- 27,785
- 12,449
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2011
cringe everytime i see or hear "sneaker game"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
FalseMan it's been like that.
If your love for sneakers was pure from the get go, it’ll never matter if the general public “gentrifies” them or not. With that being said, there’s a difference between a kid rocking yeezy 350’s and a kid rocking CB 94’s. You can tell who really knows there stuff.
Well not to get all philosophical up in here but cultures of all sorts by nature do NOT remain the same.A friend said something once that I think applies here:
"People are coming to Brooklyn for the culture not realizing that by coming here they're killing off that culture."
Same thing applies here I think.
dudes complaining about hunting for sneakers? what in the world...
people love using the gentrify term for anything nowadays. what ya'll really mad at is capitalism.
What does this imply? I can't see either of these making someone knowledgeable about sneakersWith that being said, there’s a difference between a kid rocking yeezy 350’s and a kid rocking CB 94’s. You can tell who really knows there stuff.
What does this imply? I can't see either of these making someone knowledgeable about sneakers
Can't say I've met anyone who bought Barkleys for craftsmanship. They're just as trendy for any kid in an urban area. Those, Foams, Uptempos, Pippens, Crazy 8s, etc., pretty much whatever you can find on the shelf at DTLR and ShoeCity.
It doesn't matter who made sneakers popular or who were in the ads. The articles main argument was that sneaker culture is being gentrified. Something can't be gentrified if people in middle class we're already buying/in the s eaker culture to begin with.
Dallas Club Denies Black Man Entry Because He’s Wearing Jordans; Black Guy Switches Shoes With White Friend; White Friend Tries To Get In With Jordans; You Know What Happens Next
http://blacksportsonline.com/home/2...t-in-with-jordans-you-know-what-happens-next/
I can't tell if it is a joke, or do people really like those things?this monarch trend is hilarious
What you're referring to is appropriation not gentrification. And as a Black man in 2018, I will still be denied entry into a venue for wearing sneakers if "they" don't want me in there. "Gentrification of the sneaker culture" has no impact on that.It does.
Not long ago, wearing kicks outside of a sports setting was considered low-class, working class attire. I can remember a time when establishments would regularly use the "no sneakers, no ball caps" posting as an euphemism for "no brown/black folks."
What the article is pointing out (akwardly I should say) is the fact that the perception of sneakers has changed because the faces pushing them have. Louis Vuitton x Supreme sells out and commands insane resell prices. Years ago, when Chanel and Reebok dropped an instapump collab, nobody gave a ****. I remember watching Pumas by Mihara Yasuhiro languish on Nordstrom Rack shelves; even adidas' designer lines regularly went on sale until some of Jeremy Scott's joints caught the public interest.
The people who know who those designers are are now the face of the hobby, and that is reflected in current footwear trends.
Penn said that he felt like this was colonization, rather than gentrification, but to me they mean the same thing in 2018.
The argument for the Mom&Pop stores not being able to stay open is the only one I can give to him on gentrification. The others arguments were on the growth of the culture going mainstream. There's no displacement for older sneaker heads or movements to push them out of the culture. Sneaker prices have gone up, but not to the point where they are pricing out the average consumer. Most of us would just bow out of it on our own accord.