edge with one of our firsts.
As he should. It’s the biggest need by far
Stingley is my #1 guy, but there’s a reason that howie was taking fliers on young CB talent with trades last year. With at least another year of Slay, Maddox having a great year. It’s highly doubtful that we draft a CB.
Oh and McLeod is likely to come back given his desire to play in Philly. And likely to come back on a team friendly deal.
Howie also said that they didn’t prioritize LB in the past due to Jims scheme and that Gannons scheme requires LBs to have different responsibilities.
If I HAD to guess, we go DL and LB in the first. Trade away one of the picks for a future 1st. And then probably go WR in the 2nd given the depth of talent at that position.
As he should. It’s the biggest need by far
Stingley is my #1 guy, but there’s a reason that howie was taking fliers on young CB talent with trades last year. With at least another year of Slay, Maddox having a great year. It’s highly doubtful that we draft a CB.
Oh and McLeod is likely to come back given his desire to play in Philly. And likely to come back on a team friendly deal.
Howie also said that they didn’t prioritize LB in the past due to Jims scheme and that Gannons scheme requires LBs to have different responsibilities.
If I HAD to guess, we go DL and LB in the first. Trade away one of the picks for a future 1st. And then probably go WR in the 2nd given the depth of talent at that position.
- Oct 3, 2010
- 20,977
- 23,799
- Aug 4, 2005
- 35,104
- 17,023
Buggin, dude is nice too. This DL class is seriously loaded. The strongest position by far in the class.
Double dip and the %s say that you’re likely to hit on at least one
- Oct 3, 2010
- 20,977
- 23,799
Ye I was thinking about all them cbs we stockpiled too
- Mar 30, 2007
- 166,241
- 232,443
knew I saw it someplace
but I legit went and looked at his highlights after that and it’s all I see now
- Aug 4, 2005
- 35,104
- 17,023
with Gannons scheme, I feel like a lot of shortcomings with CBs are hidden. Nelson was always solid but he was looking nice last year. And ain’t a coincidence that Maddox looked great too.
On the contrary, I think that LBs are a premium in this scheme. They’re really required to make plays in the open field.
Yeah we haven’t drafted LBs high in a long time. But we also have hardly put resources in the WR position dating back to the mcnabb era. And that has changed in the last few years.
I really think howie is starting to realize that he needs to switch up his thinking.
- Mar 30, 2007
- 166,241
- 232,443
Gannon legit got bullied in to playing smarter with the secondary
Similar threads
