- Oct 10, 2006
- 180
- 10
jeulz looks dumb wearing that jacet because its inside out
That's how most people wore them back in the days.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
jeulz looks dumb wearing that jacet because its inside out
That's how most people wore them back in the days.
Originally Posted by Khonfruntashun
I met Melo on New Years at a party in Toronto after the Nuggets beat the Raptors, here's a better shot of his watch, ring and chain.
What's good Q? Happy New Year!
some will argue its the movement that matters....but anyways i doubt he could care less about resale or brand integrity...he wanted bling and gotitOriginally Posted by Tmanm3
that breitling is garbage.. why would you mess up such a nice watch doing that. should have just bought a different watch because almost nothing left on that breitling is left but the dial and movement. should have did a channel set diamond bezel and diamond bracelet not all that. no respect here from a watch lover.
Originally Posted by oo206oo
Mother of Pearl never looks good on the face of a watch.
Mother of Pearl never looks good on the face of a watch.
why?
why?Originally Posted by Rjwco
Mother of Pearl never looks good on the face of a watch.
looks feminine only good execution ive seen on mother of pearl wasnt on a watch but that cartoon chain. i think it was.imoOriginally Posted by R31J23
why?Originally Posted by Rjwco
Mother of Pearl never looks good on the face of a watch.