- Nov 15, 2001
- 13,713
- 2,823
Those Answers with working DMX would be a dream come true.
The Official Reebok Question (A.I.) Thread.
- Thread in 'Other Brands' Thread starter Started by kingjay718,
- Start date
- Apr 15, 2004
- 44,408
- 74,257
Got these at rugged wearhouse over spring break for 29.99....NO LIE. These are still around.
- Mar 3, 2012
- 23,082
- 8,730
Dang I go to rugged warehouse all the time never look in their shoe section though. ^^^ But this is the reason I can't see paying over 80 bucks for a retro.
Yo holla at me if they have more
- Feb 11, 2008
- 19,846
- 13,044
- Mar 13, 2011
- 585
- 238
The Reebok Question Mid White/Red will return with a pearlized toe box on May 25th. This limited release will be sold exclusively at Reebok.com, Jimmy Jazz, Villa, Shoe Palace, and Shiekh’s for $125. Labeled a one-time drop, this pearlized pair will go back into the brand’s vault following this release.
Disappointed that they'll be $125.
Disappointed that they'll be $125.
- Oct 16, 2008
- 1,748
- 1,078
Defintely will scoop these up for Nostalgia reasons....
- Oct 18, 2011
- 735
- 33
IM NOT GONNA LIE
I SAW THIS COMING.
- Jan 21, 2011
- 336
- 15
It looks like the navy/white will be dropping as well acceding to Swizz Beatz twitter:
https://twitter.com/#!/THEREALSWIZZZ/media/slideshow?url=http%3A%2F%2Finstagr.am%2Fp%2FKdHgE4SDP7%2F
https://twitter.com/#!/THEREALSWIZZZ/media/slideshow?url=http%3A%2F%2Finstagr.am%2Fp%2FKdHgE4SDP7%2F
- Jun 7, 2004
- 1,703
- 165
im in for the royals, i got the reds 2 years ago for 50 bucks at dr jays (suede toe)
- Mar 30, 2012
- 635
- 673
$125 is steep for this shoe and making it "limited" is bs too specially since people were getting these at Ross, Marshalls and other outlet stores in the past. If I can get em, I'll bite the bullet and pay the amount but at this price, If I can't find I won't lose any sleep on em.
- Apr 8, 2010
- 12,770
- 6,243
I NEED this, to anybody who can cop extra pair, hook me up, size 13. thanks
- Nov 29, 2004
- 732
- 12
I want these, but not that bad.
After this drop, does anyone think these will be released more widely?
After this drop, does anyone think these will be released more widely?
- Feb 1, 2010
- 5,915
- 2,959
^Supposedly it's a one time drop, so probably no. But, they could just be saying that right now to build the hype.
- Oct 16, 2008
- 1,748
- 1,078
They said the same thing on the Swizz Beatz shoes....now there are everywhere...
- Oct 13, 2000
- 22,885
- 2,317
If its pearlized I'd consider going full 125, otherwise the waiting game begins
- Apr 6, 2012
- 91
- 10
Getting these so quick, great shoes.
- Mar 3, 2012
- 23,082
- 8,730
no
I loved this shoe, the only shoe I owned in 6th grade that I could get my parents to buy me (was this for 100 or like 3 beaters for 60)
I make money to buy these, but out of principle im not going to pay 25 more dollars out of principle.
Pearlized I dont even know how different that will be.
if i caught one on sale or could use a bday coupon i'd possibly consider
I loved this shoe, the only shoe I owned in 6th grade that I could get my parents to buy me (was this for 100 or like 3 beaters for 60)
I make money to buy these, but out of principle im not going to pay 25 more dollars out of principle.
Pearlized I dont even know how different that will be.
if i caught one on sale or could use a bday coupon i'd possibly consider
- Dec 24, 2009
- 1,841
- 73
Reebok pulling chains now smh at them
hongcouver604
Banned
- May 2, 2011
- 3,666
- 318
I remember these dropped to 49.99 a few years back on Eastbay, but they were the Team Questions... not sure what the difference is, but I think the ones that are coming out this month have pearl toes instead of suede.
- May 15, 2003
- 56,921
- 66,297
So Rebook is getting like Nike, slapping limited tags on kicks that sat and raising prices?
How do they jump from $100 to $125?
They think Swizz and Ross are making their brand that hot?
How do they jump from $100 to $125?
They think Swizz and Ross are making their brand that hot?
- May 15, 2003
- 56,921
- 66,297
All this Reebok talk made me finally wear these today.
I'll probably pick up the white/blue when they drop. I hope they go on sale and hype doesn't get to this line and these start selling out. I live in VA and these always went on sale.
I'll let you know if you see anything
I'll probably pick up the white/blue when they drop. I hope they go on sale and hype doesn't get to this line and these start selling out. I live in VA and these always went on sale.
I'll let you know if you see anything
- Mar 3, 2012
- 23,082
- 8,730
^This
I live in VA also, but never saw these after Highschool (granite I didn't look hard at all)
I'm overseas now I know they will be an Easy cop over here but 125 price tag just upsets me.
These were great shoes, but how dare you re release for more money when there are still tons floating around. for discount
- Mar 9, 2012
- 48
- 10
Y'all cats don't understand these are being made exactly how they originally released in '96(except I haven't seen the Reebok logo on the icy bottom toe tip). The higher price tag is for quality purposes and inflation so $125 ain't bad at all!!!
- May 15, 2003
- 56,921
- 66,297
Nike and JB taught you well.
In the original cost of sneakers, product and development and marketing factor in. In retros there's almost none of that. That's the most expensive part of creating the shoe. Not having it made in a sweatshop in Taiwan or china.
- Mar 9, 2012
- 48
- 10
If that was the case the quality in JB would never had dropped so $*!%!!!! This is simple economics Reebok knows ppl want Iversons but it's not as great as Jordan so what they do, made it a limited drop for those who want it and create a buzz for those that don't and knowing if ppl would pay $200+ on Air Jordan 2012 then $125 is a reasonable price for the Questions with original quality.
